do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2019/2188 of 11 December 2019 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq) (EUAM Iraq/3/2019)
Date: 2019-12-11
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: EU police mission, Iraq, appointment of members, fight against crime, public safety, the EU's international role








L_2019330EN.01005001.xml










20.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 330/50








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2019/2188
of 11 December 2019
         
on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq) (EUAM Iraq/3/2019)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 of 16 October 2017 on the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq) (1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.












(2)


Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869, Mr Markus RITTER was appointed as Head of Mission of EUAM Iraq.












(3)


On 15 October 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1545 (2) extending the mandate of EUAM Iraq until 17 April 2020.












(4)


On 11 November 2019, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Christoph BUIK as Head of Mission of EUAM Iraq from 1 January 2020 to 17 April 2020,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Christoph BUIK is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq) from 1 January 2020 to 17 April 2020.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 1 January 2020.




Done at Brussels, 11 December 2019.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

S. FROM-EMMESBERGER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 266, 17.10.2017, p. 12.

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1545 of 15 October 2018 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/1869 on the European Union Advisory Mission in support of Security Sector Reform in Iraq (EUAM Iraq) (OJ L 259, 16.10.2018, p. 31).
Case T-873/19: Action brought on 11 December 2019 — Multi-Service v Commission
Date: 2019-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: environmental law, exchange of information, fluorine, greenhouse gas, information system, market approval, reduction of gas emissions








C_2020087EN.01002002.xml










16.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 87/20






Action brought on 11 December 2019 — Multi-Service v Commission
(Case T-873/19)
(2020/C 87/25)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Multi-Service S.A. (Kwidzyn, Poland) (represented by: P. Jankowski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Commission Decision ARES (2019) 6103796 of 3 October 2019 concerning registration in the registry in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661, Registry ID 9920, and re-registration of the undertaking in the registry;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings;










—


admit as evidence the letter of 23 October 2019.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.
The applicant alleges that the defendant infringed Article 17 of Regulation No 517/2014, in conjunction with Article 6 of Implementing Regulation 2019/661, in so far as it wrongly removed the registration of the applicant undertaking from the registry for hydrofluorocarbons (HFC).
Special Report No 23/2019 Farmers’ income stabilisation: comprehensive set of tools, but low uptake of instruments and overcompensation need to be tackled2019/C 416/07
Date: 2019-12-11
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU aid, adaptation to climate change, agricultural insurance, aid system, aid to agriculture, common agricultural policy, environmental risk prevention, farmers' income, farming system, risk management








C_2019416EN.01001301.xml










11.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 416/13






Special Report No 23/2019
‘Farmers’ income stabilisation: comprehensive set of tools, but low uptake of instruments and overcompensation need to be tackled’
(2019/C 416/07)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 23/2019 Farmers’ income stabilisation: comprehensive set of tools, but low uptake of instruments and overcompensation need to be tackled has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu.
Euro exchange ratesSource: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. 10 December 20192019/C 416/05
Date: 2019-12-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019416EN.01001101.xml










11.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 416/11






Euro exchange rates (1)

10 December 2019
(2019/C 416/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1077 




JPY


Japanese yen


120,27 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4731 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84073 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5565 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0922 




ISK


Iceland króna


134,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1823 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,527 




HUF


Hungarian forint


330,85 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2903 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7773 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,4300 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6275 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4666 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6691 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6945 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5062 




KRW


South Korean won


1 320,74 




ZAR


South African rand


16,4121 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7968 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4398 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 518,88 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6130 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,243 




RUB


Russian rouble


70,4627 




THB


Thai baht


33,558 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,5891 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,2903 




INR


Indian rupee


78,5610 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-909/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iași (Romania) lodged on 11 December 2019 — BX v Unitatea administrativ-teritorială D.
Date: 2019-12-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: in-service training, labour law, rest period, traineeship, work schedule








C_2020201EN.01000502.xml










15.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iași (Romania) lodged on 11 December 2019 — BX v Unitatea administrativ-teritorială D.
(Case C-909/19)
(2020/C 201/08)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Iași

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: BX

Respondent: Unitatea administrativ-teritorială D.

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the period of time during which a worker attends mandatory vocational training courses after completing his or her normal hours of work, at the premises of the training services provider, away from his or her place of work, and without performing any of his or her service duties, constitutes ‘working time’?










2.


In the event that the first question is answered in the negative, are Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 2(2), Article 3, Article 5 and Article 6 of Directive 2003/88/EC to be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, while establishing the need for employees to undertake vocational training, does not oblige employers to observe workers’ rest periods in so far as concerns the time during which training courses are to be attended?






(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).
Case C-708/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul București — Romania) — TK v Asociația de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7 and 8 — Directive 95/46/EC — Article 6(1)(c) and Article 7(f) — Making the processing of personal data legitimate — National legislation allowing video surveillance for the purposes of ensuring the safety and protection of individuals, property and valuables and for the pursuit of legitimate interests, without the data subject’s consent — Installation of a video surveillance system in the common parts of a residential building)
Date: 2019-12-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data protection, housing, personal data, principle of proportionality, video surveillance








C_2020054EN.01000801.xml










17.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/8






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul București — Romania) — TK v Asociația de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA
(Case C-708/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 7 and 8 - Directive 95/46/EC - Article 6(1)(c) and Article 7(f) - Making the processing of personal data legitimate - National legislation allowing video surveillance for the purposes of ensuring the safety and protection of individuals, property and valuables and for the pursuit of legitimate interests, without the data subject’s consent - Installation of a video surveillance system in the common parts of a residential building)
(2020/C 54/10)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: TK

Defendant: Asociația de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(1)(c) and Article 7(f) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, read in the light of Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions which authorise the installation of a video surveillance system, such as the system at issue in the main proceedings, installed in the common parts of a residential building, for the purposes of pursuing legitimate interests of ensuring the safety and protection of individuals and property, without the consent of the data subjects, if the processing of personal data carried out by means of the video surveillance system at issue fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 7(f), which it is for the referring court to determine.


(1)  OJ C 65, 18.2.2019.
Case C-431/18: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial Sección No 4 de Zaragoza — Spain) — María Pilar Bueno Ruiz and Zurich Insurance PL, Sucursal de España v Irene Conte Sánchez (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2009/103/EC — First paragraph of Article 3 — Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ — Leaks of oil and other liquids from a motor vehicle — Damages)
Date: 2019-12-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: chemical accident, compulsory insurance, damages, insurance indemnity, motor vehicle insurance, parking area, third-party insurance, transport accident








C_2020068EN.01001901.xml










2.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/19






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial Sección No 4 de Zaragoza — Spain) — María Pilar Bueno Ruiz and Zurich Insurance PL, Sucursal de España v Irene Conte Sánchez
(Case C-431/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 2009/103/EC - First paragraph of Article 3 - Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ - Leaks of oil and other liquids from a motor vehicle - Damages)
(2020/C 68/17)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial Sección No 4 de Zaragoza

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: María Pilar Bueno Ruiz and Zurich Insurance PL, Sucursal de España

Defendant: Irene Conte Sánchez

Operative part of the order

The first paragraph of Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘use of vehicles’, referred to in that provision, covers a situation in which a vehicle which has been manoeuvred and/or parked in a private car park, in accordance with its function as a means of transport, is involved in an accident in that car park.


(1)  OJ C 373, 15.10.2018.