do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9700 – Dnata/Alpha LSG) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 214/01
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: air transport, catering industry, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services








C_2020214EN.01000101.xml










29.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 214/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9700 – Dnata/Alpha LSG)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 214/01)
On 6 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9700. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9674 – Vodafone Italia/TIM/INWIT JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 309/03
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, mobile communication, transmission network








C_2020309EN.01000301.xml










18.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 309/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9674 – Vodafone Italia/TIM/INWIT JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 309/03)
On 6 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9674. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 5 March 2020 2020/C 73/03
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020073EN.01000401.xml










6.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

5 March 2020
(2020/C 73/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1187 




JPY


Japanese yen


119,63 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4712 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86670 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5915 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0663 




ISK


Iceland króna


142,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3710 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,346 




HUF


Hungarian forint


335,70 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3029 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8110 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,8038 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6917 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5021 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6936 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7744 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5495 




KRW


South Korean won


1 327,01 




ZAR


South African rand


17,2746 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7579 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4905 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 851,98 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6532 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,785 




RUB


Russian rouble


74,3070 




THB


Thai baht


35,295 




BRL


Brazilian real


5,1480 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,0737 




INR


Indian rupee


82,1530 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Communication on the publication of the amounts of raw milk production as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.) 2020/C 73/01
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: dairy production, raw milk, regulation of agricultural production




C_2020073EN.01000101.xml










6.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/1






Communication on the publication of the amounts of raw milk production as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

(2020/C 73/01)









Annual data (1000 t)




Amounts of raw milk production (*2) as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013




2018


Cow


Ewe


Goat


Buffalo




BE


4 178,00 


0,00


41,00


0,00




BG


898,77


71,54


43,14


11,75




CZ


3 161,51 


0,02 (*3)



0,05 (*3)



0,00




DK


5 615,20 


0,00


0,00


0,00




DE


33 086,81 


6,65


16,19


0,00




EE


796,90


0,00


0,70


0,00




IE


7 831,25 


0,00


0,00


0,00




EL


654,80


851,70


338,40


0,00




ES


7 335,62 


566,36


515,55


0,00




FR


25 054,77 


317,59


639,90


0,00




HR


618,00


7,00


9,00


0,00




IT


12 339,75 


485,11


61,99


244,79




CY


228,08


34,15


32,42


0,00




LV


980,20


0,00


2,70


0,00




LT


1 568,01 


0,00


3,83


0,00




LU


407,62


0,05


3,22


0,00




HU


1 948,83 


1,65


3,28


0,00




MT


40,41


1,89


0,93


0,00




NL


14 090,00 


0,00


335,00


1,20




AT


3 821,19 


12,69


26,11


0,00




PL


14 171,15 


0,61


7,45


0,00




PT


1 939,67 


72,57


28,05


0,00




RO


3 797,60 


401,30


228,20


16,20




SI


628,93


0,62


1,68


0,00




SK


904,62


12,07


0,31


0,00




FI


2 397,88 


0,00


0,00


0,00




SE


2 760,23 


0,00


0,00


0,00




UK


15 488,11 


0,00


0,00


0,00




EU-28


166 743,91 


2 843,57 


2 339,10 


273,94






(1)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(*1)  0,00: zero or less than 5 t

(*2)  2018 Milk Production on the farm EUROSTAT – NewCronos Products Obtained

(*3)  Communicated by Member State and/or estimated/calculated production
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9733 — ENGIE/Mirova/Predica/JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 82/02
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electricity supply, gas supply, health insurance, hydraulic energy, insurance company, investment company, life assurance, merger control, power plant








C_2020082EN.01000201.xml










12.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 82/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9733 — ENGIE/Mirova/Predica/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 82/02)
On 6 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9733. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9649 — TSR Recycling/Sims Metal Management (Certain Recycling Assets)) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 86/02
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic waste, merger control, metal waste, waste recycling








C_2020086EN.01000201.xml










16.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 86/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9649 — TSR Recycling/Sims Metal Management (Certain Recycling Assets))
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 86/02)
On 6 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9649. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9740 — ISQ/Rubis/Rubis Terminal) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 83/03
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, fuel, investment company, merger control, storage, storage of hydrocarbons, wholesale selling








C_2020083EN.01000301.xml










13.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 83/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9740 — ISQ/Rubis/Rubis Terminal)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 83/03)
On 6 March 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9740. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9734 — HPS/MDP/Arachas) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 73/06
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, merger control








C_2020073EN.01001001.xml










6.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/10






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9734 — HPS/MDP/Arachas)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 73/06)

1.   
On 27 February 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


HPS Investment Partners, LLC (‘HPS’, USA),










—


Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC (‘MDP’, USA),










—


Arachas Topco Limited (‘Arachas’, Ireland).




