do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-69/20: Action brought on 4 February 2020 — Tele Columbus v Commission
Date: 2020-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU competition policy, Germany, cable distribution, economic concentration, merger control, provision of services, restriction on competition, transmission network








C_2020095EN.01004501.xml










23.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/45






Action brought on 4 February 2020 — Tele Columbus v Commission
(Case T-69/20)
(2020/C 95/55)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Tele Columbus AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Wagner and J. Hackl, Rechtsanwälte)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should,






—


annul Commission Decision C(2019) 5187 of 18 July 2019 (M.8864 — VODAFONE/CERTAIN LIBERTY GLOBAL ASSETS),










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and procedural irregularity in the examination of whether horizontal non-coordinated effects on the German ‘market for the supply of cable TV signal transmission to households in multi-dwelling-units (MDU customers)’ (‘MDU market’) significantly impede effective competition.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment in the examination of whether horizontal non-coordinated effects on the German ‘market for the supply of cable TV signal transmission to households in single-dwelling-units (SDU customers)’ significantly impede effective competition.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and procedural irregularity in the examination of whether vertical non-coordinated effects on the signal transmission market and the related MDU market in Germany significantly impede effective competition.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment in the examination of whether horizontal non-coordinated effects on the so-called feed-in market in Germany significantly impede effective competition.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and procedural irregularity in the examination of commitments since the Commission accepted a set of commitments that was inherently unsuitable from the outset to compensate for the significant impediments to competition resulting from the merger.
Case C-61/20 P: Appeal brought on 4 February 2020 by Billa AG against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 4 December 2019 in Case T-524/18, Billa AG v EUIPO
Date: 2020-02-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, retail trade, sports equipment, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2020287EN.01002702.xml










31.8.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/27






Appeal brought on 4 February 2020 by Billa AG against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 4 December 2019 in Case T-524/18, Billa AG v EUIPO
(Case C-61/20 P)
(2020/C 287/41)
Language of the case: English
By order of 28 May 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered Billa AG to bear its own costs.