do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9331 – Danaher/GE Healthcare Life Sciences Biopharma) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 204/04
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, goods and services, marketing, merger control, pharmaceutical industry, research and development, software








C_2020204EN.01001001.xml










18.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 204/10






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9331 – Danaher/GE Healthcare Life Sciences Biopharma)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 204/04)
On 18 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9331. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
European Parliament decision of 18 December 2019 electing the European Ombudsman (2019/2042(INS))
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European Ombudsman, appointment of members








C_2021255EN.01010301.xml










29.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/103






P9_TA(2019)0096
Election of the Ombudsman
European Parliament decision of 18 December 2019 electing the European Ombudsman (2019/2042(INS))
(2021/C 255/26)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 24 and Article 228 thereof,










—


having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,










—


having regard to its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties (1),










—


having regard to Rule 231 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the call for nominations (2),










—


having regard to its vote of 18 December 2019,












1.


Elects Emily O’REILLY to exercise the function of European Ombudsman until the end of the parliamentary term;












2.


Requests Emily O’REILLY to take an oath before the Court of Justice;












3.


Instructs its President to have the annexed decision published in the Official Journal of the European Union;












4.


Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Council, the Commission and the Court of Justice.






(1)  OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.

(2)  OJ C 293, 30.8.2019, p. 1.





ANNEX


DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 18 December 2019
electing the European Ombudsman
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 24 and Article 228 thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,
Having regard to its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties (1),
Having regard to Rule 231 of its Rules of Procedure,
Having regard to the call for nominations (2),
Having regard to its vote of 18 December 2019,
HAS DECIDED:
to elect Emily O’REILLY to exercise the function of European Ombudsman until the end of the parliamentary term.

Done at Strasbourg, 18 December 2019.


For the European Parliament


The President

D. M. SASSOLI




(1)  OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 15.

(2)  OJ C 293, 30.8.2019, p. 1.
Case T-192/19: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Ceramica Flaminia v EUIPO — Ceramica Cielo (goclean) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark goclean — Revocation of the contested decision — Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, plumbing equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020061EN.01004301.xml










24.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/43






Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Ceramica Flaminia v EUIPO — Ceramica Cielo (goclean)
(Case T-192/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark goclean - Revocation of the contested decision - Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 61/54)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Ceramica Flaminia (Civita Castellana, Italy) (represented by: A. Improda and R. Arista, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ceramica Cielo SpA (Fabrica di Roma, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 January 2019 (Case R 991/2018-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Ceramica Cielo and Ceramica Flaminia.

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no need to adjudicate on the action.











2.



The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.
Case T-12/19: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Nowhere v EUIPO — Junguo Ye (APE TEES) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, clothing, footwear industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, leather, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020061EN.01004001.xml










24.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/40






Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Nowhere v EUIPO — Junguo Ye (APE TEES)
(Case T-12/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 61/50)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Nowhere Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japon) (represented by: A. Norris, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Junguo Ye (Elche, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2018 (Case R 2474/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Nowhere and Mr Ye.

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.











2.



The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
Special Report No 25/2019
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU aid, Treasury, budget policy, budgetary control, economic reform, eligibility criteria, financial aid, national budget, reflation, sustainable development








C_2019425EN.01000501.xml










18.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 425/5






Special Report No 25/2019
‘Data quality in budget support: weaknesses in some indicators and in the verification of the payment for variable tranches’
(2019/C 425/05)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 25/2019 ‘Data quality in budget support: weaknesses in some indicators and in the verification of the payment for variable tranches’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Board of Appeal for Administrative Matters dated 18 December 2019 in the case Adpublisher AG v J (Case E-11/19) 2020/C 110/07
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Liechtenstein, appeal to an administrative authority, data protection, data-processing law, disclosure of information, legal expenses, natural person, personal data, protection of privacy, supervisory body








C_2020110EN.01000801.xml










2.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 110/8






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by the Board of Appeal for Administrative Matters dated 18 December 2019 in the case Adpublisher AG v J
(Case E-11/19)
(2020/C 110/07)
A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 18 December 2019 from the Board of Appeal for Administrative Matters (Beschwerdekommission für Verwaltungsangelegenheiten), which was received at the Court Registry on 23 December 2019, for an Advisory Opinion in the case Adpublisher AG v J on the following questions:






1.


Does it follow from Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR) or from another provision of EEA law that an adversarial general procedure to hear a complaint may be carried out under the GDPR without disclosing the name and address of the complainant in the complaint procedure?
If the answer to the question is in the affirmative: Is it necessary in this case that a legitimate reason for the anonymisation is at least prima facie established or are no reasons required for the anonymisation?










2.


Must a Member State ensure in its national procedural law that in a procedure to hear a complaint in accordance with Article 77 of the GDPR all further national appellate bodies are free of charge for the data subject and that the data subject may also not be ordered to reimburse the costs?










3.


If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative and Question 2 is answered in the negative, in other words, an adversarial general procedure to hear a complaint may be carried out under the GDPR without identifying the name and address of the complainant in the complaint procedure and national procedural law is not required to ensure that in a procedure to hear a complaint in accordance with Article 77 of the GDPR all further national appellate bodies are free of charge for the data subject, the question arises how a decision resulting from a complaint procedure and ordering the data subject – who remains, however, anonymous –can be effected to reimburse the costs?
Case T-734/18: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: animal welfare, chemical product, insecticide, market approval, plant health control, plant health treatment, rights of the defence








C_2020068EN.01007101.xml










2.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/71






Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission
(Case T-734/18) (1)

(2020/C 68/79)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2019 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of The Gambia and of the Protocol on the implementation of that Partnership Agreement (08974/2019 — C9-0106/2019 — 2019/0076(NLE))
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Development, Committee on Fisheries, European Parliament
Subjects: The Gambia, agreement (EU), catch area, fishing agreement, fishing rights, fishing vessel, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement, sea fishing, sustainable fisheries








C_2021255EN.01010601.xml










29.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/106






P9_TA(2019)0098
EU-Gambia Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and the Implementation Protocol thereto ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 18 December 2019 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of The Gambia and of the Protocol on the implementation of that Partnership Agreement (08974/2019 — C9-0106/2019 — 2019/0076(NLE))
(Consent)
(2021/C 255/28)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (08974/2019),










—


having regard to the draft Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of The Gambia (08984/2019),










—


having regard to the draft Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of The Gambia (09949/2019),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0106/2019),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Budgets,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries (A9-0026/2019),












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement and of the protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of The Gambia.
Euro exchange ratesSource: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. 17 December 20192019/C 425/03
Date: 2019-12-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019425EN.01000301.xml










18.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 425/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

17 December 2019
(2019/C 425/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1162 




JPY


Japanese yen


122,31 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4731 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84748 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4718 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0946 




ISK


Iceland króna


136,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0648 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,445 




HUF


Hungarian forint


329,71 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2595 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7771 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,5622 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6294 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4690 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6953 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6974 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5132 




KRW


South Korean won


1 299,38 




ZAR


South African rand


16,0926 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8090 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4465 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 615,64 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6239 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,413 




RUB


Russian rouble


69,8758 




THB


Thai baht


33,737 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,5409 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,1278 




INR


Indian rupee


79,2035 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.