do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/657 of 15 May 2020 correcting certain language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2450 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the templates for the submission of information to the supervisory authorities according to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2020-05-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, exchange of information, financial control, financial solvency, insurance company, insurance law, reinsurance, supervisory body, technical standard








L_2020155EN.01000101.xml










18.5.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 155/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/657
of 15 May 2020
         
correcting certain language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2450 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the templates for the submission of information to the supervisory authorities according to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 35(10), the third subparagraph of Article 244(6) and the second subparagraph of Article 245(6) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Portuguese language version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2450 (2) contains several terminology errors throughout the Act and the Annexes.












(2)


The Swedish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2450 contains errors in Annex I, sections SR.22.03.01 and S.35.01.04, and in Annex II, section S.22.03, as regards the type of rate, and in Annex II, section S.26.03, as regards the expression of percentage point.












(3)


The Portuguese and Swedish language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2450 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(does not concern the English language)



Article 2

(does not concern the English language)



Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 15 May 2020.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2450 of 2 December 2015 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the templates for the submission of information to the supervisory authorities according to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 347, 31.12.2015, p. 1).
Draft Council Implementing Decision setting out a recommendation on addressing the deficiencies identified in the 2019 evaluation of the Czech Republic on the application of the Schengen acquis in the field of return - Decision to use the written procedure for the adoption
Date: 2020-05-15
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Czechia, Schengen Agreement, evaluation method, removal

1. 

Following the Council's adoption of Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 establishing an 

evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis, a 

team of experts from the Member States and the Commission carried out an evaluation of the 

Czech Republic on the application of the Schengen acquis in the field of return in 2019. 

2. 

In accordance with that Regulation, the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a 

Council Implementing Decision setting out a Recommendation designed to address the 

deficiencies identified in the course of the evaluation and ensure that the Czech Republic 

applies all Schengen rules related to return correctly and effectively. 

3. 

The Working Party for Schengen Matters (Evaluation), including the Mixed Committee 

partners Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and Liechtenstein, approved the proposal for the 

Council Implementing Decision setting out a Recommendation on 13 May 2020. 

8003/20  

JAI.B 

EN/mdc 

1 
EN 

  Council of the European Union        Brussels, 15 May 2020 (OR. en)   8003/20     SCH-EVAL 47 MIGR 37 COMIX 212   Interinstitutional File: 2020/0019(NLE)     'I' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Permanent Representatives Committee No. prev. doc.: 8002/20 Subject: Draft Council Implementing Decision setting out a recommendation on addressing the deficiencies identified in the 2019 evaluation of the Czech Republic on the application of the Schengen acquis in the field of return - Decision to use the written procedure for the adoption    
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. 

The Permanent Representatives Committee is therefore asked: 

- to recommend that the Council adopt the draft Council Implementing Decision, as set out in 

8002/20; 

- to decide, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 12(1) of the Council's Rules 

of Procedure and Article 1 of Council Decision 2020/430, that the Council uses the written 

procedure for its adoption. 

8003/20  

JAI.B 

EN/mdc 

2 
EN
Case T-91/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — WT v Commission
Date: 2020-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, disciplinary proceedings, harassment at work, indemnification, principle of legal certainty, psychological harassment








C_2020262EN.01002602.xml










10.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/26






Action brought on 15 May 2020 — WT v Commission
(Case T-91/20)
(2020/C 262/36)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: WT (represented by: G. Pandey and V. Villante, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of 7 November 2019 of the appointing authority (AIPN), notified to the applicant through ARES system on that date, which rejected the applicant’s complaint under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, lodged on 17 July 2019, including the rejection of her request for a EUR 30 000 compensation;










—


annul the decision of the AIPN of 17 April 2019, imposing the reprimand, under Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations;










—


order the defendant to pay the applicant EUR 30 000 compensation for the damaged incurred because of the abovementioned unlawful contested decisions;










—


order the requested measures of inquiry, as raised in the present application;










—


order the European Commission to bear its own and the applicant’s legal costs of the present judicial proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging breach of the duty of care and of the principle of good administration recognised in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging violation of the reasonable period of time recognised in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the principle of legal certainty and a violation of Article 12a of the Staff Regulations (prohibition of harassment) and manifest error of appreciation.
Case T-285/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — MCM Products v EUIPO — The Nomad Company (NOMAD)
Date: 2020-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020222EN.01003701.xml










6.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/37






Action brought on 15 May 2020 — MCM Products v EUIPO — The Nomad Company (NOMAD)
(Case T-285/20)
(2020/C 222/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: MCM Products AG (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Eichhammer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Nomad Company BV (Zevenaar, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘NOMAD’ — EU trade mark No 1 742 089

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2020 in Case R 854/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as it relates to the registered goods in Class 18;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-289/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Facegym v EUIPO (FACEGYM)
Date: 2020-05-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetics industry, education, hairdressing and beauty care, hand tool, medical device, provision of services, registered trade mark, therapeutics, trade-mark law








C_2020247EN.01002601.xml










27.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 247/26






Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Facegym v EUIPO (FACEGYM)
(Case T-289/20)
(2020/C 247/36)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Facegym Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark FACEGYM — Application for registration No. W1 466 456

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2020 in Case R 70/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;




alternatively






—


alter the contested decision so that it is now held that the allegedly offending goods and services of the International Trade Mark Registration do not offend against Article 7(1)(b) or (c);










—


order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this application and the costs below.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) or (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.