do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1321 of 17 September 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Aydın Kestanesi’ (PDO))
Date: 2020-09-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Türkiye, designation of origin, fresh fruit, labelling, nut, product designation








L_2020310EN.01000101.xml










24.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 310/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1321
of 17 September 2020
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Aydın Kestanesi’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In accordance with Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey’s application to register the name ‘Aydın Kestanesi’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aydın Kestanesi’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Aydın Kestanesi’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 September 2020.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 185, 4.6.2020, p. 16.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1247 of 2 September 2020 operating deductions from fishing quotas available for certain stocks in 2020 on account of overfishing in the previous years (Official Journal of the European Union L 288 of 3 September 2020)
Date: 2020-09-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, EU waters, catch of fish, catch quota, conservation of fish stocks, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








L_2020303EN.01002301.xml










17.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 303/23







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1247 of 2 September 2020 operating deductions from fishing quotas available for certain stocks in 2020 on account of overfishing in the previous years

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 288 of 3 September 2020
)


On page 23, in the table of the Annex:
for:



















‘DK



POK


1N2AB.


Saithe


Norwegian waters of 1 and 2


/


17 000


50 968


299,81 %


50 968


1,00


/


/


50 968’





read:



















‘DK



POK


1N2AB.


Saithe


Norwegian waters of 1 and 2


/


17 000


50 968


299,81 %


33 968


1,00


/


/


33 968’





Page 25, table of the Annex:
for:



















“PT



BUM


ATLANT


Blue marlin


Atlantic Ocean


50 440


7 076


18 016


254,61 %


10 940


1,00


A


/


10 940”





read:



















“PT



BUM


ATLANT


Blue marlin


Atlantic Ocean


50 440


7 076


18 016


254,61 %


10 940


1,00


A


/


16 410”
Case C-648/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București — Romania) — Autoritatea națională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE) v Societatea de Producere a Energiei Electrice în Hidrocentrale Hidroelectrica SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market in electricity — Free movement of goods — Article 35 TFEU — Quantitative restrictions on exports — Measures having equivalent effect — National measure requiring electricity producers to offer for sale all the electricity available to them exclusively on a centralised competitive market of the Member State concerned)
Date: 2020-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU competition policy, Romania, electrical energy, energy production, export (EU), export restriction, free movement of goods, quantitative restriction








C_2020390EN.01000302.xml










16.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 390/3






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București — Romania) — Autoritatea națională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE) v Societatea de Producere a Energiei Electrice în Hidrocentrale Hidroelectrica SA
(Case C-648/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Internal market in electricity - Free movement of goods - Article 35 TFEU - Quantitative restrictions on exports - Measures having equivalent effect - National measure requiring electricity producers to offer for sale all the electricity available to them exclusively on a centralised competitive market of the Member State concerned)
(2020/C 390/04)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Autoritatea națională de reglementare în domeniul energiei (ANRE)

Defendant: Societatea de Producere a Energiei Electrice în Hidrocentrale Hidroelectrica SA

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 35 and 36 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that national legislation, as interpreted by the authority responsible for applying it, which requires national electricity producers to offer for sale all the electricity available to them on the platforms managed by the only operator designated for national electricity market trading services, constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on exports that cannot be justified on grounds of public security connected to the security of energy supply, in so far as such legislation is not proportionate to the objective pursued.


(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Case C-791/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Stichting Schoonzicht v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Immovable property acquired as capital goods — Deduction of input tax paid — Adjustment of the initial deduction — Single adjustment of that deduction in full after the goods in question are first used — Adjustment period)
Date: 2020-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, acquisition of property, capital goods, real property, tax relief








C_2020423EN.01000401.xml










7.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 423/4






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Stichting Schoonzicht v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
(Case C-791/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Immovable property acquired as capital goods - Deduction of input tax paid - Adjustment of the initial deduction - Single adjustment of that deduction in full after the goods in question are first used - Adjustment period)
(2020/C 423/05)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Stichting Schoonzicht

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 184 to 187 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding a capital goods adjustment scheme, laid down in national rules in which the adjustment is to be spread over several years, from providing that, in the year the goods in question are first used, where that year is also the first adjustment year, the total amount of the initial deduction for those capital goods is adjusted in a single step, if, when first used, it becomes apparent that that deduction deviates from the deduction which the taxable person was entitled to apply on the basis of the actual use of those goods.


(1)  OJ C 122, 1.4.2019.
Case C-540/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — WV v Landkreis Harburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations — Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 — Article 3(b) — Court for the place where the maintenance creditor is habitually resident — Action for recovery brought by a public body subrogated to the claims of a maintenance creditor)
Date: 2020-09-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil proceedings, claim, jurisdiction, maintenance obligation, public institution, residence, social-security benefit








C_2020423EN.01001001.xml










7.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 423/10






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — WV v Landkreis Harburg
(Case C-540/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations - Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 - Article 3(b) - Court for the place where the maintenance creditor is habitually resident - Action for recovery brought by a public body subrogated to the claims of a maintenance creditor)
(2020/C 423/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: WV

Respondent: Landkreis Harburg

Operative part of the judgment

A public body which seeks to recover, by way of an action for recovery, sums paid in place of maintenance to a maintenance creditor, and to which the claims of that maintenance creditor against the maintenance debtor have been transferred by way of subrogation, may validly invoke the jurisdiction of the court for the place where the creditor is habitually resident, as provided in Article 3(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations.


(1)  OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.
Notice pursuant to Article 6(6)(f) of Protocol II concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation under the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part and the Pacific States, of the other part 2020/C 308/02
Date: 2020-09-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: Solomon Islands, administrative cooperation, cooperation agreement (EU), fishery product, interim agreement (EU), originating product, protocol to an agreement








C_2020308EN.01000201.xml










17.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 308/2






Notice pursuant to Article 6(6)(f) of Protocol II concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation under the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part and the Pacific States, of the other part
(2020/C 308/02)
By the present notice interested parties are informed that the Solomon Islands have made, on 18 May 2020, a notification to the European Commission in accordance with Article 6(6)(b) of Protocol II concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, as regards processed fishery products, under the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of the one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part (OJ L 272, 16.10.2009, p. 1).