do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-943/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘ONDO’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, contract terms, cost of borrowing, deadline for payment








C_2020414EN.01002603.xml










30.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/26






Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘ONDO’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
(Case C-943/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/41)
Language of the case: Latvian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Case C-944/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — AS ‘4finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, contract terms, cost of borrowing, deadline for payment








C_2020414EN.01002604.xml










30.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/26






Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — AS ‘4finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
(Case C-944/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/42)
Language of the case: Latvian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Case T-559/20: Action brought on 7 September 2020 — Yadex International v EUIPO — Sütas süt ürünleri (PINAR Süzme Peynir)
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, milk product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020371EN.01002201.xml










3.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 371/22






Action brought on 7 September 2020 — Yadex International v EUIPO — Sütas süt ürünleri (PINAR Süzme Peynir)
(Case T-559/20)
(2020/C 371/24)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Yadex International GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: N. Johnson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sütas süt ürünleri AS (Bursa, Turkey)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark PINAR Süzme Peynir — International registration No 1 394 295

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2020 in Case R 2127/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and allow the applicant’s appeal of 23 September 2019 against the decision of the Opposition Division of 23 July 2019;










—


order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-415/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 September 2020 — Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, customs duties, export refund, frozen product, interest, poultrymeat, specification of tariff heading








C_2020423EN.01002701.xml










7.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 423/27






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 September 2020 — Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg
(Case C-415/20)
(2020/C 423/40)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg

Questions referred







1.


Does the requirement under EU law for Member States to repay, with interest, duties levied in breach of EU law also apply where the reason for the repayment is not a finding by the Court of Justice of the European Union that a provision of EU law has been breached, but that the Court of Justice has interpreted a (sub)heading of the Combined Nomenclature?










2.


Do the principles relating to a claim to interest established by the Court of Justice of the European Union also apply to the payment of export refunds refused by the Member State authority in breach of EU law?
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1 2020/C 296/03
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: European Commission, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts




C_2020296EN.01001401.xml










7.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 296/14






Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 1
(2020/C 296/03)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2020


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1




EUROPEAN UNION CONTRIBUTION





1 0


EUROPEAN UNION CONTRIBUTION


30 382 852 


 


30 382 852 




 



Title 1 — Total




30 382 852 



 



30 382 852 






2




PARTICIPATION OF THIRD COUNTRIES





2 0


PARTICIPATION OF THIRD COUNTRIES


386 148 


1 342 000 


1 728 148 




 



Title 2 — Total




386 148 




1 342 000 




1 728 148 







 



GRAND TOTAL




30 769 000 




1 342 000 




32 111 000 






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2020


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1




STAFF EXPENDITURES





1 1


REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES


23 640 000 


520 000 


24 160 000 




1 2


SOCIOMEDICAL AND TRAINING EXPENDITURE


1 500 000 


64 000 


1 564 000 




 



Title 1 — Total




25 140 000 




584 000 




25 724 000 






2




INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 1


BUILDING EXPENDITURE


3 194 000 


615 000 


3 809 000 




2 2


ICT


971 000 


50 000 


1 021 000 




2 3


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURE


176 000 


35 000 


211 000 




 



Title 2 — Total




4 341 000 




700 000 




5 041 000 






3




PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE





3 1


PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE


1 288 000 


58 000 


1 346 000 




 



Title 3 — Total




1 288 000 




58 000 




1 346 000 







 



GRAND TOTAL




30 769 000 




1 342 000 




32 111 000 






Establishment plan










Function group and grade


Permanent posts


Temporary posts




2020


2019


2020


2019






AD 16


—


—


—


—




AD 15


—


—


—


—




AD 14


—


—


7


7




AD 13


—


—


9


9




AD 12


—


—


5


5




AD 11


—


—


5


5




AD 10


—


—


5


5




AD 9


—


—


9


7




AD 8


—


—


12


10




AD 7


—


—


10


10




AD 6


—


—


2


2




AD 5


—


—


3


1




Total AD


—


—


67


61






AST 11


—


—


—


—




AST 10


—


—


—


—




AST 9


—


—


—


—




AST 8


—


—


—


—




AST 7


—


—


1


1




AST 6


—


—


2


2




AST 5


—


—


3


3




AST 4


—


—


3


3




AST 3


—


—


2


1




AST 2


—


—


—


—




AST 1


—


—


—


—




Total AST


—


—


11


10






Total


—


—


78


71





Estimate of number of contract staff (expressed in full-time equivalents)








Contract staff posts


2020


2019






FG IV


135


127




FG III


72


72




FG II


32


32




FG I


—


—




Total


239


231
Special Report 16/2020 The European Semester – Country-Specific Recommendations address important issues but need better implementation 2020/C 295/03
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU Member State, EU growth strategy, European Semester, budget policy, economic policy, employment policy, fiscal policy








