do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/469 of 14 February 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 and Regulation (EU) 2017/373 as regards requirements for air traffic management/air navigation services, design of airspace structures and data quality, runway safety and repealing Regulation No 73/2010 (Official Journal of the European Union L 104 of 3 April 2020)
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: air safety, air space, air traffic, air traffic control, civil aviation, exchange of information, market access, provision of services, transport market








L_2020106EN.01001401.xml










6.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/14







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/469 of 14 February 2020 amending Regulation (EU) No 923/2012, Regulation (EU) No 139/2014 and Regulation (EU) 2017/373 as regards requirements for air traffic management/air navigation services, design of airspace structures and data quality, runway safety and repealing Regulation No 73/2010

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 104 of 3 April 2020
)


On page 112, point (4)(a)(ii) of Annex III, in the amendments to point ATS.OR.405 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/373:
for:

                  ‘
                  ATS.OR.405 Use and availability of the VHF emergency channel







(a)


As laid down in Article 3d, the VHF emergency channel (121,500 MHz) shall be used for genuine emergency purposes, including any of the following:’,




read:

                  ‘
                  ATS.OR.405 Use and availability of the VHF emergency frequency







(a)


As laid down in Article 3d, the VHF emergency frequency (121,500 MHz) shall be used for genuine emergency purposes, including any of the following:’.
Case T-189/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Chiquita Brands v EUIPO — Fyffes International (HOYA)
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, fresh fruit, fresh vegetable, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, tropical fruit








C_2020191EN.01003502.xml










8.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/35






Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Chiquita Brands v EUIPO — Fyffes International (HOYA)
(Case T-189/20)
(2020/C 191/48)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Chiquita Brands LLC (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States) (represented by: W. Pors, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fyffes International Unlimited Company (Dublin, Ireland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark HOYA in colours yellow, blue and black — European Union trade mark No 10 612 166

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 January 2020 in Case R 962/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


grant the applicant’s application for revocation in full;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the full costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of the prohibition of reformatio in peius and Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-178/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed)
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, marketing, medical plant, medical research, narcotic, packaging, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law








C_2020191EN.01003002.xml










8.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/30






Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Bavaria Weed v EUIPO (BavariaWeed)
(Case T-178/20)
(2020/C 191/41)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Bavaria Weed GmbH (Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany) (represented by: J. Wolhändler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark — Application for registration No 17 997 323

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 January 2020 in Case R 1458/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Breach of the principles of equal treatment and good administration.
Corrigendum to definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/227 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2020 (Official Journal of the European Union L 57 of 27 February 2020)
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: adoption of the budget, financial year, general budget (EU)








L_2020106EN.01001201.xml










6.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 106/12







Corrigendum to definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2020/227 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2020

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 57 of 27 February 2020
)


On page 18, A. Introduction and financing of the general budget, Table 4:
Table 4 should read as follows:

‘TABLE 4
Calculation of the gross reduction in GNI contribution for Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden and its financing, pursuant to Article 2(5) of Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom (Chapter 1 6)









Member State


Gross reduction


Percentage share of GNI base


GNI key applied to the gross reduction


Financing of the reduction




 


(1)


(2)


(3)


(4) = (1) + (3)




Belgium


 


2,84


32 315 590 


32 315 590 




Bulgaria


 


0,36


4 143 098 


4 143 098 




Czechia


 


1,27


14 439 375 


14 439 375 




Denmark


– 146 333 564 


1,91


21 737 317 


– 124 596 247 




Germany


 


21,65


246 111 806 


246 111 806 




Estonia


 


0,17


1 878 136 


1 878 136 




Ireland


 


1,64


18 636 293 


18 636 293 




Greece


 


1,16


13 208 785 


13 208 785 




Spain


 


7,64


86 854 423 


86 854 423 




France


 


14,94


169 899 670 


169 899 670 




Croatia


 


0,32


3 689 222 


3 689 222 




Italy


 


10,80


122 742 708 


122 742 708 




Cyprus


 


0,13


1 469 414 


1 469 414 




Latvia


 


0,19


2 200 219 


2 200 219 




Lithuania


 


0,28


3 236 611 


3 236 611 




Luxembourg


 


0,26


2 963 014 


2 963 014 




Hungary


 


0,85


9 622 538 


9 622 538 




Malta


 


0,08


888 410 


888 410 




Netherlands


– 782 321 749 


4,89


55 561 753 


– 726 759 996 




Austria


 


2,43


27 650 415 


27 650 415 




Poland


 


3,15


35 857 741 


35 857 741 




Portugal


 


1,24


14 093 655 


14 093 655 




Romania


 


1,33


15 165 924 


15 165 924 




Slovenia


 


0,30


3 397 489 


3 397 489 




Slovakia


 


0,59


6 689 472 


6 689 472 




Finland


 


1,46


16 644 634 


16 644 634 




Sweden


– 208 243 919 


2,88


32 713 177 


– 175 530 742 




United Kingdom


 


15,22


173 088 343 


173 088 343 





Total




–1 136 899 232 




100,00




1 136 899 232 




0





EU GDP price deflator, in EUR (spring 2019 economic forecast) : (a) 2011 EU-27 = 100,0000 / (b) 2013 EU-27 = 102,9958 (c) 2013 EU-28 = 102,9874 / (d) 2020 EU-28 = 112,5551