HPS and MDP acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Arachas.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


HPS is a US-based investment firm.










—


MDP is a US-based private equity investment firm.










—


Arachas is an insurance broker operating in the commercial and personal non-life sector in Ireland.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9734 – HPS/MDP/Arachas
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case C-816/19: Order of the President of the Court of 6 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — QF v Germanwings GmbH
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carrier, indemnification, strike, trade union, traveller








C_2020320EN.01002204.xml










28.9.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/22






Order of the President of the Court of 6 March 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — QF v Germanwings GmbH
(Case C-816/19) (1)

(2020/C 320/49)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/395 of 6 March 2020 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed ‘Amatriciana Tradizionale’ (TSG)
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Latium, designation of origin, labelling, prepared foodstuff, product designation








L_2020077EN.01000101.xml










13.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 77/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/395
of 6 March 2020
         
entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed ‘Amatriciana Tradizionale’ (TSG)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Amatriciana Tradizionale’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Amatriciana Tradizionale’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Amatriciana Tradizionale’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.21. – prepared meals, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 March 2020.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 393, 20.11.2019, p. 12.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Corrigendum to Decision No 1/2018 of the ECAA Joint Committee of 3 May 2018 with regard to the adoption of its rules of procedure 2019/1802 (Official Journal of the European Union L 274 of 28 October 2019)
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: European Union, Joint Committee
Subjects: European cooperation, air space, air transport, joint committee (EU), multilateral agreement, rules of procedure








L_2020069EN.01005801.xml










6.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 69/58







Corrigendum to Decision No 1/2018 of the ECAA Joint Committee of 3 May 2018 with regard to the adoption of its rules of procedure 2019/1802

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 274 of 28 October 2019
)


On page 15:
for:


                  ‘(*) This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.’,

read:


                  ‘(*) Pursuant to UN Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.’
Summary of Commission Decision of 6 March 2020 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Case AT.40335 – Romanian gas interconnectors) (notified under document C(2020) 1232) (Only the English text is authentic) 2021/C 16/04
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: EU competition policy, Romania, control of restrictive practices, dominant position, energy transport, export, gas pipeline, natural gas, restrictive trade practice, sanction (EU)








C_2021016EN.01000401.xml










15.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/4






Summary of Commission Decision
of 6 March 2020
relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
(Case AT.40335 – Romanian gas interconnectors)


(notified under document C(2020) 1232)


(Only the English text is authentic)
(2021/C 16/04)

On 6 March 2020, the Commission adopted a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1), the Commission herewith publishes the names of the parties and the main content of the decision, including any penalties imposed, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business secrets.


(1)   

The case concerns Societatea Națională de Transport Gaze Naturale Transgaz S.A. (‘Transgaz’), the sole manager and operator of the natural gas transmission network in Romania.



(2)   

The concern of the Commission was that Transgaz may have abused its dominant position on the market for natural gas transmission in Romania by creating or maintaining barriers to the cross-border flow of natural gas from Romania to other Member States, in particular Hungary and Bulgaria. Such conduct could lead to the partitioning of the internal market along national borders and discrimination between customers in Romania and customers in other Member States.



(3)   

The Commission considers that the commitments offered by Transgaz following the preliminary assessment and the observations submitted by interested third parties are sufficient to address the identified competition concerns. Firstly, the commitments provide that Transgaz will make available increased capacities for natural gas exports towards Hungary and Bulgaria. Secondly, the commitments provide that Transgaz will ensure that the tariff proposals it submits to the Romanian energy regulator will not discriminate against exports. Finally, the commitments provide that Transgaz will not prevent, hinder, or discriminate against, directly or indirectly, gas exports through any other means.



(4)   

The decision finds that, in light of the commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission. The decision will be binding until 31 December 2026.



(5)   

The Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions issued a favourable opinion on 19 February 2020.




(1)  OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.
Case T-814/19: Order of the General Court of 6 March 2020 — Nutravita v EUIPO — Pegaso (nutravita Healthy Mind, Body & Soul.) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2020-03-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vitamin








C_2020191EN.01001801.xml










8.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 191/18






Order of the General Court of 6 March 2020 — Nutravita v EUIPO — Pegaso (nutravita Healthy Mind, Body & Soul.)
(Case T-814/19) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 191/24)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Nutravita Ltd (Maidenhead, United Kingdom) (represented by: H. Dhondt and J. Cassiman, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pegaso Srl (Negrar, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 September 2019 (Case R 80/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Pegaso Srl and Nutravita Ltd

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Nutravita Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.