do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-541/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — XW v Eurowings GmbH
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, traveller








C_2020137EN.01004404.xml










27.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 137/44






Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — XW v Eurowings GmbH
(Case C-541/19) (1)

(2020/C 137/68)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.
European Parliament decision of 26 November 2019 on the nomination of Nikolaos Milionis as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0125/2019 — 2019/0812(NLE))
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2021232EN.01007601.xml










16.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 232/76






P9_TA(2019)0064
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Nikolaos Milionis
European Parliament decision of 26 November 2019 on the nomination of Nikolaos Milionis as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0125/2019 — 2019/0812(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2021/C 232/19)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0125/2019),










—


having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0027/2019),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 12 November 2019 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Nikolaos Milionis as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, to the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (OJ L 150, 14.6.2018)
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: agricultural product, agricultural production, consumer protection, food inspection, genetically modified organism, harmonisation of standards, labelling, organic farming, organic product








L_2019305EN.01005901.xml










26.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 305/59







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007
(

Official Journal of the European Union L 150 of 14 June 2018

)

On page 12, recital 82:

for:








‘(82)


Organic production is only credible if accompanied by effective verification and controls at all stages of production, processing and distribution.’,






read:







‘(82)


Organic production is only credible if accompanied by effective verification and controls at all stages of production, preparation and distribution.’.





On page 23, point (e) of Article 5:

for:







‘(e)


ensuring the integrity of organic production at all stages of the production, processing and distribution of food and feed;’,





read:






‘(e)


ensuring the integrity of organic production at all stages of the production, preparation and distribution of food and feed;’.




On page 69, point 1.9.4.1(f) of Part II of Annex II:

for:







‘(f)


92 days for Mallard ducks;’,





read:






‘(f)


92 days for Mulard ducks;’.
Euro exchange ratesSource: reference exchange rate published by the ECB. 25 November 20192019/C 400/10
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019400EN.01001501.xml










26.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/15






Euro exchange rates (1)

25 November 2019
(2019/C 400/10)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1008 




JPY


Japanese yen


119,88 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4716 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85515 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,6158 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0986 




ISK


Iceland króna


135,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1065 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,485 




HUF


Hungarian forint


335,23 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2965 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7723 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,3196 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6232 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4648 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6164 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7187 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5030 




KRW


South Korean won


1 293,96 




ZAR


South African rand


16,2262 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7454 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4365 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 512,47 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5997 




PHP


Philippine peso


55,915 




RUB


Russian rouble


70,4399 




THB


Thai baht


33,272 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,6295 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,3437 




INR


Indian rupee


78,9370 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Notice for the attention of a person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine2019/C 400/05
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2019400EN.01000501.xml










26.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/5






Notice for the attention of a person subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine
(2019/C 400/05)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Viktor Ivanovych Ratushniak who appears in the Annex to Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine.
The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned person. The above-mentioned person is hereby informed that he may submit a request to the Council to obtain the elements the Council holds in its file regarding his designation, before 6 December 2019, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
In this regard, the attention of the person concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list of designated persons in Decision 2014/119/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 208/2014.


(1)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26.

(2)  OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, p. 1.
Case C-871/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze v TB
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: drivers, driving period, motor vehicle, penalty, road transport, speed control, traffic offence








C_2020054EN.01003502.xml










17.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/35






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze v TB
(Case C-871/19)
(2020/C 54/39)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze

Defendant: TB

Question referred

May Article 15 [(7) of Regulation No 3821/85] (1) be interpreted, in the specific case of the driver of the motor vehicle, as a rule which prescribes a single, overall form of conduct and, therefore, entails the commission of a single infringement and the imposition of a single penalty, or may it result, through the cumulation of penalties for each act of omission, in as many infringements and penalties as the number of days in relation to which the record sheets for the tachograph have not been produced in the context of the timeframe laid down (‘current day and the previous 28 days’)?


(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport (OJ 1985 L 370, p. 8).
Case C-395/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance de Nice — France) — VT, WU v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carrier, consumer protection, electronic document, indemnification, technological change, ticket, traveller








C_2020045EN.01003403.xml










10.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/34






Order of the President of the Court of 26 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance de Nice — France) — VT, WU v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd
(Case C-395/19) (1)

(2020/C 45/34)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 246, 22.7.2019.
European Parliament decision of 26 November 2019 on the nomination of Joëlle Elvinger as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0122/2019 — 2019/0815(NLE))
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2021232EN.01007301.xml










16.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 232/73






P9_TA(2019)0061
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Joëlle Elvinger
European Parliament decision of 26 November 2019 on the nomination of Joëlle Elvinger as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0122/2019 — 2019/0815(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2021/C 232/16)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0122/2019),










