do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-74/19: Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark DENIM HUNTER — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-12-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business administration, business management, clothing, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020061EN.01004101.xml










24.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/41






Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER)
(Case T-74/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark DENIM HUNTER - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 61/52)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: DK Company A/S (Ikast, Denmark) (represented by: S. Hansen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Hunter Boot (Edinburgh, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2018 (Case R 849/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hunter Boot and DK Company.

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.











2.



The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Euro exchange ratesSource: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. 18 December 20192019/C 427/01
Date: 2019-12-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019427EN.01000101.xml










19.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 427/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

18 December 2019
(2019/C 427/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1115 




JPY


Japanese yen


121,81 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4720 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85055 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4483 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0913 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0353 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,490 




HUF


Hungarian forint


330,77 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2706 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7760 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,5732 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6227 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4624 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6566 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6920 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5075 




KRW


South Korean won


1 296,56 




ZAR


South African rand


15,9700 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7783 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4486 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 558,78 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5999 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,271 




RUB


Russian rouble


69,5288 




THB


Thai baht


33,606 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,5097 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,0900 




INR


Indian rupee


78,8950 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-418/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 — Patrick Grégor Puppinck and Others v Republic of Poland, European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, European Citizens’ Initiative One of Us (Appeal — Institutional law — Citizens’ initiative ‘One of us’ — Communication from the European Commission setting out its conclusions and the reasons for not taking the action requested in the citizens’ initiative)
Date: 2019-12-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU financing, EU research policy, European citizens' initiative, abortion, development aid, embryo and foetus, judicial review, powers of the institutions (EU), right of action








C_2020068EN.01001001.xml










2.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/10






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019 — Patrick Grégor Puppinck and Others v Republic of Poland, European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union, European Citizens’ Initiative One of Us
(Case C-418/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Institutional law - Citizens’ initiative ‘One of us’ - Communication from the European Commission setting out its conclusions and the reasons for not taking the action requested in the citizens’ initiative)
(2020/C 68/06)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Patrick Grégor Puppinck, Filippo Vari, Josephine Quintavalle, Edith Frivaldszky, Jakub Baltroszewicz, Alicia Latorre Canizares, Manfred Liebner (represented by: R. Kiska, Solicitor, P. Diamond, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Citizens’ Initiative One of Us, European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, acting as Agent), Republic of Poland, European Parliament, Council of the European Union

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Patrick Grégor Puppinck, Mr Filippo Vari, Ms Josephine Quintavalle, Ms Edith Frivaldszky, Mr Jakub Baltroszewicz, Ms Alicia Latorre Canizares and Mr Manfred Liebner to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.
Case T-69/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Südwestdeutsche Salzwerke v EUIPO (Bad Reichenhaller Alpensaline) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark Bad Reichenhaller Alpensaline — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2019-12-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, aromatic plant, foodstuff, household article, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, salt, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2020061EN.01003501.xml










24.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/35






Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Südwestdeutsche Salzwerke v EUIPO (Bad Reichenhaller Alpensaline)
(Case T-69/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark Bad Reichenhaller Alpensaline - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 61/43)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Südwestdeutsche Salzwerke AG (Heilbronn, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2018 (Case R 412/2018-1) relating to an application for registration of the figurative sign Bad Reichenhaller Alpensaline as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



dismisses the action;











2.



orders Südwestdeutsche Salzwerke AG to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Case T-40/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Amigüitos pets & life v EUIPO — Société des produits Nestlé (THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect — Earlier EU word mark ONE — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2019-12-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, animal nutrition, dietary product, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2020061EN.01003302.xml










24.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/33






Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Amigüitos pets & life v EUIPO — Société des produits Nestlé (THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect)
(Case T-40/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect - Earlier EU word mark ONE - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2020/C 61/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Amigüitos pets & life, SA (Lorca, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Sakalaitė-Orlovskienė and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, A. Lambrecht and C. Elkemann, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2018 (Case R 272/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Société des produits Nestlé SA and Amigüitos pets & life.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 November 2018 (Case R 272/2018-4);











2.



Dismisses the action as to the remainder;











3.



Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Amigüitos pets & life, SA, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;











4.



Orders Société des produits Nestlé, SA to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Amigüitos pets & life, including those incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.







(1)  OJ C 93, 11.3.2019.
Case C-677/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Amoena Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 6212 and 9021 — Mastectomy bras — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 — Validity — Notion of ‘accessories’ — Sincere cooperation)
Date: 2019-12-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, clothing, common customs tariff, medical device, specification of tariff heading








C_2020068EN.01001401.xml










2.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/14






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Amoena Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
(Case C-677/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 6212 and 9021 - Mastectomy bras - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 - Validity - Notion of ‘accessories’ - Sincere cooperation)
(2020/C 68/11)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Amoena Ltd

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Operative part of the judgment

The examination of the questions referred has not revealed any elements capable of affecting the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1167 of 26 June 2017 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature.


(1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
Case T-28/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Karlovarské minerální vody v EUIPO — Aguas de San Martín de Veri (VERITEA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark VERITEA — Earlier EU word mark VERI — AGUA PURA DEL PIRINEO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2019-12-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, tea, trade-mark law








C_2020061EN.01003301.xml










24.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/33






Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Karlovarské minerální vody v EUIPO — Aguas de San Martín de Veri (VERITEA)
(Case T-28/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark VERITEA - Earlier EU word mark VERI - AGUA PURA DEL PIRINEO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons)
(2020/C 61/40)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Karlovarské minerální vody a.s. (Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Mrázek, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite, J. Crespo Carrillo and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Aguas de San Martín de Veri, SA (Bisaurri, Spain) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2018 (Case R 499/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Aguas de San Martín de Veri and Karlovarské minerální vody.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Karlovarské minerální vody a.s. to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.