do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-833/19: Order of the General Court of 22 October 2020 — Grammer v EUIPO (Representation of a geometric figure) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a geometric figure — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, electronic equipment, information technology industry, precision engineering, registered trade mark, scientific research, trade-mark law, traineeship, vehicle parts








C_2021028EN.01005101.xml










25.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 28/51






Order of the General Court of 22 October 2020 — Grammer v EUIPO (Representation of a geometric figure)
(Case T-833/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a geometric figure - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2021/C 28/78)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Grammer AG (Ursensollen, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2019 (Case R 1478/2019-2), relating to the application for registration of a figurative sign representing a geometric figure as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the order







1)


The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.










2)


Grammer AG shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9960 — KKR/Elsan) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 365/01
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, health care, investment company, medical institution, merger control








C_2020365EN.01000101.xml










29.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 365/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9960 — KKR/Elsan)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 365/01)
On 22 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9960. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-745/19: Order of the President of the Court of 22 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — PH, OI v ‘Eurobank Bulgaria’ AD
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer protection, interest, unfair terms of contract








C_2021044EN.01004101.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/41






Order of the President of the Court of 22 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — PH, OI v ‘Eurobank Bulgaria’ AD
(Case C-745/19) (1)

(2021/C 44/55)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.
Case C-273/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Article 52 — Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 — Decision No 1513/2002/EC — Grant agreement — Sensation project — Sixth framework programme — Eligible costs — Conflict of interests — Burden of proof — Time sheets — Audit report — Probative value — Principle of good financial management — Principle of proportionality)
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Framework Programme for Research and Development, audit, eligibility criteria, principle of proportionality, research project








C_2020433EN.01001001.xml










14.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 433/10






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission
(Case C-273/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 - Article 52 - Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 - Decision No 1513/2002/EC - Grant agreement - Sensation project - Sixth framework programme - Eligible costs - Conflict of interests - Burden of proof - Time sheets - Audit report - Probative value - Principle of good financial management - Principle of proportionality)
(2020/C 433/09)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) (represented by: V. Christianos and D. Karagkounis, dikigoroi)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: O. Verheecke and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Council Decision (EU) 2020/1555 of 22 October 2020 appointing a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Economic and Social Committee, Latvia, appointment of members








L_2020355EN.01000101.xml










26.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 355/1








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/1555
of 22 October 2020
         
appointing a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025
         


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 300(2) and Article 302 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/853 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),


Having regard to the proposal made by the Republic of Latvia,


After consulting the European Commission,

Whereas:







(1)


The term of office of the members of the European Economic and Social Committee expired on 20 September 2020.












(2)


On 2 October 2020, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2020/1392 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025, and repealing and replacing the Council Decision appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025 adopted on 18 September 2020 (2). One seat on the European Economic and Social Committee for the Republic of Latvia remained empty and needed to be filled by a subsequent appointing decision, applying retroactively as from 21 September 2020.












(3)


By letter of 21 September 2020, the Republic of Latvia confirmed the nomination of Ms Katrīna LEITĀNE for appointment as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025, in order to complete its list of members,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Ms Katrīna LEITĀNE, Representative of the National Youth Council of Latvia, is hereby appointed a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2020 to 20 September 2025.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply as from 21 September 2020.




Done at Brussels, 22 October 2020.


For the Council


The President

M. ROTH
            





(1)  
            OJ L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 15.

(2)  
            OJ L 322, 5.10.2020, p. 1.
Case C-274/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 — Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 — Actibio grant agreement — Actibio project — Seventh framework programme — Eligible costs — Conflict of interests — Burden of proof — Time sheets — Audit report — Probative value — Principle of proportionality)
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Framework Programme for Research and Development, audit, eligibility criteria, principle of proportionality, research project








C_2020433EN.01001002.xml










14.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 433/10






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) v European Commission
(Case C-274/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 - Actibio grant agreement - Actibio project - Seventh framework programme - Eligible costs - Conflict of interests - Burden of proof - Time sheets - Audit report - Probative value - Principle of proportionality)
(2020/C 433/10)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) (represented by: V. Christianos, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: O. Verheecke and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ethniko Kentro Erevnas kai Technologikis Anaptyxis (EKETA) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 21 October 2020 2020/C 352/03
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020352EN.01001401.xml










22.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 352/14






Euro exchange rates (1)

21 October 2020
(2020/C 352/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1852 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,27 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4432 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90754 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3645 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0715 




ISK


Iceland króna


164,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,9315 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,185 




HUF


Hungarian forint


364,01 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5740 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8758 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,3084 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6733 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5557 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1854 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7875 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6067 




KRW


South Korean won


1 343,08 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4374 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8879 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5755 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 342,44 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9115 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,539 




RUB


Russian rouble


91,4095 




THB


Thai baht


37,026 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6118 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,9348 




INR


Indian rupee


87,3745 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-539/20 P: Appeal brought on 22 October 2020 by Hochmann Marketing GmbH against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 23 January 2020 in Case T-807/19, Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Commission
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, appeal to the Court (EU), infringement procedure (EU), legal expenses, marketing








C_2021252EN.01000502.xml










28.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/5






Appeal brought on 22 October 2020 by Hochmann Marketing GmbH against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 23 January 2020 in Case T-807/19, Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Commission
(Case C-539/20 P)
(2021/C 252/07)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Hochmann Marketing GmbH (represented by: J. Jennings, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 6 May 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly inadmissible and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Case C-702/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Silver Plastics GmbH & Co. KG, Johannes Reifenhäuser Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Retail food packaging market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23 — Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights — Fundamental right to a fair trial — Principle of equality of arms — Right ‘to an examination in person’ — Hearing of witnesses — Statement of reasons — Single and continuous infringement — Upper limit of fine)
Date: 2020-10-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU competition policy, cartel, control of restrictive practices, foodstuff, packaging product, restriction on competition, retail selling, right to justice, sanction (EU)








C_2020433EN.01001501.xml










14.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 433/15






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2020 — Silver Plastics GmbH & Co. KG, Johannes Reifenhäuser Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission
(Case C-702/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Retail food packaging market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23 - Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights - Fundamental right to a fair trial - Principle of equality of arms - Right ‘to an examination in person’ - Hearing of witnesses - Statement of reasons - Single and continuous infringement - Upper limit of fine)
(2020/C 433/17)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellants: Silver Plastics GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: M. Wirtz and S. Möller, Rechtsanwälte), Johannes Reifenhäuser Holding GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: C. Karbaum, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen, I. Zaloguin and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Silver Plastics GmbH & Co. KG and Johannes Reifenhäuser Holding GmbH & Co. KG to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.