do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-500/20: Action brought on 10 August 2020 — Selmikeit & Giczella v EUIPO — Boehmert & Boehmert (HALLOWIENER)
Date: 2020-08-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, meat, prepared foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020329EN.01001902.xml










5.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/19






Action brought on 10 August 2020 — Selmikeit & Giczella v EUIPO — Boehmert & Boehmert (HALLOWIENER)
(Case T-500/20)
(2020/C 329/38)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Selmikeit & Giczella GmbH (Osterode, Germany) (represented by: S. Keute, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Boehmert & Boehmert Anwaltspartnerschaft mbB — Patentanwälte Rechtsanwälte (Bremen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark HALLOWIENER — European Union trade mark No 9 369 489

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 May 2020 in Case R 1893/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and reject the application for revocation of contested mark No 9 369 489 HALLOWIENER.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-375/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Coimbra (Portugal) lodged on 10 August 2020 — Liberty Seguros SA v DR
Date: 2020-08-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of passengers, insurance company, insurance contract, motor vehicle, motor vehicle insurance, third-party insurance








C_2020348EN.01001001.xml










19.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 348/10






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Coimbra (Portugal) lodged on 10 August 2020 — Liberty Seguros SA v DR
(Case C-375/20)
(2020/C 348/14)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação de Coimbra

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Liberty Seguros SA

Defendant: DR

Interveners: Fundo de Garantia Automóvel, VS, FN, JT, Seguradoras Unidas, SA

Question referred

Does [EU] law, and in particular Directive 2009/103/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council, preclude national legislation which allows the nullity of a contract of insurance taken out against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles to be relied on as against injured third parties and the Fundo de Garantia Automóvel (Portuguese motor vehicle insurance guarantee fund) where that nullity results from the fact that the policyholder has used the insured vehicle for the clandestine and illegal transport of persons and goods for remuneration and has concealed its use for that purpose from the insurer? Would the answer be the same even if the passengers had known that the transport was clandestine and unlawful?


(1)  Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ 2009 L 263, p. 11).
Case T-501/20: Action brought on 10 August 2020 — Makk v EUIPO — Ubati Luxury Cosmetics (PANTA RHEI)
Date: 2020-08-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, eye disease, food supplement, non-alcoholic beverage, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2020320EN.01002801.xml










28.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/28






Action brought on 10 August 2020 — Makk v EUIPO — Ubati Luxury Cosmetics (PANTA RHEI)
(Case T-501/20)
(2020/C 320/59)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Stefan Makk (Graz, Austria) (represented by: I. Hödl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ubati Luxury Cosmetics, SL (Alcobendas, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark PANTA RHEI — International registration designating the European Union No 1 393 404

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 June 2020 in Case R 2337/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and eventually the intervener to pay the costs incurred with the present proceeding before the Court.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-502/20: Action brought on 10 August 2020 — Munich v EUIPO — Tone Watch (MUNICH10A.T.M.)
Date: 2020-08-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, clock and watch industry, electronic commerce, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, optical industry, precious metal, precious stones, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020329EN.01002001.xml










5.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/20






Action brought on 10 August 2020 — Munich v EUIPO — Tone Watch (MUNICH10A.T.M.)
(Case T-502/20)
(2020/C 329/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Munich, SL (La Torre de Claramunt, Spain) (represented by: M. Guix Vilanova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tone Watch, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. — European Union trade mark No 10 727 899

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2020 in Case R 2472/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:
Annul the contested decision and declare Community trade mark MUNICH10A.T.M. No. 10 727 899, of which Importaciones Issar, S.L. is the owner, invalid in relation to goods in Classes 9 (Sunglasses), 14 (Horological and chronometric instruments, boxes for watches (presentation)) and 35 (Wholesaling, retailing and sale via global computer networks of sunglasses, precious metals and their alloys, jewellery, horological and chronometric instruments) of the International Classification, uphold that decision in so far as it declares the mark invalid with respect to services in Class 35 (Advertising, Business management, Business administration, Office functions), uphold the cross-appeal and cancel the registration of the mark in relation to goods in Classes 14, namely, precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes, and 35, rental of vending machines, and order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law







—


The contested decision did not find that the earlier marks with the common element ‘MUNICH’ have a reputation and wrongly concluded that Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council is not applicable in the present case;










—


There is a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public in relation to the marks at issue;










—


The reasoning given in the contested decision as regards the rejection of the cross-appeal, namely that it was not lodged by a separate document, is an excessive formal restriction, since that cross-appeal is stated clearly and expressly, and prevents the applicant from asserting its rights of defence.
Case T-503/20: Action brought on 10 August 2020 — T & D Control systems v EUIPO — Sigmatron (Signalling apparatus and devices)
Date: 2020-08-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, lighting equipment, signalling device








C_2020329EN.01002101.xml










5.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/21






Action brought on 10 August 2020 — T & D Control systems v EUIPO — Sigmatron (Signalling apparatus and devices)
(Case T-503/20)
(2020/C 329/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: Bulgarian

Parties


Applicant: T & D Control systems EOOD (Varna, Bulgaria) (represented by: P. Priparzhenski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sigmatron EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant

Design at issue: Community design 3065887-0001 (Signalling apparatus and devices)

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 April 2020 in Case R 956/2019-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in its entirety;










—


order Sigmatron EOOD to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings, totalling EUR 4 700 in accordance with the cost specification annexed to the application.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 28(1) and 30(1) of Regulation No 2245/2002 and Article 52 of Regulation No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 and departure from EUIPO's established practice as regards their application.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 7 August 2020 2020/C 261/01
Date: 2020-08-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020261EN.01000101.xml










10.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 261/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

7 August 2020
(2020/C 261/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1817 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,91 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4483 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90373 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3163 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0804 




ISK


Iceland króna


160,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,6433 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,279 




HUF


Hungarian forint


345,93 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4081 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8374 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,5019 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6403 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5770 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1585 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7786 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6203 




KRW


South Korean won


1 401,90 




ZAR


South African rand


20,7086 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2238 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4595 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 335,54 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9484 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,958 




RUB


Russian rouble


86,9753 




THB


Thai baht


36,816 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3274 




MXN


Mexican peso


26,5127 




INR


Indian rupee


88,6330 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9831 — OMV/Borealis) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 268/02
Date: 2020-08-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, gas industry, gas pipeline, merger control, oil industry, storage of hydrocarbons








C_2020268EN.01000201.xml










14.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 268/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9831 — OMV/Borealis)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 268/02)
On 10 August 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9831. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1200 of 10 August 2020 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Berthoud’ (TSG))
Date: 2020-08-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: France, designation of origin, labelling, prepared foodstuff, product designation








L_2020269EN.01000101.xml










17.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 269/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1200
of 10 August 2020
         
entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Berthoud’ (TSG))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Berthoud’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Berthoud’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Berthoud’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.21. – prepared meals, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 August 2020.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 115, 7.4.2020, p. 16.

(3)  Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).