—


having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0030/2019),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 12 November 2019 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Joëlle Elvinger as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, to the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
Case C-864/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 26 November 2019 — NH v Deutsche Lufthansa AG
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier








C_2020068EN.01003202.xml










2.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 68/32






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 26 November 2019 — NH v Deutsche Lufthansa AG
(Case C-864/19)
(2020/C 68/35)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: NH

Defendant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG
The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 9 January 2020.
Case C-870/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze v MI
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: drivers, driving period, motor vehicle, penalty, road transport, speed control, traffic offence








C_2020054EN.01003501.xml










17.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/35






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 26 November 2019 — Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze v MI
(Case C-870/19)
(2020/C 54/38)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze

Defendant: MI

Question referred

May Article 15 [(7) of Regulation No 3821/85] (1) be interpreted, in the specific case of the driver of the motor vehicle, as a rule which prescribes a single, overall form of conduct and, therefore, entails the commission of a single infringement and the imposition of a single penalty, or may it result, through the cumulation of penalties for each act of omission, in as many infringements and penalties as the number of days in relation to which the record sheets for the tachograph have not been produced in the context of the timeframe laid down (‘current day and the previous 28 days’)?


(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport (OJ 1985 L 370, p. 8).
European Parliament decision of 26 November 2019 on the nomination of Alex Brenninkmeijer as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0126/2019 — 2019/0813(NLE))
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, European Parliament
Subjects: appointment of members, member of the Court of Auditors (EU)








C_2021232EN.01007501.xml










16.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 232/75






P9_TA(2019)0063
Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors — Alex Brenninkmeijer
European Parliament decision of 26 November 2019 on the nomination of Alex Brenninkmeijer as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C9-0126/2019 — 2019/0813(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2021/C 232/18)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0126/2019),










—


having regard to Rule 129 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A9-0028/2019),










A.


whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










B.


whereas at its meeting of 12 November 2019 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;












1.


Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Alex Brenninkmeijer as a Member of the Court of Auditors;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, to the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 November 2019 on the draft Council decision on conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and Ukraine amending the trade preferences for poultry meat and poultry meat preparations provided for by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (10720/2019 — C9-0105/2019 — 2019/0132(NLE))
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: EAEC, Ukraine, association agreement (EU), import (EU), meat product, poultrymeat, ratification of an agreement, tariff quota, trade agreement (EU)








C_2021232EN.01007001.xml










16.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 232/70






P9_TA(2019)0059
EU-Ukraine Agreement amending the trade preferences for poultry meat and poultry meat preparations provided for by the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 November 2019 on the draft Council decision on conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and Ukraine amending the trade preferences for poultry meat and poultry meat preparations provided for by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (10720/2019 — C9-0105/2019 — 2019/0132(NLE))
(Consent)
(2021/C 232/14)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (10720/2019),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and Ukraine amending the trade preferences for poultry meat and poultry meat preparations provided for by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (1),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0105/2019),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A9-0024/2019),












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Ukraine.






(1)  OJ L 206, 6.8.2019, p. 3.
Case T-711/18: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Wyld v EUIPO — Kaufland Warenhandel (wyld) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark wyld — Earlier international word mark WILD CRISP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Rejection in part of the application for registration)
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, processed food product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2020019EN.01004801.xml










20.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 19/48






Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2019 — Wyld v EUIPO — Kaufland Warenhandel (wyld)
(Case T-711/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark wyld - Earlier international word mark WILD CRISP - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Rejection in part of the application for registration)
(2020/C 19/57)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Wyld GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kaufland Warenhandel GmbH & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 September 2018 (Case R 2621/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings betweenKaufland Warenhandel and Wyld.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Wyld GmbH to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 35, 28.1.2019.
Case C-861/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.o 26 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 26 November 2019 — LJ v INSS (Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social)
Date: 2019-11-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: gender equality, maternity benefit, principle of proportionality, social security legislation, supplementary pension








C_2020054EN.01003301.xml










17.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/33






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.o 26 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 26 November 2019 — LJ v INSS (Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social)
(Case C-861/19)
(2020/C 54/36)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social n.o 26 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: LJ

Defendant: INSS (Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social)

Questions referred







1.


Can the maternity supplement provided for in Article 60 of the Ley General de la Seguridad Social (General Law on Social Security), the consolidated version of which was approved by Real Decreto Legislativo 8/2015 (Royal Legislative Decree 8/2015), be considered a positive measure or action designed to achieve substantive equality between women and men which is permissible under Article 157(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?










2.


If the answer to the first question is ‘yes’, is the time limit established by the sole final provision of Royal Legislative Decree 8/2015 that restricts the supplement to pensions arising from 1 January 2016 onwards contrary to the principle of proportionality which must be satisfied by all positive action?