do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-349/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 29 July 2020 — NB, AB v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Intervenor: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Palestine, UNRWA, aid to refugees, disabled person, foreign national, refugee, right of asylum, stateless person








C_2021062EN.01001102.xml










22.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 62/11






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 29 July 2020 — NB, AB v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Intervenor: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(Case C-349/20)
(2021/C 62/12)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: NB, AB

Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department

Intervenor: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

Questions referred

In assessing whether there has been a cessation of protection or assistance from UNRWA (1) within the meaning of the second sentence of Article 12(1) (a) of the QD (2) to an UNRWA-registered stateless Palestinian in respect of the assistance afforded to disabled persons:






1.


Is the assessment purely an historic exercise of considering the circumstances which are said to have forced an applicant to leave the UNRWA area of operations when he did, or is it also an ex nunc, forward-looking assessment of whether the applicant can avail himself of such protection or assistance presently?










2.


If the answer to Question 1 is that assessment includes a forward-looking assessment, is it legitimate to rely analogically on the cessation clause in Article 11, so that where historically the applicant can show a qualifying reason as to why he or she left the UNRWA area, the evidential burden falls upon the Member State to show that such reason no longer holds?










3.


In order for there to be justifiable objective reasons for the departure of such a person related to UNRW[A]'s provision of protection or assistance, is it necessary to establish intentional infliction of harm or deprivation of assistance (by act or omission) on the part of UNRWA or the state in which it operates?










4.


Is it relevant to take into account the assistance provided to such persons by civil society actors such as NGOs?






(1)  United Nations Relief and Works Association.

(2)  Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (the Qualification Directive; hereafter: ‘QD’)(OJ 2004, L 304, p. 12).
Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2020/649 2020/C 249/03
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: international convention, international organisation, international transport, rail transport, revision of an agreement, technical regulations, technological change, transport of dangerous goods, transport regulations, transport safety








C_2020249EN.01000701.xml










29.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/7






Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2020/649
(2020/C 249/03)
Pursuant to Article 2 of Council Decision (EU) 2020/649 of 7 May 2020 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union during the 56th session of the Committee of Experts for the Carriage of Dangerous Goods of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail as regards certain amendments to Appendix C to the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (1), the Commission informs that the decisions taken at the body and applicable from 1 January 2021 are available at:
http://otif.org/fileadmin/new/2-Activities/2D-Dangerous-Goods/2Df-Notifications/2021/NOT-RID-20016-e-amendments_2021_RID.pdf


(1)  OJ L 153, 15.5.2020, p. 1.
Case C-531/19: Order of the President of the Court of 29 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — PO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: foreign national, imprisonment, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, offence, removal, residence permit








C_2020329EN.01001001.xml










5.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/10






Order of the President of the Court of 29 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha — Spain) — PO v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real
(Case C-531/19) (1)

(2020/C 329/15)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1154 of 29 July 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ (PDO)
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Little Poland province, Poland, designation of origin, honey, labelling, product designation








L_2020255EN.01000101.xml










5.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 255/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1154
of 29 July 2020
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ (PDO)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.4 – Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 July 2020.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 336, 7.10.2019, p. 7.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9796 — Uniqa/AXA (Insurance, Asset Management and Pensions - Czechia, Poland and Slovakia)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 332/01
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, Poland, Slovakia, economic concentration, foundation, insurance, investment bank, investment company, merger control








C_2020332EN.01000101.xml










8.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 332/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9796 — Uniqa/AXA (Insurance, Asset Management and Pensions - Czechia, Poland and Slovakia))
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 332/01)
On 29 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9796. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9831 – OMV/Borealis) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 249/04
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, gas industry, gas pipeline, merger control, oil industry, storage of hydrocarbons








C_2020249EN.01000801.xml










29.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/8






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9831 – OMV/Borealis)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 249/04)

1.   
On 6 July 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


OMV Aktiengesellschaft (‘OMV’, Austria),










—


Borealis AG (‘Borealis’, Austria).




