do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Information concerning the entry into force of the Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia
Date: 2020-08-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Croatia, Georgia, accession to the European Union, agreement (EU), air transport, protocol to an agreement, revision of an agreement








L_2020275EN.01000201.xml










24.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 275/2







Information concerning the entry into force of the Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

The Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia, signed in Brussels on 26 November 2014, entered into force on 2 August 2020, in accordance with Article 3(1) of the Protocol, as the last notification was deposited on 2 July 2020.
Case C-401/20 P: Appeal brought on 24 August 2020 by Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 10 June 2020 in Case T-577/19, Leinfelder Uhren München v EUIPO
Date: 2020-08-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021072EN.01001002.xml










1.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/10






Appeal brought on 24 August 2020 by Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 10 June 2020 in Case T-577/19, Leinfelder Uhren München v EUIPO
(Case C-401/20 P)
(2021/C 72/13)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: S. Lüft, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Thomas Schafft
By order of 19 January 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 21 August 2020 2020/C 278/03
Date: 2020-08-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020278EN.01000301.xml










24.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

21 August 2020
(2020/C 278/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1769 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,53 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4441 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89755 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3630 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0744 




ISK


Iceland króna


162,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,5913 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,083 




HUF


Hungarian forint


350,68 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3979 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8405 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,5925 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6442 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5563 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1212 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8045 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6131 




KRW


South Korean won


1 403,15 




ZAR


South African rand


20,2977 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1483 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5243 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 383,99 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9194 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,324 




RUB


Russian rouble


87,7350 




THB


Thai baht


37,161 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5908 




MXN


Mexican peso


26,0660 




INR


Indian rupee


88,1980 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-402/20 P: Appeal brought on 24 August 2020 by Lípidos Santiga, SA against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 11 June 2020 in Case T-561/19, Lípidos Santiga v Commission
Date: 2020-08-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: biofuel, energy consumption, land use, renewable energy, renewable resources, single market, soil protection, vegetable oil








C_2020348EN.01001201.xml










19.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 348/12






Appeal brought on 24 August 2020 by Lípidos Santiga, SA against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 11 June 2020 in Case T-561/19, Lípidos Santiga v Commission
(Case C-402/20 P)
(2020/C 348/17)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Lípidos Santiga, SA (represented by: P. Muñiz Fernández, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2020, Lipidos Santiga v Commission (case T-561/19) notified to the appellant on 12 June 2020, insofar as it dismissed the action as inadmissible;










—


declare the action brought by the Appellant admissible and refer the case back to the General Court to rule on the merits of the case; and










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings and of the proceedings before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

First ground of appeal: The General Court erred in law in finding that the Appellant’s situation is not affected by the European Union’s exclusion of palm oil biofuel from the EU market.






A.


In omitting to examine whether there is a market for palm oil biofuel outside the REDII (1) mandatory targets, the General Court failed to state sufficient grounds.










B.


The General Court erred in law in concluding that the contested provisions do not trigger the express prohibition contained in Article 26(2) of RED II concerning the use palm oil biofuel.










C.


The General Court erred in law in finding that, as a consequence of the low ILUC-risk exception, the Appellant is not directly affected by the contested provisions.




Second ground of appeal: The General Court erred in law in finding that Member States have discretion to implement the prohibition in Article 26(2) of RED II triggered by the contested provisions.
Third ground of appeal: The General Court’s legal characterisation of the effects on the Appellant’s situation arising from the contested provisions, as well as its interpretation and application of the direct concern test, are manifestly erroneous.


(1)  Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ 2018, L 328, p. 82).
Information concerning the entry into force of the Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia
Date: 2020-08-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Croatia, Israel, Mediterranean region (EU), Union for the Mediterranean, accession to the European Union, agreement (EU), air transport, protocol to an agreement, revision of an agreement








L_2020275EN.01000101.xml










24.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 275/1







Information concerning the entry into force of the Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

The Protocol amending the Euro-Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Government of the State of Israel, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia, signed in Brussels on 19 February 2015, entered into force on 2 August 2020, in accordance with Article 3(1) of the Protocol, as the last notification was deposited on 2 July 2020.
Case C-663/19: Order of the President of the Court of 24 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Gera — Germany) — MM v Volkswagen AG
Date: 2020-08-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EC conformity marking, approval, defective product, market approval, motor vehicle, motor vehicle pollution, pollution control measures, transfer of property, used goods, vehicle parts








C_2020414EN.01002502.xml










30.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/25






Order of the President of the Court of 24 August 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Gera — Germany) — MM v Volkswagen AG
(Case C-663/19) (1)

(2020/C 414/37)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.