do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-248/19: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Bilde v Parliament (Privileges and immunities — Member of the European Parliament — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity — Manifest error of assessment — Electa una via — Principle of ne bis in idem — Misuse of powers)
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, abuse of power, offence, parliamentary immunity








C_2020095EN.01002901.xml










23.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/29






Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Bilde v Parliament
(Case T-248/19) (1)

(Privileges and immunities - Member of the European Parliament - Decision to waive parliamentary immunity - Manifest error of assessment - Electa una via - Principle of ne bis in idem - Misuse of powers)
(2020/C 95/36)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Dominique Bilde (Lagarde, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz and C. Burgos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of decision P8_TA(2019)0137 of the Parliament of 12 March 2019 to withdraw the applicant’s parliamentary immunity.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Dominique Bilde to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.






(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Euro exchange ratesSource: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. 11 February 20202020/C 48/05
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020048EN.01000501.xml










12.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/5






Euro exchange rates (1)

11 February 2020
(2020/C 48/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,0901 




JPY


Japanese yen


119,73 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4721 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84325 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5373 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0667 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0953 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


24,965 




HUF


Hungarian forint


337,93 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2569 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7693 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,5775 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6260 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4495 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,4658 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7055 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5127 




KRW


South Korean won


1 290,63 




ZAR


South African rand


16,2331 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6025 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4590 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 919,11 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5059 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,061 




RUB


Russian rouble


69,3198 




THB


Thai baht


34,082 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,6995 




MXN


Mexican peso


20,3563 




INR


Indian rupee


77,6945 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-605/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — ZF v Commission (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Pension — Decision determining pension rights — Pension statements — Action for annulment — Time limit for lodging a complaint — Delay — Purely confirmatory act — Partial inadmissibility — Recovery of undue payments — Classification in grade and step — Multiplication factor — Withdrawal of an unlawful act — Legitimate expectation — Reasonable time)
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: debt, limitation of legal proceedings, pay scale, pension scheme, servant (EU), temporary employment








C_2020114EN.01000601.xml










6.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 114/6






Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — ZF v Commission
(Case T-605/18) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Pension - Decision determining pension rights - Pension statements - Action for annulment - Time limit for lodging a complaint - Delay - Purely confirmatory act - Partial inadmissibility - Recovery of undue payments - Classification in grade and step - Multiplication factor - Withdrawal of an unlawful act - Legitimate expectation - Reasonable time)
(2020/C 114/03)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZF (represented by J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by B. Mongin and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the note of 30 November 2017 by which the Office for Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the Commission amended, with effect from 1 April 2015, the applicant’s retirement pension rights, and the note of 31 January 2018 in which it informed the applicant of the amount of the balance of the European Union’s debts against him.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of ZF’s costs.






(1)  OJ C 455, 17.12.2018.
Case C-71/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 12 February 2020 — Anklagemyndigheden v VAS Shipping ApS
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, crew, foreign national, free movement of workers, freedom to provide services, harbour installation, right of establishment, vessel, work permit








C_2020137EN.01003702.xml










27.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 137/37






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 12 February 2020 — Anklagemyndigheden v VAS Shipping ApS
(Case C-71/20)
(2020/C 137/51)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Anklagemyndigheden

Defendant: VAS Shipping ApS

Question referred

Does Article 49 TFEU preclude legislation of a Member State which requires third-country crew members on a vessel flagged in a Member State and owned by a shipowner who is a national of another EU Member State to have a work permit, unless the vessel enters ports of the Member State on at most 25 occasions calculated continuously over the last year?
Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Mexican States on certain aspects of air services
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Mexico, agreement (EU), air transport








L_2020039EN.01000101.xml










12.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 39/1







Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United Mexican States on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Union and the United Mexican States on certain aspects of air services, signed in Brussels on 15 December 2010, entered into force on 22 June 2012, in accordance with Article 7(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 23 May 2012.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 February 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (06050/2019 — C9-0023/2019 — 2018/0356(NLE))
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: Committee on Development, Committee on Fisheries, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Viet Nam, free-trade agreement, ratification of an agreement, trade agreement (EU)








C_2021294EN.01006601.xml










23.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/66






P9_TA(2020)0026
Conclusion of the EU-Viet Nam Free Trade Agreement ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 February 2020 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (06050/2019 — C9-0023/2019 — 2018/0356(NLE))
(Consent)
(2021/C 294/10)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (06050/2019),










—


having regard to the draft Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and the the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (06051/2019),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 91(1), 100(2), Article 207(4) first subparagraph, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0023/2019),










—


having regard to its non-legislative resolution of 12 February 2020 (1) on the draft decision,










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Fisheries,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0003/2020),












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam.






(1)  Texts adopted of that date, P9_TA(2020)0027.
Case T-176/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Mende Omalanga v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality — Modification of the forms of order sought)
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2020103EN.01002701.xml










30.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/27






Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Mende Omalanga v Council
(Case T-176/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Right to respect for private and family life - Proportionality - Presumption of innocence - Plea of illegality - Modification of the forms of order sought)
(2020/C 103/37)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Lambert Mende Omalanga (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, S. Lejeune and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), of Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2018/569 of 12 April 2018 implementing Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2018 L 95, p. 21), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/566 of 12 April 2018 implementing Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2018 L 95, p. 9), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Lambert Mende Omalanga to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Case T-165/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Kahimbi Kasagwe v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality)
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2020103EN.01001901.xml










30.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/19






Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Kahimbi Kasagwe v Council
(Case T-165/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Right to respect for private and family life - Proportionality - Presumption of innocence - Plea of illegality)
(2020/C 103/26)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Delphin Kahimbi Kasagwe (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, H. Marcos Fraile and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Delphin Kahimbi Kasagwe to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Decision of the General Court of 12 February 2020 on judicial vacations
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: holiday, operation of the Institutions, public holiday




C_2020095EN.01000401.xml










23.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/4






DECISION OF THE GENERAL COURT
of 12 February 2020
on judicial vacations
(2020/C 95/03)
THE GENERAL COURT,
Having regard to Article 41(2) of the Rules of Procedure,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:


Article 1

For the judicial year beginning on 1 September 2020, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 41(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:






—


Christmas 2020: from Monday 21 December 2020 to Sunday 10 January 2021 inclusive,










—


Easter 2021: from Monday 29 March 2021 to Sunday 11 April 2021 inclusive,










—


Summer 2021: from Friday 16 July 2021 to Tuesday 31 August 2021 inclusive.







Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.


Luxembourg, 12 February 2020.


Registrar

E. COULON



President

M. VAN DER WOUDE
Case T-169/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Kibelisa Ngambasai v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Plea of illegality)
Date: 2020-02-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2020103EN.01002201.xml










30.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/22






Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2020 — Kibelisa Ngambasai v Council
(Case T-169/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo - Freezing of funds - Renewal of the listing of the applicant’s name on the list of persons concerned - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Obligation for the Council to communicate the new elements justifying the renewal of the restrictive measures - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Plea of illegality)
(2020/C 103/30)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Roger Kibelisa Ngambasai (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, H. Marcos Fraile and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (OJ 2017 L 328, p. 19), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Roger Kibelisa Ngambasai to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.