do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9868 — Raytheon Technologies Corporation/Saudi Arabian Oil Company/Middle East Cyber Services JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 422/01
Date: 2020-07-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aerospace industry, company with share capital, defence policy, economic concentration, information security, merger control, mining industry, provision of services








C_2020422EN.01000101.xml










7.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 422/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9868 — Raytheon Technologies Corporation/Saudi Arabian Oil Company/Middle East Cyber Services JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 422/01)
On 10 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9868. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-619/19: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — KF v SatCen (Action for annulment and for damages — Staff of SatCen — Members of the contract staff — Jurisdiction of the EU Courts — Common foreign and security policy — Decision to launch administrative investigations in respect of the applicant pursuant to a judgment of the General Court — Acts adversely affecting an official — Claim for interest on a sum awarded by the General Court as compensation for the harm suffered — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2020-07-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, disciplinary proceedings, indemnification, interest, personality, right to justice, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_2020348EN.01001501.xml










19.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 348/15






Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — KF v SatCen
(Case T-619/19) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Staff of SatCen - Members of the contract staff - Jurisdiction of the EU Courts - Common foreign and security policy - Decision to launch administrative investigations in respect of the applicant pursuant to a judgment of the General Court - Acts adversely affecting an official - Claim for interest on a sum awarded by the General Court as compensation for the harm suffered - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly inadmissible)
(2020/C 348/21)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: KF (represented by: N. Macaulay, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Satellite Centre (represented by: A. Guillerme, lawyer)

Re:

Application, first, based on Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the decision of the Director of SatCen of 3 July 2019 to launch investigations concerning the applicant and, second, based on Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant, in particular as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


KF shall pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.










3.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Council of the European Union.










4.


Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Case T-436/20: Action brought on 10 July 2020 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+)
Date: 2020-07-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, furniture industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020279EN.01006301.xml










24.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/63






Action brought on 10 July 2020 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+)
(Case T-436/20)
(2020/C 279/78)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Sedus Stoll AG (Dogern, Germany) (represented by: M. Goldmann and J. Thomsen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wolfgang Kappes (Bochum, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ — Application for registration No 15 958 374

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 March 2020 in Case R 2194/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


dismiss the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division in Case No B 2 863 929; and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union and order the potential intervener (Wolfgang Kappes) to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings before EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9830 – Avacon Natur/NEW AG/Stadtenfalter JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 270/02
Date: 2020-07-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: air conditioning, economic concentration, electrical energy, energy industry, gas industry, heating, merger control, power plant, smart city








C_2020270EN.01000201.xml










17.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9830 – Avacon Natur/NEW AG/Stadtenfalter JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 270/02)
On 10 July 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9830. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-313/20 P: Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Abarca — Companhia de Seguros SA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-106/19, Abarca v EUIPO — Abanca Corporación Bancaria (ABARCA SEGUROS)
Date: 2020-07-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, financial services, insurance, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020414EN.01002103.xml










30.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/21






Appeal brought on 10 July 2020 by Abarca — Companhia de Seguros SA against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-106/19, Abarca v EUIPO — Abanca Corporación Bancaria (ABARCA SEGUROS)
(Case C-313/20 P)
(2020/C 414/29)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Abarca — Companhia de Seguros SA (represented by: J. M. Pimenta, advogado, Á. Pinho, advogada)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Abanca Corporación Bancaria, SA
By order of 13 October 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and ordered Abarca — Companhia de Seguros SA to bear its own costs.