do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-276/20: Action brought on 11 May 2020 — Crevier v EUIPO (Air deodorizing apparatus)
Date: 2020-05-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, electrical equipment, household electrical appliance








C_2020247EN.01002301.xml










27.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 247/23






Action brought on 11 May 2020 — Crevier v EUIPO (Air deodorizing apparatus)
(Case T-276/20)
(2020/C 247/33)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Jeffrey Scott Crevier (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States) (represented by: M. Kime, Barrister)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Design: Application for registration No 5 652 872

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2020 in Case R 2396/2019-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the contested decision;










—


set aside the decision of the Examiner appealed against in respect of rejection of the application for restitutio in integrum as a whole;










—


grant of restitutio in integrum, alternatively, refer the matter back to EUIPO with appropriate directions to EUIPO;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of title VIII, ie Articles 62-78, of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of chapters VII–XIX, Articles 38-84 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002;










—


Infringement of the EU Treaty;










—


Infringement of a rule of law.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9840 – Macquarie/Fresco International) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 227/02
Date: 2020-05-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, energy grid, energy industry, energy production, energy transport, holding company, investment company, merger control








C_2020227EN.01000201.xml










10.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 227/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9840 – Macquarie/Fresco International)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 227/02)
On 11 May 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9840. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 8 May 2020 2020/C 160/01
Date: 2020-05-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020160EN.01000101.xml










11.5.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 160/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

8 May 2020
(2020/C 160/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0843 




JPY


Japanese yen


115,34 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4598 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87535 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5875 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0529 




ISK


Iceland króna


158,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,0695 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,251 




HUF


Hungarian forint


349,38 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5482 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8280 




TRY


Turkish lira


7,7252 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6613 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5118 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4052 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7668 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5326 




KRW


South Korean won


1 322,41 




ZAR


South African rand


19,9970 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6719 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5573 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 229,26 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6994 




PHP


Philippine peso


54,681 




RUB


Russian rouble


79,8383 




THB


Thai baht


34,958 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3074 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,9023 




INR


Indian rupee


81,9615 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-199/20 P: Appeal brought on 11 May 2020 by Gamma-A SIA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2020 in Case T-352/19, Gamma-A v EUIPO — Zivju pārstrādes uzņēmumu serviss
Date: 2020-05-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, foodstuff, packaging product








C_2020359EN.01000201.xml










26.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/2






Appeal brought on 11 May 2020 by Gamma-A SIA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2020 in Case T-352/19, Gamma-A v EUIPO — Zivju pārstrādes uzņēmumu serviss
(Case C-199/20 P)
(2020/C 359/02)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Gamma-A SIA (represented by: M. Liguts, advokāts)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 3 September 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Case T-274/20: Action brought on 11 May 2020 — MHCS v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (Shades of colour orange)
Date: 2020-05-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, champagne, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020247EN.01002101.xml










27.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 247/21






Action brought on 11 May 2020 — MHCS v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (Shades of colour orange)
(Case T-274/20)
(2020/C 247/31)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: MHCS (Épernay, France) (represented by: O. Vrins, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Colour consisting of certain shades of the colour orange) — European Union trade mark No 747 949

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2020 in Case R 2392/2018-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own costs;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 26(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark and/or of Rule 1(1)(d) in conjunction with Rule 3(2), (3) and (5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995, implementing Council Regulation (EC) No. 40/94 on the Community trade mark;










—


Infringement of the general principle of the protection of legitimate expectations and the principles of legal certainty and sound administration (including the duty to state reasons);










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Case C-200/20 P: Appeal brought on 11 May 2020 by Gamma-A SIA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2020 in Case T-353/19, Gamma-A v EUIPO — Zivju pārstrādes uzņēmumu serviss
Date: 2020-05-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, foodstuff, packaging product








C_2020359EN.01000202.xml










26.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/2






Appeal brought on 11 May 2020 by Gamma-A SIA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2020 in Case T-353/19, Gamma-A v EUIPO — Zivju pārstrādes uzņēmumu serviss
(Case C-200/20 P)
(2020/C 359/03)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Gamma-A SIA (represented by: M. Liguts, advokāts)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 3 September 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.