do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1385 of 1 October 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Date: 2020-10-01
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person




L_2020320EN.01000901.xml










2.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 320/9








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2020/1385
of 1 October 2020
         
amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.












(2)


On 27 March 2020, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/458 (2).












(3)


The restrictive measures concerning one person should be extended for a further period of six months and the entries for two persons should be deleted.












(4)


Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 is amended as follows:






(1)


in Article 17, paragraphs 3 and 4 are replaced by the following:

‘3.   The measures referred to in Article 8(2) shall apply with regard to entry 15 in Annex II until 2 April 2021.


4.   The measures referred to in Article 9(2) shall apply with regard to entry 20 in Annex IV until 2 April 2021.’;











(2)


Annex II and Annex IV are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 1 October 2020.


For the Council


The President

M. ROTH
            





(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 of 31 July 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, and repealing Decision 2011/137/CFSP (OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34).

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/458 of 27 March 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (OJ L 97, 30.3.2020, p. 13).




ANNEX
Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 is amended as follows:






(1)


in Annex II (List of persons and entities referred to in Article 8(2)), entry 14 (concerning SALEH ISSA GWAIDER, Agila) and entry 16 (concerning ABU SAHMAIN, Nuri) are deleted from the list set out in Part A (Persons);










(2)


in Annex IV (List of persons and entities referred to in Article 9(2)), entry 19 (concerning SALEH ISSA GWAIDER, Agila) and entry 21 (concerning ABU SAHMAIN, Nuri) are deleted from the list set out in Part A (Persons).
Case C-486/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 1 October 2020 — Varuh človekovih pravic Republike Slovenije
Date: 2020-10-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, data collection, data protection, personal data, protection of privacy, traveller








C_2020414EN.01002402.xml










30.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 1 October 2020 — Varuh človekovih pravic Republike Slovenije
(Case C-486/20)
(2020/C 414/35)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Varuh človekovih pravic Republike Slovenije

Defendants: Državni zbor Republike Slovenije, Vlada Republike Slovenije

Questions referred







1.


Is point 8 of Annex I to Directive (EU) 2016/681 (1) compatible with Articles 7 and 8 and the first paragraph of Article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in view of the fact that it is not clear whether it includes only the information relating to the fact that the person concerned has frequent flier status, or also other information relating to flights and bookings covered by the frequent flyer programme, which might mean that the requirement relating to the clarity and precision of rules affecting the right to protection of private life and the right to protection of personal data is not met?










2.


Is point 12 of Annex I to Directive (EU) 2016/681 compatible with Articles 7 and 8 and the first paragraph of Article 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in view of the fact that the requested information is not set out in detail and, at the same time, that that point of the annex does not lay down any limitation on the nature and scope of the information, which might mean that the requirement relating to the clarity and precision of rules affecting the right to protection of private life and the right to protection of personal data is not met?






(1)  Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 132).
Case C-654/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — FP Passenger Service GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights — Right to compensation in the event of delay — Length of delay — Time of opening of the aircraft’s doors at destination — Actual arrival time — Scheduled time of arrival — Question on which the Court has already ruled or where the answer to such a question may be clearly deduced from the case-law)
Date: 2020-10-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, indemnification, traveller








C_2020423EN.01001401.xml










7.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 423/14






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — FP Passenger Service GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG
(Case C-654/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights - Right to compensation in the event of delay - Length of delay - Time of opening of the aircraft’s doors at destination - Actual arrival time - Scheduled time of arrival - Question on which the Court has already ruled or where the answer to such a question may be clearly deduced from the case-law)
(2020/C 423/21)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Korneuburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: FP Passenger Service GmbH

Defendant: Austrian Airlines AG

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, read in the light of the judgment of 4 September 2014, Germanwings (C-452/13, EU:C:2014:2141), must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of determining the extent of the delay suffered by passengers on a flight on arrival, it is necessary to calculate the time between the scheduled time of arrival and the actual arrival time, that is to say, the moment when at least one of the doors of the aircraft is opened, it being understood that, at that moment, the passengers are permitted to leave it.


(1)  OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.
Case C-331/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 98 — Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services — Annex III, point 1 — Definitions of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’ and ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or as a substitute for foodstuffs’ — Aphrodisiac products)
Date: 2020-10-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, food substitute, food supplement, foodstuff, goods and services, supply, tax relief








C_2020399EN.01001502.xml










23.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/15






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X
(Case C-331/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 98 - Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services - Annex III, point 1 - Definitions of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’ and ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or as a substitute for foodstuffs’ - Aphrodisiac products)
(2020/C 399/20)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant: X

Operative part of the judgment

The concepts of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’ and ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or as a substitute for foodstuffs’, set out in point 1 of Annex III to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, must be interpreted as meaning that they refer to all products containing nutrients which serve as building blocks, generate energy and regulate its functions, which are necessary to keep the human body alive and enable it to function and develop, and which are consumed in order to provide it with those nutrients.


(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.