do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-542/20: Action brought on 27 August 2020 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO — Pfizer (RUXIMBLIS)
Date: 2020-08-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, health service, medical device, pesticide, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020339EN.01003201.xml










12.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 339/32






Action brought on 27 August 2020 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO — Pfizer (RUXIMBLIS)
(Case T-542/20)
(2020/C 339/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Stada Arzneimittel AG (Bad Vilbel, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pfizer Inc. (New York, New York, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark RUXIMBLIS — Application No. 17 865 738

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 June 2020 in Case R 1877/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-540/20: Action brought on 27 August 2020 — Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry v Commission
Date: 2020-08-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Egypt, countervailing charge, glass fibre, import (EU), originating product, rights of the defence








C_2020378EN.01003801.xml










9.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 378/38






Action brought on 27 August 2020 — Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry v Commission
(Case T-540/20)
(2020/C 378/48)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE (Ain Sukhna, Egypt) (represented by: B. Servais and V. Crochet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Application pursuant to Article 263(4) of the TFEU for the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/870 of 24 June 2020 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and definitively collecting the provisional countervailing duty imposed on imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt, and levying the definitive countervailing duty on the registered imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt, in as far as it relates to the applicant;










—


order the defendant and any intervener who may be allowed to support the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s decision to countervail financial contributions granted to the applicant by Chinese public bodies violates Articles 2(a), 2(b), 3(1)(a), 4(2), 4(3) and 28 of the Basic Regulation and the Government of Egypt’s right of defence.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s decision regarding the provision of land to the applicant violates its rights of defence and Article 30 of the Basic Regulation as well as Articles 3(2), 5 and 6(d) of the Basic Regulation.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s decision to countervail the import tariff rebate scheme for imported materials used by Jushi for sales of glass fibre products to its domestic related customer violates Articles 3(1)(a)(ii), 3(2) and 5 of the Basic Regulation.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s decision to countervail the tax treatment of foreign exchange losses violates Articles 3(2) and 4(2)(c) of the Basic Regulation.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging that the Commission’s methodology for the determination of the undercutting margin with regard to the Applicant violates Articles 1(1), 2(d), 8(1), 8(2) and 8(5) of the Basic Regulation.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2020/C 283/02
Date: 2020-08-27
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, epidemic, infectious disease, package travel, provision of services








C_2020283EN.01000201.xml










27.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/2






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2020/C 283/02)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


20.5.2020




Case No


85199




Decision No


046/20/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title


COVID-19 Subsidised loan scheme for package travel traders




Legal basis


The legal basis of the scheme will be the Parliamentary Decision authorising the subsidised loan scheme.
The terms and conditions for the state subsidised individual loan agreements will be set out in a letter of assignment and term sheet issued by the Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries to Innovation Norway.




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


To: (i) ensure that sufficient liquidity remains available for traders in the package travel market; (ii) ensure the quickest possible settlement of refunds or reimbursements to package travellers; and (iii) preserve the continuity of economic activity during and after the COVID-19 outbreak, by means of subsidised interest rates for loans.




Form of aid


Subsidised loans




Budget


NOK 2 billion




Duration


25.5.2020 – 15.9.2020




Economic sectors


Package travel




Name and address of the granting authority







Innovation Norway




Akersgata 13




0104 Oslo




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Case T-549/20: Action brought on 27 August 2020 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS)
Date: 2020-08-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, decorative item, office supplies, online game, paperboard, registered trade mark, sports equipment, teaching materials, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2020348EN.01002502.xml










19.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 348/25






Action brought on 27 August 2020 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS)
(Case T-549/20)
(2020/C 348/36)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Magic Box Int. Toys SLU (Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: KMA Concepts Ltd. (Hong Kong, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark SUPERZINGS — EU trade mark No 16 164 204

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2020 in Case R 2511/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order any party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9877 – Pro Diagnostic Group/FutureLife/DISCARE CZ JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 291/01
Date: 2020-08-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, medical centre, medical diagnosis, merger control








C_2020291EN.01000101.xml










2.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 291/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9877 – Pro Diagnostic Group/FutureLife/DISCARE CZ JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 291/01)
On 27 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9877. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
SMEs, start-ups, scale-ups and entrepreneurship : summary.
Date: 2020-08-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Communication
Subjects: EU Member State, company growth, digitisation, entrepreneurship, financing, innovation, opinion poll, report, sample survey, small and medium-sized enterprises, start-up, sustainable development

 
▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

 
 
▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

 
▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

 
▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪ 

▪
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 26 August 2020 2020/C 283/01
Date: 2020-08-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020283EN.01000101.xml










27.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

26 August 2020
(2020/C 283/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1789 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,34 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4439 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89690 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3348 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0738 




ISK


Iceland króna


163,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,5603 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,262 




HUF


Hungarian forint


354,74 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4074 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8419 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,6706 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6371 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5543 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1368 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7971 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6130 




KRW


South Korean won


1 398,97 




ZAR


South African rand


19,7996 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1262 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5273 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 297,41 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9160 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,264 




RUB


Russian rouble


89,3568 




THB


Thai baht


36,947 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5317 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,8750 




INR


Indian rupee


87,6130 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9878 – Total/EDP Comercializadora) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 292/01
Date: 2020-08-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, electricity supply, energy industry, energy production, gas industry, gas supply, merger control, oil industry, power plant








C_2020292EN.01000101.xml










3.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 292/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9878 – Total/EDP Comercializadora)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 292/01)
On 27 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9878. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.