do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-239/20: Action brought on 30 April 2020 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO — Pfizer (RUXXIMLA)
Date: 2020-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, dissemination of information, medical device, pharmaceutical product, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2020209EN.01003701.xml










22.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 209/37






Action brought on 30 April 2020 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO — Pfizer (RUXXIMLA)
(Case T-239/20)
(2020/C 209/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Stada Arzneimittel AG (Bad Vilbel, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pfizer Inc. (New York, New York, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark RUXXIMLA — Application for registration No 17 865 742

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 February 2020 in Case R 1879/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs of the appeal proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/624 of 30 April 2020 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Cappero delle Isole Eolie (PDO))
Date: 2020-04-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Sicily, aromatic plant, designation of origin, labelling, preserved product, product designation, salted product








L_2020144EN.01001201.xml










7.5.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 144/12








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/624
of 30 April 2020
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Cappero delle Isole Eolie (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Cappero delle Isole Eolie’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


The Commission received a notice of opposition including a reasoned statement of opposition under Article 51(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 on behalf of the municipalities Malfa, Leni, and Santa Maria Salina, and held it to be inadmissible. In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 49(3) in conjunction with Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, natural or legal persons having a legitimate interest, established or resident in the Member State from which the application was lodged, are authorised to lodge a notice of opposition only through the national opposition procedure.












(3)


The name ‘Cappero delle Isole Eolie’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Cappero delle Isole Eolie’ PDO is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 30 April 2020.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 402, 28.11.2019, p. 26.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case T-591/18: Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — ZD v Parliament
Date: 2020-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, disciplinary proceedings, dismissal, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence, staff regulations (EU)








C_2020240EN.01003602.xml










20.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 240/36






Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — ZD v Parliament
(Case T-591/18) (1)

(2020/C 240/47)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Case T-623/19: Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — ArcelorMittal Bremen v Commission (Action for failure to act — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Decision 2011/278/EU — Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Amendment of Germany’s national allocation table for 2013-2020 — Significant increase in capacity — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2020-04-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bremen, EU Emissions Trading Scheme, Germany, metallurgical industry








C_2020209EN.01002801.xml










22.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 209/28






Order of the General Court of 30 April 2020 — ArcelorMittal Bremen v Commission
(Case T-623/19) (1)

(Action for failure to act - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - Decision 2011/278/EU - Transitional rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances - Amendment of Germany’s national allocation table for 2013-2020 - Significant increase in capacity - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 209/38)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and L. Buschmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Becker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 265 TFEU for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully refrained from taking a decision concerning the total annual quantity of emissions quotas that must be granted free of charge in response to a significant increase in capacity by a sub-installation of the applicant with a product benchmark for hot metal and, in the alternative, an application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision allegedly adopted by the Commission on 19 July 2019 concerning the giving of notice to the applicant on 1 July 2019.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each part shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Case C-211/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — UO v Készenléti Rendőrség (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Directive 2003/88/EC — Scope — Derogation — Article 1(3) — Directive 89/391/EEC — Article 2(2) — Activities of rapid intervention police officers)
Date: 2020-04-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrangement of working time, border control, migratory movement, occupational safety, police, rapid reaction force








C_2020240EN.01002201.xml










20.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 240/22






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — UO v Készenléti Rendőrség
(Case C-211/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 2003/88/EC - Scope - Derogation - Article 1(3) - Directive 89/391/EEC - Article 2(2) - Activities of rapid intervention police officers)
(2020/C 240/29)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Miskolci Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: UO

Defendant: Készenléti Rendőrség

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(3) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that Article 2(1) and (2) of that directive applies to members of law enforcement agencies carrying out surveillance functions at the external borders of a Member State in the event of an influx of third-country nationals to those borders, except where it appears, having regard to all relevant circumstances, that the tasks carried out are being performed in the context of exceptional events, the gravity and scale of which require the adoption of measures indispensable for the protection of the life, health and safety of the community at large, measures the proper implementation of which would be jeopardised if all the rules laid down in that directive were to be observed, this being a matter for the referring court to determine.


(1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9817 – Rhône Capital/Maxam) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 152/01
Date: 2020-04-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, explosive, firearms and munitions, investment company, merger control








C_2020152EN.01000101.xml










7.5.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9817 – Rhône Capital/Maxam)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 152/01)
On 30 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9817. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.