do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-210/20: Action brought on 20 April 2020 — Square v EUIPO ($ Cash App)
Date: 2020-04-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic money, payment system, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2020209EN.01003001.xml










22.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 209/30






Action brought on 20 April 2020 — Square v EUIPO ($ Cash App)
(Case T-210/20)
(2020/C 209/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Square, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Hawkins, Solicitor, K. Lüder, and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark $ Cash App — International registration designating the European Union No 1 410 819

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2020 in Case R 811/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Operations Department and the First Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and sound administration.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/548 of 6 April 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (Official Journal of the European Union L 91 of 9 April 2018)
Date: 2020-04-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, North Korea, common ports policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, ship's flag, trade restriction, vessel




L_2020121EN.01003301.xml










20.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 121/33







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/548 of 6 April 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 91 of 9 April 2018
)


On page 6, in the Annex:
for:











‘72.


SHANGHAI DONGFENG SHIPPING CO LTD









Room 601, 433, Chifeng Lu, Hongkou Qu, Shanghai, 200083, China


30.3.2018


Registered owner, ship and commercial manager of the DONG FENG 6, a vessel that loaded coal at Hamhung, DPRK on 11 July 2017 for export in violation of UN sanctions.




73.


SHEN ZHONG INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING


 


Unit 503, 5th Floor, Silvercord Tower 2, 30, Canton Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China


30.3.2018


Ship and commercial manager of HAO FAN 2 and HAO FAN 6, St Kitts-Nevis-flagged vessels. The HAO FAN 6 loaded coal at Nampo, DPRK on 27 August 2017. HAO FAN 2 loaded North Korean coal at Nampo, DPRK on 3 June 2017.’





read:











‘72.


SHANGHAI DONGFENG SHIPPING CO LTD


 


Room 601, 433, Chifeng Lu, Hongkou Qu, Shanghai, 200083, China


30.3.2018


Registered owner, ship and commercial manager of the DONG FENG 6, a vessel that loaded coal at Hamhung, DPRK on 11 July 2017 for export in violation of UN sanctions.




73.


SHEN ZHONG INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING









Unit 503, 5th Floor, Silvercord Tower 2, 30, Canton Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China


30.3.2018


Ship and commercial manager of HAO FAN 2 and HAO FAN 6, St Kitts-Nevis-flagged vessels. The HAO FAN 6 loaded coal at Nampo, DPRK on 27 August 2017. HAO FAN 2 loaded North Korean coal at Nampo, DPRK on 3 June 2017.’
Case T-849/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 20 April 2020 — Leonardo v Frontex (Interim measures — Public service contracts — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2020-04-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, drone, invitation to tender, maritime surveillance, services contract, tendering








C_2020201EN.01002401.xml










15.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/24






Order of the President of the General Court of 20 April 2020 — Leonardo v Frontex
(Case T-849/19 R)
(Interim measures - Public service contracts - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)
(2020/C 201/34)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Leonardo SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Parrella, lawyer)

Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: S. Drew, H. Caniard, C. Georgiadis and A. Gras, acting as Agents, and by M. Vanderstraeten, F. Biebuyck and V. Ost, lawyers)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures as regards a stay of execution of the call for tender published on 18 October 2019 by Frontex, entitled ‘Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) for Medium Altitude Long Endurance Maritime Aerial Surveillance’.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case C-164/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 20 April 2020 — Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG
Date: 2020-04-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, illness, indemnification, traveller








C_2020230EN.01001701.xml










13.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/17






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 20 April 2020 — Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AG
(Case C-164/20)
(2020/C 230/22)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Korneuburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Airhelp Limited

Respondent: Austrian Airlines AG

Question referred

Are Articles 5, 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the illness and associated unfitness to fly, as diagnosed by an airport doctor, of a passenger who has already boarded an aircraft which has not yet taken off — after which the air carrier refuses to carry that passenger, with the result that the passenger must leave the aircraft and his baggage must be unloaded — must be regarded as an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 17 April 2020 2020/C 127/03
Date: 2020-04-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020127EN.01000401.xml










20.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 127/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

17 April 2020
(2020/C 127/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0860 




JPY


Japanese yen


116,86 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4603 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86978 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,8548 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0515 




ISK


Iceland króna


156,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,2845 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,163 




HUF


Hungarian forint


351,81 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5185 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8356 




TRY


Turkish lira


7,4981 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7088 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5280 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4171 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8043 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5447 




KRW


South Korean won


1 321,53 




ZAR


South African rand


20,3626 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6821 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5715 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 925,99 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7458 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,295 




RUB


Russian rouble


80,3650 




THB


Thai baht


35,328 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6798 




MXN


Mexican peso


26,0926 




INR


Indian rupee


83,0565 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-211/20: Action brought on 20 April 2020 — Square v EUIPO ($ Cash App)
Date: 2020-04-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic money, payment system, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2020209EN.01003101.xml










22.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 209/31






Action brought on 20 April 2020 — Square v EUIPO ($ Cash App)
(Case T-211/20)
(2020/C 209/42)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Square, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Hawkins, Solicitor, K. Lüder and T. Dolde, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark $ Cash App — International registration designating the European Union No 1 410 839

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2020 in Case R 810/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Operations Department and the First Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 72(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.