do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-67/19: Order of the President of the Court of 29 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság) — Hungary) — KD v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: judicial proceedings, right of asylum, right to justice








C_2020329EN.01000901.xml










5.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/9






Order of the President of the Court of 29 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság) — Hungary) — KD v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal
(Case C-67/19) (1)

(2020/C 329/12)
Language of the case: Hungarian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9853 — HGK/Imperial Shipping Group) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 344/07
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: after-sales service, economic concentration, inland waterway transport, logistics, maritime transport, merger control, motor vehicle industry, rail transport








C_2020344EN.01000701.xml










16.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/7






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9853 — HGK/Imperial Shipping Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 344/07)
On 29 June 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9853. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-400/20: Action brought on 29 June 2020 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Rudolf Böckenholt (LLOYD’S)
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020262EN.01003701.xml










10.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/37






Action brought on 29 June 2020 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Rudolf Böckenholt (LLOYD’S)
(Case T-400/20)
(2020/C 262/50)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rudolf Böckenholt GmbH & Co. KG (Ostbevern, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark LLOYD’S — EU trade mark No 2 957 132

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 April 2020 in Case R 1119/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision, inasmuch as, by dismissing the appeal brought by El Corte Inglés, S.A., it upholds the decision of the Cancellation Division partially upholding application No 18 381 C for a declaration of invalidity, and upholds the partial invalidity of EU trade mark No 2 957 132 LLOYD’S (figurative) for ‘goods made of these materials (leather and imitation of leather) and not included in other classes, excluding leather used for making footwear’ in Class 18;










—


order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.










—


Contradiction with the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO in Case R 562/2006-1 of 23 October 2009.










—


Contradiction and lack of consistency of the decision as regards the arguments on which it is based, and infringement of Article 32(i) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430.
Case T-394/20: Action brought on 29 June 2020 — Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, access to EU information, bank, banking supervision, financing plan, fund (EU), principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2020271EN.01004601.xml










17.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/46






Action brought on 29 June 2020 — Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB
(Case T-394/20)
(2020/C 271/58)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger und A. Brenneis, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 15 April 2020 on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2020/24), including the annexes thereto, in any event in so far as the contested decision, including the annexes thereto, concerns the contribution to be paid by the applicant; and










—


order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are essentially identical or similar to the pleas in law put forward in Case T-479/19, Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB. (1).


(1)  OJ 2019 C 305, p. 58
Council Decision (EU) 2020/961 of 29 June 2020 granting Mr Jeppe Tranholm-Mikkelsen authorisation for access to information classified up to level TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Council of the European Union, Denmark, European Council, European official, access to EU information, confidentiality, data protection, disclosure of information, professional secret, protection of communications




L_2020211EN.01001801.xml










3.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/18








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/961
of 29 June 2020
         
granting Mr Jeppe Tranholm-Mikkelsen authorisation for access to information classified up to level TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/488/EU of 23 September 2013 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information (1), and in particular point (a) of paragraph 18 of Annex I thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2017/262 of 6 February 2017 determining, for the General Secretariat of the Council, the appointing authority and the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment, and repealing Decision 2013/811/EU (2),


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2020/618 of 30 April 2020 appointing the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2025 (3),

Whereas:







(1)


The competent Danish national security authority gave a positive assurance on 11 June 2020 with regard to access to information classified up to level TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET by Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN.












(2)


It is necessary, owing to his assignment and the needs of the service, to authorise Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN to have access to information classified up to level TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET held by the Council and the European Council,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

1.   Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN is hereby granted authorisation for access to information classified up to level TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET held by the Council and the European Council for the purposes of his assignment.


2.   The authorisation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be valid for the duration of the assignment for which this authorisation is granted and shall not exceed a period of five years, starting from the date this Decision takes effect.



Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on 1 July 2020.


Article 3
This Decision is addressed to Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN.




Done at Brussels, 29 June 2020.


For the Council


The President

A. METELKO-ZGOMBIĆ
            





(1)  
            OJ L 274, 15.10.2013, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 39, 16.2.2017, p. 4.

(3)  
            OJ L 143, 6.5.2020, p. 11.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 26 June 2020 2020/C 214/07
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020214EN.01000701.xml










29.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 214/7






Euro exchange rates (1)

26 June 2020
(2020/C 214/07)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1213 




JPY


Japanese yen


119,93 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4523 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90575 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4773 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0631 




ISK


Iceland króna


155,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,8850 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,808 




HUF


Hungarian forint


355,15 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4684 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8426 




TRY


Turkish lira


7,6865 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6313 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5318 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6904 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7428 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5608 




KRW


South Korean won


1 346,19 




ZAR


South African rand


19,3799 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9298 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5575 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 944,89 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8115 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,053 




RUB


Russian rouble


77,8800 




THB


Thai baht


34,674 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0595 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,5836 




INR


Indian rupee


84,8215 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9677 – DIC/BASF Colors & Effects) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 214/06
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: dyestuffs industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2020214EN.01000601.xml










29.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 214/6






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.9677 – DIC/BASF Colors & Effects)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 214/06)
Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004
On 15 May 2020, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).
On 23 June 2020, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.


