do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-626/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Slovenia v Commission (Agriculture — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Designations of origin in the wine sector — Wine labelling — Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin — Prohibition — Derogation — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 — Inclusion of the name of the wine grape variety ‘teran’ in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 — Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union — Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Right to property — Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union — Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making — Institutional balance)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Croatia, accession to the European Union, consumer information, designation of origin, labelling, ownership, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, product designation, wine








C_2020378EN.01002502.xml










9.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 378/25






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Slovenia v Commission
(Case T-626/17) (1)

(Agriculture - Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 - Designations of origin in the wine sector - Wine labelling - Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin - Prohibition - Derogation - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 - Inclusion of the name of the wine grape variety ‘teran’ in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 - Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union - Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Right to property - Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union - Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making - Institutional balance)
(2020/C 378/29)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: V. Klemenc and T. Mihelič Žitko, acting as Agents, and by R. Knaak, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers, I. Galindo Martín and B. Rous Demiri, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Croatia (represented by: G. Vidović Mesarek, acting as Agent, and by I. Ćuk, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 of 19 May 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 as regards the wine grape varieties and their synonyms that may appear on wine labels (OJ 2017 L 190, p. 5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the application;










2.


Orders the Republic of Slovenia to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Republic of Croatia to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 392, 20.11.2017.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2020/C 299/08
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Portugal, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2020299EN.01000801.xml










9.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/8






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2020/C 299/08)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


20.8.2020




Duration


20.8.2020-31.12.2020




Member State


Portugal




Stock or Group of stocks


RJU/9-C.




Species


Undulate ray (raja undulata)




Zone


Union waters of 9




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


12/TQ123






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case T-625/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Daw v EUIPO (SOS Innenfarbe) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark SOS Innenfarbe — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, metal coating, paints and varnishes, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020378EN.01003102.xml










9.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 378/31






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Daw v EUIPO (SOS Innenfarbe)
(Case T-625/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark SOS Innenfarbe - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2020/C 378/38)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2019 (Case R 277/2019-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign SOS Innenfarbe as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Daw SE is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.
Case T-669/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Novomatic v EUIPO — Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS — Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS — Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, automatic game, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020378EN.01003201.xml










9.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 378/32






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Novomatic v EUIPO — Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS)
(Case T-669/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS - Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS - Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 378/39)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Novomatic AG (Gumpoldskirchen, Austria) (represented by: W. Mosing, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Brouwerij Haacht NV (Boortmeerbeek, Belgium) (represented by: G. Glas and E. Taelman, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 July 2019 (Case R 2528/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Brouwerij Haacht and Novomatic.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Novomatic AG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 8 September 2020 2020/C 299/01
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020299EN.01000101.xml










9.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

8 September 2020
(2020/C 299/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1785 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,20 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4407 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90453 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3735 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0820 




ISK


Iceland króna


165,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,6713 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,521 




HUF


Hungarian forint


361,37 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4483 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8595 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,8202 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6286 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5523 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1338 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7722 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6149 




KRW


South Korean won


1 402,14 




ZAR


South African rand


20,0033 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0658 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5330 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 512,55 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9126 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,333 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,0213 




THB


Thai baht


37,082 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3427 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,7685 




INR


Indian rupee


87,1060 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-437/16: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit — Language knowledge — Limitation of the choice of second language to German, English and French — Language for communication — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination on grounds of language — Justification — Interest of the service — Proportionality)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EPSO, accountant, administrator, audit, competition (EU), language skills, linguistic discrimination, principle of proportionality, use of languages








C_2020378EN.01002501.xml










9.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 378/25






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-437/16) (1)

(Language regime - Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit - Language knowledge - Limitation of the choice of second language to German, English and French - Language for communication - Regulation No 1 - Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations - Discrimination on grounds of language - Justification - Interest of the service - Proportionality)
(2020/C 378/28)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by P. Gentili, Avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Intervener, in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agent)

Re

Action brought under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/322/16 for drawing up a reserve list of Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7) (OJ 2016, C 171 A, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls notice of open competition EPSO/AD/322/16 for drawing up a reserve list of Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7);










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Italian Republic;










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.
Case T-50/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Casual Dreams v EUIPO — López Fernández (Dayaday) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday — Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Reputation — Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, optical industry, registered trade mark, sports equipment, textile product, trade-mark law








C_2020378EN.01002901.xml










9.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 378/29






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Casual Dreams v EUIPO — López Fernández (Dayaday)
(Case T-50/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Dayaday - Earlier national figurative marks DAYADAY and dayaday - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Reputation - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark)
(2020/C 378/34)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Casual Dreams, SLU (Manresa, Spain) (represented by: A. B. Padial Martínez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O'Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Miguel Ángel López Fernández (Fuensalida, Spain)