Lump sum for Netherlands: in 2020 prices: 695 000 000  EUR × [ (b/a) × (d/c) ] = 782 321 749  EUR




Lump sum for Sweden: in 2020 prices: 185 000 000  EUR × [ (b/a) × (d/c) ] = 208 243 919  EUR




Lump sum for Denmark: in 2020 prices: 130 000 000  EUR × [ (b/a) × (d/c) ] = 146 333 564  EUR’
Case T-201/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU)
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020191EN.01003801.xml










8.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/38






Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Berebene v EUIPO — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (GHISU)
(Case T-201/20)
(2020/C 191/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Berebene Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Massimiani, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (Radda in Chianti, Italy)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark in colour GHISU — Application for registration No 17 232 571

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 January 2020 in Case R 592/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


and, as a result, order the registration of EU figurative mark GHISU No 17 232 571 also for the goods in Class 33 of the Nice Agreement;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the opposition and appeal proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Incorrect comparison of the marks at issue and incorrect global assessment of the likelihood of confusion and unfair advantage.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 113/05
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: chemical compound, chemical product, health control, health risk, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating








C_2020113EN.01000501.xml










6.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/5






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)


(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
 (1)

)


(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 113/05)

Decisions granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2020)1841


30 March 2020


Pentazinc chromate octahydroxide
EC No 256-418-0, CAS No 49663-84-5


Aviall Services Inc., Schillingweg 40, 2153PL, Nieuw-Vennep, Noord-Holland, Netherlands


REACH/20/11/0


Formulation of mixtures exclusively for uses bearing authorisation numbers REACH/20/11/2 and REACH/20/11/3


22 January 2026


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.




Finalin GmbH, Georg-Wilhelm-Strasse 189, 21107 Hamburg, Germany


REACH/20/11/1




Aviall Services Inc., Schillingweg 40, 2153PL, Nieuw-Vennep, Noord-Holland, Netherlands


REACH/20/11/2


Use in wash primers, fuel tank primer and aluminized primer for the purpose of corrosion protection in aeronautic applications where any of the following key functionalities or properties is necessary for the intended use: corrosion resistance, active corrosion inhibition, adhesion, chemical resistance, layer thickness, temperature resistance, compatibility with other substrate/other coatings, dynamic performance (only for fuel tank primer) and appearance (only for aluminized primer)




Finalin GmbH, Georg-Wilhelm-Strasse 189, 21107 Hamburg, Germany


REACH/20/11/3






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 3 April 2020 2020/C 113/04
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020113EN.01000401.xml










6.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

3 April 2020
(2020/C 113/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0785 




JPY


Japanese yen


117,10 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4689 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87850 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,9520 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0547 




ISK


Iceland króna


155,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,2628 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


27,539 




HUF


Hungarian forint


365,15 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5765 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8307 




TRY


Turkish lira


7,2296 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,8004 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5299 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,3625 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8423 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5489 




KRW


South Korean won


1 332,82 




ZAR


South African rand


20,2642 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6476 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6300 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 918,68 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7006 




PHP


Philippine peso


54,805 




RUB


Russian rouble


82,8075 




THB


Thai baht


35,601 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,6893 




MXN


Mexican peso


26,5470 




INR


Indian rupee


82,2160 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Czech Republic of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions 2020/C 116/04
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, EU environmental policy, action programme, air quality, industrial pollution, prevention of pollution, waste incineration








C_2020116EN.01000601.xml










8.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 116/6






Adoption of Commission Decision on the notification by the Czech Republic of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions
(2020/C 116/04)
On 6 April 2020, the Commission adopted Commission Decision C(2020) 2009 on the notification by the Czech Republic of a modified transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) on industrial emissions.
This document is available on the following internet site: https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/welcome


(1)  OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17.
Case T-195/20: Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Sociedade de Água de Monchique v EUIPO -Ventura Vendrell (chic ÁGUA ALCALINA 9,5 PH)
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, mineral water, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020201EN.01003901.xml










15.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/39






Action brought on 6 April 2020 — Sociedade de Água de Monchique v EUIPO -Ventura Vendrell (chic ÁGUA ALCALINA 9,5 PH)
(Case T-195/20)
(2020/C 201/52)
Language in which the application was lodged: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Sociedade de Água de Monchique, SA (Caldas de Monchique, Portugal) (represented by: M. Osório de Castro, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pere Ventura Vendrell (Sant Sadurni d’Anoia, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant in the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark chic ÁGUA ALCALINA 9,5 PH — Application for registration No 017 027 608

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 January 2020 in Case R 2524/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision so that the registration of the requested mark is granted;










—


order EUIPO to pay all the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9439 — Warner Bros/Universal/Home Entertainment/JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 274/03
Date: 2020-04-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consumer goods, economic concentration, electronic game, intellectual property, merger control, programmes industry, provision of services, technology, telecommunications, television








C_2020274EN.01000301.xml










19.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9439 — Warner Bros/Universal/Home Entertainment/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 274/03)
On 6 April 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9439. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.