(1)  OJ C 177, 27.5.2020, p. 5.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/907 of 29 June 2020 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, territorial dispute




L_2020207EN.01003701.xml










30.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 207/37








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2020/907
of 29 June 2020
         
amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1).












(2)


On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 December 2015.












(3)


On 19 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/2192 (2), renewing Decision 2014/512/CFSP until 31 July 2020 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements.












(4)


Having assessed the implementation of the Minsk agreements, the Council considers that Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further six months in order to enable the Council to further assess their implementation.












(5)


Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP is replaced by the following:


‘1.   This Decision shall apply until 31 January 2021.’.




Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 29 June 2020.


For the Council


The President

A. METELKO-ZGOMBIĆ
            





(1)  Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 13).

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/2192 of 19 December 2019 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 330, 20.12.2019, p. 71).
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1413 of 29 June 2020 correcting the Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: classification, dangerous substance, environmental protection, labelling, packaging, public health








L_2020326EN.01000101.xml










8.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 326/1








            COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2020/1413
of 29 June 2020
         
correcting the Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1), and in particular Article 53(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Swedish language version of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 contains an erroneous value in the first and second rows of Category Chronic 3, in point (b)(iii) in Table 4.1.0 of Annex I.












(2)


The Swedish language version of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
(does not concern the English version)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 June 2020.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1.
Case C-284/20 P: Appeal brought on 29 June 2020 by Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-73/19, Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag v EUIPO — Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen (Wood-splitting tool)
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, hand tool, wood industry








C_2020414EN.01002102.xml










30.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/21






Appeal brought on 29 June 2020 by Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 29 April 2020 in Case T-73/19, Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag v EUIPO — Scheppach Fabrikation von Holzbearbeitungsmaschinen (Wood-splitting tool)
(Case C-284/20 P)
(2020/C 414/28)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag (represented by: S. Kirschstein-Freund, B. Breitinger, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 6 October 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and ordered Bergslagernas Järnvaruaktiebolag to bear its own costs.
Case C-286/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2020 — GC, WG v Société Air France SA
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, indemnification








C_2020287EN.01003001.xml










31.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/30






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2020 — GC, WG v Société Air France SA
(Case C-286/20)
(2020/C 287/47)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: GC, WG

Defendant: Société Air France SA
This case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 15 July 2020.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/906 of 29 June 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/615 on Union support for activities leading up to the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: international conference, international convention, non-proliferation of arms, nuclear energy, nuclear non-proliferation, nuclear safety, nuclear weapon, peaceful use of energy, the EU's international role








L_2020207EN.01003601.xml










30.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 207/36








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2020/906
of 29 June 2020
         
amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/615 on Union support for activities leading up to the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) and Article 31(1) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 15 April 2019, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/615 (1), which provides for an 18-month implementation period from the date of conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in that Decision, for the activities referred to in Article 1 thereof.












(2)


The United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs requested an extension until 16 April 2021 of the implementation period of Decision (CFSP) 2019/615. The requested extension is due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the temporary suspension of activities under Decision (CFSP) 2019/615.












(3)


The continuation of the activities referred to in Article 1 of Decision (CFSP) 2019/615 can be performed without any financial resource implication until 16 April 2021.












(4)


Decision (CFSP) 2019/615 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Article 5(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2019/615 is replaced by the following:






‘2.


This Decision shall expire 24 months after the date of conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in Article 3(3) or six months after the date of its adoption if no financing agreement has been concluded within that period.’.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 29 June 2020.


For the Council


The President

A. METELKO-ZGOMBIĆ
            





(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/615 of 15 April 2019 on Union support for activities leading up to the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) (OJ L 105, 16.4.2019, p. 25).
Case C-285/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 29 June 2020 — K v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv)
Date: 2020-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, residence, social security legislation, unemployed person, unemployment insurance








C_2020313EN.01001202.xml










21.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 313/12






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 29 June 2020 — K v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv)
(Case C-285/20)
(2020/C 313/15)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: K

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv)

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 65(2) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a wholly unemployed person who has transferred his place of residence from the competent Member State to another Member State while receiving a benefit as referred to in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, and/or before his employment relationship has been terminated, is entitled to unemployment benefit under the legislation of the Member State in which he resides?










2.


Are the reasons for which the unemployed person has transferred his residence to a Member State other than the competent Member State, for example, on family grounds, relevant in that regard?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).