do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9583 — TPG/Hong Leong Group/Columbia Asia Healthcare) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 5/01
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, financial services, health care, holding company, investment company, medical centre, medical institution, merger control, real estate business








C_2020005EN.01000101.xml










9.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 5/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9583 — TPG/Hong Leong Group/Columbia Asia Healthcare)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 5/01)
On 10 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9583. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9672 — Apollo/Gamenet) (Text with EEA relevance) 2019/C 424/03
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, financial services, game of chance, gaming establishment, health care, insurance, investment company, merger control, real estate business








C_2019424EN.01000301.xml










17.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9672 — Apollo/Gamenet)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 424/03)
On 10 December 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9672. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2118 of 10 December 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1693 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of steel road wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, steel, vehicle parts








L_2019320EN.01011501.xml










11.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 320/115








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/2118
of 10 December 2019
         
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1693 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of steel road wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,


After consulting the Member States,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1693 (2) imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of steel road wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China was published on 10 October 2019,












(2)


In Annex I to the Regulation published, the TARIC additional codes were missing. Therefore, Annex I should be amended in order to add the missing TARIC additional codes,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The table in Annex I should be replaced as follows:






‘Name


TARIC additional code




Dongfeng Automobile Chassis System Co., Ltd (also called ‘Dongfeng Automotive Wheel Co., Ltd’)


C511




Hangzhou Forlong Impex Co., Ltd


C512




Hangzhou Xingjie Auto Parts Manufacturing Co., Ltd


C513




Jiaxing Henko Auto Spare Parts Co., Ltd


C514




Jining Junda Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd


C515




Nantong Tuenz Corporate Co., Ltd


C516




Ningbo Luxiang Autoparts Manufacturing Co., Ltd


C517




Shandong Zhengshang Wheel Technology Co., Ltd


C518




Shandong Zhengyu Wheel Group Co., Ltd


C519




Xiamen Sunrise Group Co., Ltd


C520




Yantai Leeway Electromechanical Equipment Co., Ltd


C521




Yongkang Yuefei Wheel Co., Ltd


C522




Zhejiang Jingu Co., Ltd


C523




Zhejiang Fengchi Mechanical Co., Ltd


C524




Zhengxing Wheel Group Co., Ltd


C525




Zhenjiang R&D Auto Parts Co., Ltd


C526’






Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 December 2019.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  
            OJ L 259, 10.10.2019, p. 15.
Case T-838/19: Action brought on 10 December 2019 – Koopman International v EUIPO – Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products Import & Export (Fluid distribution equipement)
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, plumbing equipment








C_2020045EN.01008801.xml










10.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/88






Action brought on 10 December 2019 – Koopman International v EUIPO – Tinnus Enterprises and Mystic Products Import & Export (Fluid distribution equipement)
(Case T-838/19)
(2020/C 45/74)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Koopman International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: B. van Werven, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) and Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Tinnus Enterprises

Design at issue: European Union design No 1431 829-0006

Contested decision: Interim Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 September 2019 in Case R 1005/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision to suspend the appeal proceedings before the Board of Appeal and decide that said proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall continue;










—


to join the current case before the General Court with the cases before the General Court in cases R 1006/2018-3, R 1008/2018-3, R 1010/2018-3 and R 1009/2018-3 lodged by Koopman International simultaneous with this action;










—


order Tinnus Enterprises to pay Koopman International’s costs and fees.





Pleas in law







—


The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘legal certainty’;










—


The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘economy of proceedings’;










—


The Board of Appeal failed to correctly assess and apply the criterion of ‘sound administration’;










—


The Board of Appeal did not correctly balance the interests of all parties.
Case T-319/19: Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Gollnisch v Parliament (Action for annulment — Institutional law — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme — Regulatory act — Deadline for bringing an action — Out of time — Act not open to challenge — Disregard of the procedural requirements — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, limitation of legal proceedings, pension scheme








C_2020061EN.01004501.xml










24.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/45






Order of the General Court of 10 December 2019 — Gollnisch v Parliament
(Case T-319/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Institutional law - Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament - Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme - Regulatory act - Deadline for bringing an action - Out of time - Act not open to challenge - Disregard of the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 61/57)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (Lilliers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z. Nagy and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 10 December 2018 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (OJ 2018, C 466, p. 8), the letter of 26 March 2019 from the President of the Parliament rejecting the administrative appeal brought against the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament and all acts adopted as a consequence thereof.