OMV acquires sole control within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation over Borealis.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


OMV is globally active in the exploration, development and production of oil and gas. It also operates refineries in Austria, Germany and Romania, which produce and sell LPG, jet fuel, naphtha, gasoline, diesel, light fuel oil, heavy fuel oil, sulphur and calcined coke; trades and sells gas and owns a pipe-line network and gas storage facilities in Austria,










—


Borealis is active in the production and commercialisation of polyolefins, base chemicals and fertilisers. It is currently jointly controlled by OMV and Mubadala Investment Company, Abu Dhabi, UAE (‘Mubadala’, UAE).






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9831 – OMV/Borealis
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301





Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case C-391/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 29 July 2020 — Boriss Cilevičs and Others v Latvijas Republikas Saeima
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: freedom to provide services, national identity, official language, principle of proportionality, right of establishment








C_2020359EN.01000602.xml










26.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/6






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 29 July 2020 — Boriss Cilevičs and Others v Latvijas Republikas Saeima
(Case C-391/20)
(2020/C 359/10)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Satversmes tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Boriss Cilevičs, Valērijs Agešins, Vjačeslavs Dombrovskis, Vladimirs Nikonovs, Artūrs Rubiks, Ivans Ribakovs, Nikolajs Kabanovs, Igors Pimenovs, Vitālijs Orlovs, Edgars Kucins, Ivans Klementjevs, Inga Goldberga, Evija Papule, Jānis Krišāns, Jānis Urbanovičs, Ļubova Švecova, Sergejs Dolgopolovs, Andrejs Klementjevs, Regīna Ločmele-Luņova, Ivars Zariņš

Institution whose act is contested: Latvijas Republikas Saeima

Questions referred







1.


Does legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings constitute a restriction on the freedom of establishment enshrined in Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or, in the alternative, on the freedom to provide services guaranteed in Article 56 [of that treaty], and on the freedom to conduct a business recognised in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?










2.


What considerations should be taken into account when assessing whether the legislation in question is justified, suitable and proportionate with regard to its legitimate purpose of protecting the official language as a manifestation of national identity?
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 28 July 2020 2020/C 249/02
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020249EN.01000601.xml










29.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

28 July 2020
(2020/C 249/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1717 




JPY


Japanese yen


123,34 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4429 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90968 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2820 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0758 




ISK


Iceland króna


158,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,6940 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,251 




HUF


Hungarian forint


346,98 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4054 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8355 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,1283 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6412 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5693 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,0810 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7630 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6168 




KRW


South Korean won


1 406,13 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4315 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2041 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5070 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 030,66 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9827 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,664 




RUB


Russian rouble


84,8413 




THB


Thai baht


36,920 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0650 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,8438 




INR


Indian rupee


87,7140 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Adoption of amendments to the Rules of Procedure of Eurojust 2020/C 249 I/01
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation
Subjects: Eurojust, data protection, personal data, rules of procedure








CI2020249EN.01000101.xml










29.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 249/1






Adoption of amendments to the Rules of Procedure of Eurojust
(2020/C 249 I/01)
The College of Eurojust has adopted on 24 July 2020 amendments to Eurojust’s Rules of Procedure (1). Those amendments are attached to Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1114 of 23 July 2020 (2).



For the College of Eurojust,

Ladislav HAMRAN

President of Eurojust





(1)  Approved by the Council by Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/2250 of 19 December 2019 (OJ L 336, 30.12.2019, p. 309) and adopted by the College on 20 December 2019 (OJ L 50, 24.2.2020, p. 1.).

(2)  OJ L 244, 29.7.2020, p. 13
Corrigendum to the prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9884 – Thoma Bravo/Madison Dearborn Partners/Axiom) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Official Journal of the European Union C 219 of 3 July 2020) 2020/C 249/05
Date: 2020-07-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: cloud computing, consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, software








C_2020249EN.01001001.xml










29.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 249/10






Corrigendum to the prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9884 – Thoma Bravo/Madison Dearborn Partners/Axiom) Candidate case for simplified procedure

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 219 of 3 July 2020
)

(2020/C 249/05)
On page 17, point 1, first line:
for:

‘On 25 June 2020’,

read:

‘On 26 June 2020’.