do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-277/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 June 2020 — UM
Date: 2020-06-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, Germany, contract, gift, inheritance, law of succession, real property, residence








C_2020313EN.01001201.xml










21.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 313/12






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 24 June 2020 — UM
(Case C-277/20)
(2020/C 313/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: UM

Other parties to the proceedings: HW as administrator of the estate of ZL, Marktgemeinde Kötschach-Mauthen, Finanzamt Spittal Villach

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a contract of donation mortis causa entered into between two German nationals habitually resident in Germany in respect of real estate located in Austria, granting the donee a right having the character of an obligation against the estate to registration of his title after the donor’s death pursuant to that contract and the donor’s death certificate, that is without the intervention of the probate court, is an agreement as to succession within the meaning of that provision?










2.


If the answer to the above question is in the affirmative:
Is Article 83(2) of Regulation No 650/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that it also regulates the effect of a choice of applicable law made before 17 August 2015 for a contract of donation mortis causa that is to be qualified as an agreement as to succession within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the regulation?






(1)  OJ 2012 L 201, p. 107.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures 2020/C 210/07
Date: 2020-06-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: India, anti-dumping duty, cast-iron, import (EU), originating product, piping, tube








C_2020210EN.01002901.xml










24.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 210/29






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2020/C 210/07)

1.   

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.



2.   

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.


3.   

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.


4.   
This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron)


India


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India
(OJ L 73, 18.3.2016, p. 53).


19.3.2021







(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 23 June 2020 2020/C 210/04
Date: 2020-06-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020210EN.01002601.xml










24.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 210/26






Euro exchange rates (1)

23 June 2020
(2020/C 210/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1318 




JPY


Japanese yen


121,05 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4537 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90630 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5175 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0705 




ISK


Iceland króna


156,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,7345 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,612 




HUF


Hungarian forint


350,43 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4371 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8438 




TRY


Turkish lira


7,7622 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6272 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5269 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7716 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7391 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5743 




KRW


South Korean won


1 366,51 




ZAR


South African rand


19,4719 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9944 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5770 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 026,29 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8390 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,685 




RUB


Russian rouble


77,7474 




THB


Thai baht


34,995 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,9006 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,2497 




INR


Indian rupee


85,4380 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-231/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 June 2020 — Price v Council (Interim measures — Area of freedom, security and justice — Decision (EU) 2020/135 — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom — Loss of EU citizenship — Application for suspension of operation — Manifest inadmissibility of the main action — Inadmissibility — Referral to the Court of Justice — Not competent)
Date: 2020-06-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU national, European citizenship, United Kingdom, discrimination on the basis of nationality, free movement of persons, political rights, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, social rights, withdrawal from the EU








C_2020313EN.01002802.xml










21.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 313/28






Order of the President of the General Court of 24 June 2020 — Price v Council
(Case T-231/20 R)
(Interim measures - Area of freedom, security and justice - Decision (EU) 2020/135 - Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom - Loss of EU citizenship - Application for suspension of operation - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Inadmissibility - Referral to the Court of Justice - Not competent)
(2020/C 313/41)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: David Price (Dorat, France) (represented by: J. Fouchet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer, R. Meyer and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking partial suspension of the operation of Council Decision (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 1), and of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 7), in so far as those acts do not permit the applicant to retain his EU citizenship, or, at the very least, partial suspension of the operation of Article 127(1)(b) of that agreement, and, second, application based on the second subparagraph of Article 256(3) TFEU seeking a stay of the proceedings and a referral to the Court of Justice in order to put questions to it for a preliminary ruling.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.