Operative part of the order







1.



The action is dismissed as inadmissible.











2.



Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.







(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.
Euro exchange ratesSource: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. 9 December 20192019/C 414/07
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019414EN.01001301.xml










10.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/13






Euro exchange rates (1)

9 December 2019
(2019/C 414/07)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1075 




JPY


Japanese yen


120,15 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4723 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84195 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5435 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0959 




ISK


Iceland króna


134,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1238 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,528 




HUF


Hungarian forint


331,58 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2837 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7789 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,4270 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6228 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4675 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6692 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6890 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5060 




KRW


South Korean won


1 319,29 




ZAR


South African rand


16,1780 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7960 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4388 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 506,11 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6074 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,316 




RUB


Russian rouble


70,5731 




THB


Thai baht


33,571 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,5903 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,3499 




INR


Indian rupee


78,7070 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-908/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by European Food SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 10 October 2019 in Case T-536/18, Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (FITNESS)
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, cereal product, cereals, foodstuff, human nutrition, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020201EN.01000501.xml










15.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 201/5






Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by European Food SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 10 October 2019 in Case T-536/18, Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — European Food (FITNESS)
(Case C-908/19 P)
(2020/C 201/07)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Food SA (represented by: R. Dincă, I. Speciac, V. Stănese, I.-F. Cofaru, avocați)

Other parties to the proceedings: Société des produits Nestlé, European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 18 March 2020, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) decided that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9521— Bamesa/Sumitomo/Steel Centre Europe) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2019/C 414/10
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: distributor, economic concentration, iron and steel industry, merger control








C_2019414EN.01003201.xml










10.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/32






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9521— Bamesa/Sumitomo/Steel Centre Europe)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 414/10)

1.   
On 3 December 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Bamesa Aceros S.L. (‘Bamesa’, Spain), controlled by ARMASFI S.L.,










—


Sumitomo Corporation (‘Sumitomo’, Japan),










—


Steel Centre Europe s.r.o. (‘SCE’, Czech Republic).




Bamesa and Sumitomo acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of SCE. Prior to the transaction, Sumitomo was already a shareholder in SCE.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Bamesa: distribution of steel through steel service centres,










—


for Sumitomo: trading of metal products, transportation and construction systems, environment and infrastructure, chemicals and electronics, media, networks and lifestyle related goods, mineral resources, energy and life sciences,










—


for SCE: distribution of steel through steel service centres, mainly in the Czech Republic.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M. 9521 — Bamesa/Sumitomo/Steel Centre Europe
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt apply2019/C 414/04
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Egypt, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2019414EN.01001001.xml










10.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/10






Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt apply
(2019/C 414/04)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Mohamed Zohir Mohamed Wahed Garrana and Mr Habib Ibrahim Habib Eladli who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt.
The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons. The above-mentioned persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the elements the Council holds in its file regarding their designation, before 19 December 2019, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
In this regard, the attention of the person concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list of designated persons in Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.


(1)  OJ L 76 22.3.2011, p. 63.

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo apply2019/C 414/06
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, EU restrictive measure, arms control, arms trade, data protection, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data








C_2019414EN.01001201.xml










10.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/12






Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo apply
(2019/C 414/06)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of RELEX (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is RELEX.1.C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Case C-902/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by Esim Chemicals GmbH against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 9 October 2019 in Case T-713/18, Esim Chemicals v EUIPO
Date: 2019-12-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, chemical industry, pharmaceutical industry, preservative, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020161EN.01001701.xml










11.5.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/17






Appeal brought on 10 December 2019 by Esim Chemicals GmbH against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 9 October 2019 in Case T-713/18, Esim Chemicals v EUIPO
(Case C-902/19 P)
(2020/C 161/25)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Esim Chemicals GmbH (represented by: I. Rungg, Rechtsanwalt, I. Innerhofer, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 3 March 2020 the Court of JusticeJustice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal is not allowed to proceed and that Esim Chemicals GmbH shall bear its own costs.