do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9749 — Glencore Energy UK/Ørsted LNG Business) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 99/04
Date: 2020-03-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, gas pipeline, merger control, natural gas, natural resources, primary product, storage of hydrocarbons








C_2020099EN.01000401.xml










26.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9749 — Glencore Energy UK/Ørsted LNG Business)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 99/04)
On 19 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9749. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-156/20: Action brought on 19 March 2020 — JA v Parliament
Date: 2020-03-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, equal treatment, formation of a party, indemnification, political group (EP), right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2020201EN.01002902.xml










15.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/29






Action brought on 19 March 2020 — JA v Parliament
(Case T-156/20)
(2020/C 201/41)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: JA (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:
Principally:






—


annul the decision of 4 July 2019 dismissing the applicant;










—


order the European Parliament to pay compensation in the sum of EUR 20 000 in respect of the non-material harm suffered;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs;




In the alternative:






—


find that the decision dissolving the political group ENF was unlawful;










—


accordingly, annul the decision of 4 July 2019 dismissing the applicant;










—


order the European Parliament to pay compensation in the sum of EUR 20 000 in respect of the non-material harm suffered;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies, principally, on five pleas in law that are identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-154/20, IY v Parliament.
In the alternative, the applicant pleads the unlawfulness of the decision dissolving the European political group ENF. The applicant argues that since the dissolution decision was unlawful, as it was vitiated by a manifest error of assessment and a misuse of powers, the dismissal decision — which was based exclusively on that dissolution — is itself, therefore, unlawful and must be annulled.