do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-814/19: Order of the President of the Court of 13 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court) — United Kingdom) — AC, TM, GM, MM v ABC Sl, XYZ Plc
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: artificial reproduction, insurance claim, insurance company, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, private international law, right of action








C_2020320EN.01002203.xml










28.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/22






Order of the President of the Court of 13 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court) — United Kingdom) — AC, TM, GM, MM v ABC Sl, XYZ Plc
(Case C-814/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/48)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.
Case T-278/19: Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Aurora v CPVO — SESVanderhave (M 02205) (Action for annulment — Plant varieties — Nullity proceedings — Sugar beet variety M 02205 — Decision to remit the case to the competent body of the CPVO for further action — Article 72 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — No interest in bringing proceedings — Power to alter decisions — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: plant breeding, plant variety right, principle of legal certainty, right to justice, sugar beet








C_2020222EN.01002401.xml










6.7.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 222/24






Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Aurora v CPVO — SESVanderhave (M 02205)
(Case T-278/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Plant varieties - Nullity proceedings - Sugar beet variety M 02205 - Decision to remit the case to the competent body of the CPVO for further action - Article 72 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 - No interest in bringing proceedings - Power to alter decisions - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2020/C 222/26)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Aurora Srl (Padua, Italy) (represented by: L.B. Buchman, lawyer)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (represented by: M. Ekvad, F. Mattina, M. Garcia Monco-Fuente and A. Weitz, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO, intervener before the General Court: SESVanderhave NV (Tienen, Belgium) (represented by: P. de Jong, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 27 February 2019 (Case A 10/2013 RENV), concerning nullity proceedings between Aurora and SESVanderhave.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Aurora Srl, the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) and SESVanderhave NV shall bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Case T-20/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Intertranslations (Intertransleïsions) Metafraseis v Parliament (Interim measures — Public service contracts — Application for interim measures — No urgency)
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, damages, financial management, public procurement, right to justice, services contract, tendering, translation








C_2020175EN.01002802.xml










25.5.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/28






Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Intertranslations (Intertransleïsions) Metafraseis v Parliament
(Case T-20/20 R)
(Interim measures - Public service contracts - Application for interim measures - No urgency)
(2020/C 175/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Intertranslations (Intertransleïsions) Metafraseis AE (Kallithea, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Toliušis and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures, in the first place, suspending the operation of the decisions of the Parliament of 4 December 2019 which rank the applicant’s tender in the second place for the award of the cascade contract relating to Lot No 5 of the contract for translation services into English in Call for tenders TRA/EU19/2019 and award the first contract arising from that call for tenders to another tenderer, in the second place, suspending the contract concluded with that other tenderer and, in the third place, ordering the Parliament to communicate to the applicant the missing sections of the Evaluation Committee’s statement of reasons.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


Costs are reserved.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9434 — UTC/Raytheon) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 379/02
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aeronautical industry, arms industry, building industry, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, technology








C_2020379EN.01000801.xml










10.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 379/8






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9434 — UTC/Raytheon)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 379/02)
On 13 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9434. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-183/19: Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Jalkh v Parliament (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Amendments to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure — Major interpellations — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Locus standi — Lack of direct concern — Lack of individual concern — Regulatory act — Implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, admissibility, cultural pluralism, linguistic discrimination, mother tongue, parliamentary rules of procedure, right of action, rules of procedure, use of languages








C_2020175EN.01002501.xml










25.5.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/25






Order of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Jalkh v Parliament
(Case T-183/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Amendments to the European Parliament’s Rules of Procedure - Major interpellations - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Locus standi - Lack of direct concern - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory act - Implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 175/33)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Jean-François Jalkh (Gretz-Armainvilliers, France) (represented by F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by S. Alonso de León and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought under Article 263 TFUE seeking annulment of Parliament Decision P8_TA(2019)0046 of 31 January 2019 on amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure affecting Chapters 1 and 4 of Title I; Chapter 3 of Title V; Chapters 4 and 5 of Title VII; Chapter 1 of Title VIII; Title XII; Title XIV and Annex II (2018/2170(REG)).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Jean-François Jalkh shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 12 March 2020 2020/C 83/04
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020083EN.01000401.xml










13.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 83/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

12 March 2020
(2020/C 83/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1240 




JPY


Japanese yen


116,84 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4727 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88623 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,8945 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0549 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,64 




NOK


Norwegian krone


11,3682 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,203 




HUF


Hungarian forint


338,37 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3599 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8213 




TRY


Turkish lira


7,0361 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7674 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5524 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7466 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8173 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5779 




KRW


South Korean won


1 359,40 




ZAR


South African rand


18,4447 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8877 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6000 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 434,00 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7944 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,645 




RUB


Russian rouble


84,0284 




THB


Thai baht


35,586 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,5081 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,8028 




INR


Indian rupee


83,4680 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 April 2020 (Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1)) 2020/C 83/05
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, State aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_2020083EN.01000501.xml










13.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 83/5






Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates applicable as from 1 April 2020


(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))


(2020/C 83/05)
Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6.). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.
Modified rates are indicated in bold.
Previous table published in OJ C 64, 27.2.2020, p. 16.


