Re

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2018 (Case R 2097/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Casual Dreams and Mr López Fernández.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 November 2018 (Case R 2097/2018-5) in so far as it concerns the following goods:






—


‘Polarizing spectacles’, ‘Snow goggles’, ‘Cyclists’ glasses’, ‘Goggles for sports’, ‘Swim goggles’, in Class 9;










—


‘Wash cloths’, ‘Textile goods and substitutes for textile goods’, ‘Fabrics’, ‘Textiles, not included in other classes’, in Class 24;














2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the parties each to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.
Case T-149/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Arkéa Direct Bank and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank deposit, banking supervision, credit institution, financial supervision, guarantee, payment








C_2020399EN.01002701.xml










23.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/27






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Arkéa Direct Bank and Others v ECB
(Case T-149/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments - Tasks entrusted to the ECB - Specific supervision powers of the ECB - Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital - Absence of individual examination)
(2020/C 399/38)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Arkéa Direct Bank (Puteaux, France) and the nine other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, R. Bax and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment, first, of ECB Decision ECB/SSM/2017-9695000CG7B84NLR5984/207 of 19 December 2017, and, second, of ECB Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCMU-4 of 14 February 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls paragraph 8 of Decision ECB/SSM/2017-9695000CG7B84NLR5984/207 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 19 December 2017 and paragraph 5 of Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCMU-4 of the ECB of 14 February 2019;










2.


Orders the ECB to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Case T-145/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank deposit, banking supervision, credit institution, financial supervision, guarantee, payment








C_2020399EN.01002601.xml










23.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/26






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v ECB
(Case T-145/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments - Tasks entrusted to the ECB - Specific supervision powers of the ECB - Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital - Absence of individual examination)
(2020/C 399/36)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Paris, France) and the 37 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, R. Bax and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment, first, of ECB Decision ECB/SSM/2017-9695000CG7B84NLR5984/207 of 19 December 2017, and, second, of ECB Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCMU-4 of 14 February 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls paragraph 8 of Decision ECB/SSM/2017-9695000CG7B84NLR5984/207 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 19 December 2017 and paragraph 5 of Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCMU-4 of the ECB of 14 February 2019;










2.


Orders the ECB to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Case T-146/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — BPCE and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank deposit, banking supervision, credit institution, financial supervision, guarantee, payment








C_2020399EN.01002602.xml










23.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/26






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — BPCE and Others v ECB
(Case T-146/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments - Tasks entrusted to the ECB - Specific supervision powers of the ECB - Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital - Absence of individual examination)
(2020/C 399/37)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: BPCE (Paris, France) and the 36 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, R. Bax and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment, first, of ECB Decision ECB/SSM/2017-9695005MSX1OYEMGDF46/338 of 19 December 2017, and, second, of ECB Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRBPC-22 of 14 February 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls paragraph 4 of Decision ECB/SSM/2017-9695005MSX1OYEMGDF46/338 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 19 December 2017 and paragraphs 3.4 to 3.7 of Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRBPC 22 of the ECB of 14 February 2019;










2.


Orders the ECB to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Case T-144/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Crédit agricole and Others v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments — Tasks entrusted to the ECB — Specific supervision powers of the ECB — Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital — Absence of individual examination)
Date: 2020-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank deposit, banking supervision, credit institution, financial supervision, guarantee, payment








C_2020399EN.01002501.xml










23.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/25






Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Crédit agricole and Others v ECB
(Case T-144/18) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Contribution to the deposit guarantee system or to the single resolution fund by means of irrevocable payment commitments - Tasks entrusted to the ECB - Specific supervision powers of the ECB - Article 4(1)(f) and Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Measure requiring the deduction of the cumulative amount of irrevocable payment commitments outstanding from Tier 1 capital - Absence of individual examination)
(2020/C 399/35)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Crédit agricole SA (Montrouge, France) and the 69 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, R. Bax and F. Bonnard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment, first, of ECB Decision ECB/SSM/2017-969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/380 of 19 December 2017, and, second, of ECB Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCAG-17 of 14 February 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls paragraph 9 of Decision ECB/SSM/2017-969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/380 of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 19 December 2017 and Article 3 of Annex A thereto as well as paragraph 9 of Decision ECB-SSM-2019-FRCAG-17 of the ECB of 14 February 2019 and Article 3 of the annex thereto;










2.


Orders the ECB to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.