do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation2019/C 409/07
Date: 2019-12-05
Institutions: Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: Estonia, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency








C_2019409EN.01005401.xml










5.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/54






New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
(2019/C 409/07)




National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Estonia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Estonia

Subject of commemoration: The centenary of the University of Tartu

Description of the design: The coin will mark the centenary of the University of Tartu as being established as the first Estonian language university. It was founded in 1632 by Swedish King Gustav II Adolf and is one of the oldest universities in northern and eastern Europe. In 1919 it became the first Estonian language university.
The design depicts a motif of the main building of the university. It also bears the inscriptions ‘RAHVUSÜLIKOOL 100’(National University 100) and ‘UNIVERSITAS TARTUENSIS’, the year ‘1632’, the issuing country ‘EESTI’ and the year of issuance ‘2019’.
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Estimated number of coins to be issued: 1 000 000

Date of issue: November 2019


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).
Case C-421/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur — Belgium) — Ordre des avocats du barreau de Dinant v JN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Article 7(1)(a) — Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract — Concept of ‘matters relating to a contract’ — Claim for payment of annual fees payable by a lawyer to a bar association)
Date: 2019-12-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: claim, contract, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, lawyer, payment, professional society








C_2020036EN.01000801.xml










3.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/8






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur — Belgium) — Ordre des avocats du barreau de Dinant v JN
(Case C-421/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Article 7(1)(a) - Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract - Concept of ‘matters relating to a contract’ - Claim for payment of annual fees payable by a lawyer to a bar association)
(2020/C 36/10)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Namur

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ordre des avocats du barreau de Dinant

Defendant: JN

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that a dispute concerning a lawyer’s obligation to pay annual professional fees for which he or she is liable to the bar association to which he or she belongs comes within the scope of that regulation only if, in calling on that lawyer to perform that obligation, the bar association is not acting, under the national law applicable, in the exercise of public powers, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.
Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation No 1215/2012 must be interpreted as meaning that an action by which a bar association seeks an order that one of its members pay the annual professional fees for which he or she is liable and which are essentially intended to finance services, such as insurance services, must be regarded as constituting an action in ‘matters relating to a contract’, within the meaning of that provision, provided that those fees constitute consideration for services provided by that bar association to its members and those services are freely consented to by the member concerned, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.


(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.
Case C-642/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 December 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2008/98/EC — Articles 30 and 33 — Waste management plans — Autonomous Communities of the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands (Spain) — Obligation to revise — Obligation to notify the Commission — No proper formal notice — Letter of formal notice sent prematurely — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2019-12-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Balearic Islands, Canary Islands, admissibility, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, prevention of pollution, waste management








C_2020036EN.01001301.xml










3.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/13






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 December 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
(Case C-642/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2008/98/EC - Articles 30 and 33 - Waste management plans - Autonomous Communities of the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands (Spain) - Obligation to revise - Obligation to notify the Commission - No proper formal notice - Letter of formal notice sent prematurely - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 36/16)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and E. Sanfrutos Cano and F. Thiran, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action as inadmissible;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.
Case C-897/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovni sud (Croatia) lodged on 5 December 2019 — Russian Federation
Date: 2019-12-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Iceland, Norway, Schengen Agreement, agreement (EU), extradition, foreign national








C_2020045EN.01003301.xml










10.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/33






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovni sud (Croatia) lodged on 5 December 2019 — Russian Federation
(Case C-897/19)
(2020/C 45/31)
Language of the case: Croatian

Referring court

Vrhovni sud

Parties to the main proceedings

I.N.
Russian Federation

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 18 TFEU be interpreted as meaning that a Member State of the European Union which gives a ruling on the extradition to a third State of a national of a State that is not a Member State of the European Union but is a Member State of the Schengen area is required to inform that Member State of the Schengen area which granted nationality to that person of the extradition request?










2.


If the answer to the preceding question is in the affirmative and the Member State of the Schengen area has requested the surrender of that person in order to conduct the proceedings in respect of which extradition is requested, must that person be surrendered to that State, in accordance with the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway?
Case C-896/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Qorti Ċivili Prim’Awla — Ġurisdizzjoni Kostituzzjonali (Malta) lodged on 5 December 2019 — Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru
Date: 2019-12-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Malta, appointment of members, constitution, head of government, judge, right to justice, separation of powers








C_2020077EN.01002701.xml










9.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/27






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Qorti Ċivili Prim’Awla — Ġurisdizzjoni Kostituzzjonali (Malta) lodged on 5 December 2019 — Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru
(Case C-896/19)
(2020/C 77/38)
Language of the case: Maltese

Referring court

Qorti Ċivili Prim’Awla — Ġurisdizzjoni Kostituzzjonali

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Repubblika

Defendant: Il-Prim Ministru

Questions referred







1.


Should the second [subparagraph] of Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, read separately or together, be considered to be applicable with respect to the legal validity of Articles 96, 96A and 100 of the Constitution of Malta?










2.


If the first question elicits an affirmative answer, should the power of the Prime Minister in the process of the appointment of members of the judiciary in Malta be considered to be in conformity with Article 19(1) TEU and with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, considered as well in the light of Article 96A of the Constitution, which entered into effect in 2016?










3.


If the power of the Prime Minister is found to be incompatible, should this fact be taken into consideration with regard to future appointments or should it affect previous appointments as well?
Notice of open competition2019/C 409/08
Date: 2019-12-05
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, aid policy, competition (EU), international cooperation, third country








C_2019409EN.01005501.xml










5.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 409/55






Notice of open competition
(2019/C 409/08)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:
EPSO/AD/380/19 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 7/AD 9) IN THE FIELD OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND MANAGING AID TO NON-EU COUNTRIES
The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal of the European Union C 409 A of 5 December 2019.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/
Decision (EU) 2019/2071 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 December 2019 appointing the European Data Protection Supervisor
Date: 2019-12-05
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: European Data Protection Supervisor, appointment of members








LI2019316EN.01000101.xml










6.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


LI 316/1








            DECISION (EU) 2019/2071 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
         
of 5 December 2019
         
appointing the European Data Protection Supervisor


THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (1), and in particular Article 53(1) thereof,


Having regard to the list of candidates drawn up by the European Commission on 30 October 2019, in accordance with Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, following a public call for candidates, with a view to the appointment of the European Data Protection Supervisor,

Whereas:







(1)


By Decision 2014/886/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (2), Mr Giovanni BUTTARELLI was appointed as the European Data Protection Supervisor and Mr Wojciech Rafał WIEWIÓROWSKI as the Assistant Supervisor, for the period from 4 December 2014 to 5 December 2019.












(2)


Mr Giovanni BUTTARELLI passed away on 20 August 2019. In accordance with Article 100(4) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the Assistant Supervisor therefore replaced the European Data Protection Supervisor for the remainder of the Assistant Supervisor’s term of office, which comes to an end on 5 December 2019.












(3)


The European Data Protection Supervisor is to be appointed by common accord between the European Parliament and the Council for a period of five years from 6 December 2019,





HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Wojciech Rafał WIEWIÓROWSKI is hereby appointed as the European Data Protection Supervisor for the period from 6 December 2019 to 5 December 2024.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on 5 December 2019.




Done at Brussels, 5 December 2019.


For the European Parliament


The President

D. M. SASSOLI
            



For the Council


The President

M. LINTILÄ
            





(1)  
            OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  Decision 2014/886/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2014 appointing the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Assistant Supervisor (OJ L 351, 9.12.2014, p. 9).