From


To


AT


BE


BG


CY


CZ


DE


DK


EE


EL


ES


FI


FR


HR


HU


IE


IT


LT


LU


LV


MT


NL


PL


PT


RO


SE


SI


SK


UK




1.4.2020


…


-0,31 


-0,31 


0,00


-0,31 


2,25


-0,31 


-0,05 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


0,26



0,40



-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


1,84


-0,31 


3,21


0,26


-0,31 


-0,31 


0,94




1.3.2020


31.3.2020


-0,31 


-0,31 


0,00


-0,31 


2,25


-0,31 



-0,05 



-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


0,26


0,30


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


1,84


-0,31 


3,21



0,26



-0,31 


-0,31 


0,94




1.2.2020


29.2.2020


-0,31 


-0,31 


0,00


-0,31 


2,25


-0,31 



-0,07 



-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


0,26


0,30


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


-0,31 


1,84


-0,31 


3,21



0,18



-0,31 


-0,31 


0,94




1.1.2020


31.1.2020



-0,31 




-0,31 




0,00




-0,31 




2,25




-0,31 




-0,12 




-0,31 




-0,31 




-0,31 




-0,31 




-0,31 




0,26




0,30




-0,31 




-0,31 




-0,31 




-0,31 




-0,31 




-0,31 




-0,31 




1,84




-0,31 




3,21




0,11




-0,31 




-0,31 




0,94
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9745 — Sunsuper/Macquarie/PGGM/MAGL) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 200/04
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: aircraft, banking, consultancy, economic concentration, financial services, merger control, pension fund, rental business








C_2020200EN.01000801.xml










15.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/8






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9745 — Sunsuper/Macquarie/PGGM/MAGL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 200/04)
On 13 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9745. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9758 — Toyota Financial Services Corporation/Mitsui & Co/KINTO Brasil) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 98/07
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: combined transport, economic concentration, financial services, hire purchase, logistics, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle rental








C_2020098EN.01000701.xml










25.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/7






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9758 — Toyota Financial Services Corporation/Mitsui & Co/KINTO Brasil)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 98/07)
On 13 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9758. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-597/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Finland, bus, carriage of passengers, carrier, control of State aid, credit, market prices, principle of proportionality, reimbursement of aid, rights of the defence








C_2020191EN.01001702.xml










8.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/17






Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin kaupunki v Commission
(Case T-597/19 R)
(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(2020/C 191/23)
Language of the case: Finnish

Parties


Applicant: Helsingin kaupunki (Finland) (represented by: I. Aalto-Setälä, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Huttunen and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 3152 final of 28 June 2019 relating to State aid SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by Finland for Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The order of 19 September 2019, Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (T-597/19 R, not published) is set aside.











3.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Nobina Oy and of Nobina AB or the application for confidentiality made by Helsingin kaupunki.










4.


The costs are reserved, except for those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB, which shall bear their own costs relating to their application for leave to intervene in the proceedings for interim measures.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9717 — Bergé/Mitsubishi Corporation/Bergé Auto/JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 91/01
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: distributor, economic concentration, harbour installation, logistics, merger control, motor vehicle, provision of services, renewable energy, retail trade, wholesale trade








C_2020091EN.01000101.xml










20.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 91/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9717 — Bergé/Mitsubishi Corporation/Bergé Auto/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 91/01)
On 13 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9717. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-603/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Finland, State aid, bus, carriage of passengers, carrier, control of State aid, principle of proportionality, reimbursement of aid








C_2020175EN.01002701.xml










25.5.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/27






Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission
(Case T-603/19 R)
(Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(2020/C 175/36)
Language of the case: Finnish

Parties


Applicant: Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by O. Hyvönen and N. Rosenlund, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by M. Huttunen and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: the Republic of Finland (represented by J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFUE seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 3152 final of 28 June 2019 on the State aid SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by the Republic of Finland for the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is rejected;










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application to intervene by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB and on the request for confidential treatment by the European Commission;










3.


The costs are reserved, with the exception of those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB, which shall bear their own costs relating to their application to intervene in the proceedings for interim measures.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9750 — HIG Capital/Lagardère Sports and Entertainment SAS/Lagardère Sports Inc.) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 418/04
Date: 2020-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: advertising, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, programmes industry, sponsorship, sport








C_2020418EN.01000401.xml










3.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 418/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9750 — HIG Capital/Lagardère Sports and Entertainment SAS/Lagardère Sports Inc.)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 418/04)
On 13 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9750. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.