do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-766/19: Order of the Court of 10 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — QE, RD v SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Scope — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Generalised malfunction in an airport’s refuelling system)
Date: 2020-03-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, traveller








C_2020287EN.01002402.xml










31.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/24






Order of the Court of 10 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores — Portugal) — QE, RD v SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA
(Case C-766/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Manifest inadmissibility - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 5(3) - Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights - Scope - Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation - Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ - Generalised malfunction in an airport’s refuelling system)
(2020/C 287/36)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: QE, RD

Defendant: SATA Internacional — Serviços de Transportes Aéreos SA

Other party: ANA — Aeroportos de Portugal SA

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (District Court, Azores, Portugal), by decision of 8 July 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
Case T-251/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2020 — IFSUA v Council (Fisheries — Conservation of marine biological resources — Regulation (EU) 2018/120 — Measures concerning the fishing for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) — Action for annulment brought by an association — Article 263 TFEU — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Direct concern of the members of the association — Admissibility — Competence of the European Union to regulate recreational fisheries — Legal certainty — Protection of legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Principle of non-discrimination — Proportionality — Precautionary principle — Freedom of association and freedom to conduct a business)
Date: 2020-03-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU waters, catch by species, conservation of fish stocks, equal treatment, fishing rights, international waters, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, recreational fishing, sea fish








C_2020137EN.01004601.xml










27.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 137/46






Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2020 — IFSUA v Council
(Case T-251/18) (1)

(Fisheries - Conservation of marine biological resources - Regulation (EU) 2018/120 - Measures concerning the fishing for European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) - Action for annulment brought by an association - Article 263 TFEU - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern of the members of the association - Admissibility - Competence of the European Union to regulate recreational fisheries - Legal certainty - Protection of legitimate expectations - Equal treatment - Principle of non-discrimination - Proportionality - Precautionary principle - Freedom of association and freedom to conduct a business)
(2020/C 137/72)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: T. Gui Mori and R. Agut Jubert, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and P. Plaza García, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Morales Puerta, F. Moro and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Council Regulation (EU) 2018/120 of 23 January 2018 fixing for 2018 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/127 (OJ 2018 L 27, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interim proceedings;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 221, 25.6.2018.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 9 March 2020 2020/C 78/02
Date: 2020-03-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020078EN.01000201.xml










10.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

9 March 2020
(2020/C 78/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1456 




JPY


Japanese yen


117,12 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4695 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87383 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7203 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0594 




ISK


Iceland króna


145,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,8900 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,504 




HUF


Hungarian forint


336,25 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3132 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8175 




TRY


Turkish lira


7,0002 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,7330 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5613 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9041 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8021 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5841 




KRW


South Korean won


1 374,71 




ZAR


South African rand


18,2898 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9600 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5500 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 488,05 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8304 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,013 




RUB


Russian rouble


85,1553 




THB


Thai baht


36,081 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,4418 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,3268 




INR


Indian rupee


84,9600 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9715 — PCG/PCC/JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 96/01
Date: 2020-03-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, energy industry, holding company, logistics, merger control, parent company, petrochemicals








C_2020096EN.01000101.xml










24.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9715 — PCG/PCC/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 96/01)
On 10 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9715. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.