C_2020295EN.01000301.xml










7.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/3






Special Report 16/2020
The European Semester – Country-Specific Recommendations address important issues but need better implementation
(2020/C 295/03)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report 16/2020. ‘The European Semester – Country-Specific Recommendations address important issues but need better implementation’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/900 of 25 June 2020 amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1838 as regards certain fishing opportunities for 2020 in the Baltic Sea and amending Regulation (EU) 2020/123 as regards certain fishing opportunities in 2020 in Union and non-Union waters (Official Journal of the European Union L 207 of 30 June 2020)
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Baltic Sea, EU waters, catch by species, catch quota, conservation of fish stocks, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








L_2020292EN.01000301.xml










7.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 292/3







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/900 of 25 June 2020 amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1838 as regards certain fishing opportunities for 2020 in the Baltic Sea and amending Regulation (EU) 2020/123 as regards certain fishing opportunities in 2020 in Union and non-Union waters

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 207 of 30 June 2020
)


On page 7, Article 2, point 4 (paragraph 3 of new Article 14):
for:







‘3.


By way of derogation from paragraph 2, fishing vessels referred to in paragraph 2 may fish in the areas referred to in paragraph 1 provided that …’,





read:







‘3.


By way of derogation from paragraph 2, fishing vessels referred to in paragraph 2 may fish in the areas referred to in that paragraph provided that …’.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2020/C 295/04
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Norway, Spain, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, territorial waters








C_2020295EN.01000401.xml










7.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/4






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2020/C 295/04)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


18.8.2020




Duration


18.8.2020–31.12.2020




Member State


Spain




Stock or Group of stocks


COD/1N2AB.




Species


Cod (Gadus morhua)




Zone


Norwegian waters of 1 and 2




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


11/TQ123






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1
Case T-560/20: Action brought on 7 September 2020 — Yadex International v EUIPO — Sütas süt ürünleri (PINAR Tam kivaminda Süzme Peynir Yumusacik ve Leziz)
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, milk product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020371EN.01002202.xml










3.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 371/22






Action brought on 7 September 2020 — Yadex International v EUIPO — Sütas süt ürünleri (PINAR Tam kivaminda Süzme Peynir Yumusacik ve Leziz)
(Case T-560/20)
(2020/C 371/25)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Yadex International GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: N. Johnson, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sütas süt ürünleri AS (Bursa, Turkey)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark PINAR Tam kivaminda Süzme Peynir Yumusacik ve Leziz — International registration No 1 396 036

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2020 in Case R 2126/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and allow the applicant’s appeal of 23 September 2019 against the decision of the Opposition Division of 23 July 2019;










—


order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 4 September 2020 2020/C 295/02
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020295EN.01000201.xml










7.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

4 September 2020
(2020/C 295/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1842 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,79 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4403 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89325 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3688 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0793 




ISK


Iceland króna


164,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,5768 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,435 




HUF


Hungarian forint


359,60 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4514 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8528 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,8215 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6291 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5508 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1780 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7640 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6158 




KRW


South Korean won


1 409,07 




ZAR


South African rand


19,6278 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1006 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5390 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 453,41 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9138 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,530 




RUB


Russian rouble


88,9730 




THB


Thai baht


37,172 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2775 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,5275 




INR


Indian rupee


86,6780 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-945/19: Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘OC Finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, contract terms, cost of borrowing, deadline for payment








C_2020414EN.01002701.xml










30.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/27






Order of the President of the Court of 7 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘OC Finance’ v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs
(Case C-945/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/43)
Language of the case: Latvian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Case C-416/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 September 2020 — TR
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: extradition, legality, penalty, public prosecution, rights of the defence








C_2020390EN.01002202.xml










16.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 390/22






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 September 2020 — TR
(Case C-416/20)
(2020/C 390/32)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Person whose surrender is sought: TR

Other party: Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamburg

Question referred

In the case of decisions on the extradition for the purposes of criminal prosecution of a person convicted in absentia from a Member State of the European Union to another Member State, are the provisions of Directive 2016/343, (1) in particular Articles 8 and 9 thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that the legality of the extradition (in particular in a so-called case of absconding) depends on the fulfilment by the requesting State of the conditions laid down in the Directive?


(1)  Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ 2016 L 65, p. 1).
Case T-572/20: Action brought on 7 September 2020 — Spisto v Commission
Date: 2020-09-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), principle of legal certainty, professional qualifications, recruitment








C_2020371EN.01002701.xml










3.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 371/27






Action brought on 7 September 2020 — Spisto v Commission
(Case T-572/20)
(2020/C 371/31)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Amanda Spisto (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 24 September 2019 rejecting her request for review of competition EPSO/AD/371/19 — Field 1;










—


annul, in so far as is necessary, the decision dated 26 May 2020 rejecting the complaint;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging illegality of the competition notice on the basis of which the contested decision was adopted, on the ground that it breached the principles of legal certainty, transparency and predictability, not only in the assessment of the selection criteria but also as regards the ‘relevance’ to be assessed and found by the members of the EPSO selection board in the ‘talent screener’ test.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that no statement of reasons was given for the contested decision. The applicant submits that, after the EPSO selection board’s decision, it was not possible to ascertain from the contested decision how the assessment was made, the criteria that were used or the way in which relevance to questions was determined.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.