do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-633/20: Action brought on 9 October 2020 — CNMSE and Others v Parliament and Council
Date: 2020-10-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: coronavirus disease, drug surveillance, environmental protection, epidemic, genetically modified organism, medicinal product, precautionary principle, principle of proportionality, public consultation, right to health








C_2021009EN.01002402.xml










11.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/24






Action brought on 9 October 2020 — CNMSE and Others v Parliament and Council
(Case T-633/20)
(2021/C 9/36)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Coordination nationale médicale santé — environnement (CNMSE) (Paris, France) and five other applicants (represented by: G. Tumerelle, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament and Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


declare EU regulation No 2020/1043 void.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, based on the consequences and risks that the contested regulation (1) entails. The applicants take the view, in this respect, that there was no justification for removing all measures for assessing the risks associated with genetically modified organisms. They also criticise the lack of public consultation, lack of information and labelling and lack of scientific grounds.










2.


Second plea in law, based on defects affecting the formal legality of the contested act. The applicants complain that the procedure followed did not involve public consultation, failed to observe the differentiated procedure laid down in Article 7 of Directive 2001/18 (2), and breached essential procedural requirements. They also plead lack of an adequate legal basis and error of assessment.










3.


Third plea in law, based on defects affecting the substantive legality of the contested act. The applicants allege, in this respect, non-compliance with the precautionary principle, non-compliance with the fundamental principle of EU law in respect of the right to protection of legitimate expectations and the acquired right to protection of health and the environment. The applicants also plead breach of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and a manifest error of assessment.






(1)  Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 on the conduct of clinical trials with and supply of medicinal products for human use containing or consisting of genetically modified organisms intended to treat or prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) (OJ 2020 L 231, p. 12).

(2)  Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC — Commission Declaration (OJ 2001 L 106, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9928 — QuattroR/HGM/Burgo) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 349/02
Date: 2020-10-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, investment company, merger control, pulp and paper industry








C_2020349EN.01000401.xml










20.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 349/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9928 — QuattroR/HGM/Burgo)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 349/02)
On 9 October 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9928. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-16/20: Order of the President of the Court of 9 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Badajoz — Spain) — Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas y Seguros de España (Adicae Consumidores Críticos y Responsables) v Liberbank SA
Date: 2020-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, financial institution, mortgage, proof, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_2021044EN.01004104.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/41






Order of the President of the Court of 9 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Badajoz — Spain) — Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas y Seguros de España (Adicae Consumidores Críticos y Responsables) v Liberbank SA
(Case C-16/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/58)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Corrigendum to Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9895 — KKR/Waves UK Divestco) (Official Journal of the European Union C 327 of 5 October 2020) 2020/C 335/09
Date: 2020-10-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: cosmetics industry, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_2020335EN.01001101.xml










9.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 335/11






Corrigendum to Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9895 — KKR/Waves UK Divestco)

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 327 of 5 October 2020
)

(2020/C 335/09)
Publication (2020/C 327/02) on page 2 is to be considered null and void.
Case C-15/20: Order of the President of the Court of 9 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Badajoz — Spain) — Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas y Seguros de España (Adicae Consumidores Críticos y Responsables) v Caja Almendralejo Sociedad Cooperativa de Credito
Date: 2020-10-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, financial institution, mortgage, proof, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_2021044EN.01004103.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/41






Order of the President of the Court of 9 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Badajoz — Spain) — Asociación de Usuarios de Bancos, Cajas y Seguros de España (Adicae Consumidores Críticos y Responsables) v Caja Almendralejo Sociedad Cooperativa de Credito
(Case C-15/20) (1)

(2021/C 44/57)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 8 October 2020 2020/C 335/07
Date: 2020-10-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020335EN.01000801.xml










9.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 335/8






Euro exchange rates (1)

8 October 2020
(2020/C 335/07)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1765 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,69 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4423 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,91035 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4468 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0799 




ISK


Iceland króna


162,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,9038 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,092 




HUF


Hungarian forint


357,48 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4843 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8758 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,3304 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6421 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5583 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1181 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7856 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5979 




KRW


South Korean won


1 355,48 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4995 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9894 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5680 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 362,20 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8854 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,004 




RUB


Russian rouble


91,0675 




THB


Thai baht


36,724 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5832 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,1418 




INR


Indian rupee


86,1860 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Council Recommendation of 9 October 2020 on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank 2020/C 338/02
Date: 2020-10-09
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the European Central Bank








C_2020338EN.01000201.xml










12.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/2






COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
of 9 October 2020
on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank
(2020/C 338/02)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 283(2) and 139(2) thereof,
Having regard to Protocol No 4 on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.2 thereof,
HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL THAT:
Mr Frank ELDERSON be appointed as a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years with effect from 15 December 2020.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2020.


For the Council


The President

M. ROTH
Case T-622/20: Action brought on 9 October 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO (Cachet)
Date: 2020-10-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal nutrition, cosmetic product, dietary product, food supplement, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2020399EN.01004301.xml










23.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/43






Action brought on 9 October 2020 — Aldi v EUIPO (Cachet)
(Case T-622/20)
(2020/C 399/60)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, C. Fürsen and M. Minkner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Cachet — Application for registration No 18 092 827

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2020 in Case R 452/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as it confirmed rejection of the application for registration in respect of the goods in Class 5 ‘Veterinary preparations; Medical preparations; Pharmaceutical products; Sanitary preparations for medical purposes; Dietetic food and substances adapted for medical or veterinary use, food supplements for human beings and animals’ and dismissed the appeal;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.