do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-280/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Alain Flausch and Others v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice — Date from which the time for bringing proceedings starts to run)
Date: 2019-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to the courts, administrative unit, environmental impact, environmental protection, limitation of legal proceedings, municipality, participatory democracy, regional authority








C_2020010EN.01001101.xml










13.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/11






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Alain Flausch and Others v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias and Others
(Case C-280/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment - Public participation in decision-making and access to justice - Date from which the time for bringing proceedings starts to run)
(2020/C 10/12)
Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Alain Flausch, Andrea Bosco, Estienne Roger Jean Pierre Albrespy, Somateio ‘Syndesmos Iiton’, Somateio ‘Elliniko Diktyo — Filoi tis Fysis’, Somateio ‘Syllogos Prostasias kai Perithalpsis Agrias Zois — SPPAZ’

Defendants: Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias, Ypourgos Oikonomikon, Ypourgos Tourismou, Ypourgos Naftilias kai Nisiotikis Politikis

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 6 of Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from carrying out the procedures for public participation in decision-making that relate to a project at the level of the headquarters of the competent regional administrative authority, and not at the level of the municipal unit within which the site of the project falls, where the specific arrangements implemented do not ensure that the rights of the public concerned are actually complied with, a matter which is for the national court to establish.










2.


Articles 9 and 11 of Directive 2011/92 must be interpreted as precluding legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which results in a period for bringing proceedings that starts to run from the announcement of consent for a project on the internet being relied on against members of the public concerned where they did not previously have an adequate opportunity to find out about the consent procedure in accordance with Article 6(2) of that directive.






(1)  OJ C 231 du 2.7.2018
Case C-682/16: Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Danemark) — BEI ApS v Skatteministeriet
Date: 2019-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: corporation tax, credit, double taxation, group of companies, interest, parent company, subsidiary, tax exemption, tax offence








C_2020137EN.01004201.xml










27.4.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 137/42






Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Danemark) — BEI ApS v Skatteministeriet
(Case C-682/16) (1)

(2020/C 137/58)
Language of the case: Danish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.
Case T-568/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2019 — Local-e-motion v EUIPO — Volkswagen (WE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark WE — Earlier national word mark WE — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2019-11-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet site, consultancy, forum, press agency, registered trade mark, telecommunications, trade-mark law, virtual community








C_2019432EN.01004802.xml










23.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/48






Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2019 — Local-e-motion v EUIPO — Volkswagen (WE)
(Case T-568/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark WE - Earlier national word mark WE - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 432/56)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Local-e-motion GmbH (Dorsten, Germany) (represented by: D. Sprenger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek, M. Fischer and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Volkswagen AG (Wolfsburg, Germany) (represented by: F. Thiering and L. Steidle, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2018 (Case R 128/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Volkswagen and Local-e-motion.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



dismisses the action;











2.



orders Local-e-motion to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.
Case T-48/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2019 –ADDE v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — European Parliament — Decision declaring certain expenditure of a political party ineligible for the purposes of a grant for 2015 — Decision awarding a grant for 2017 and making provision for pre-financing at the rate of 33 % of the maximum grant amount and an obligation to provide a bank guarantee — Obligation of impartiality — Rights of the defence — Financial Regulation — Rules of application of the Financial Regulation — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 — Proportionality — Equal treatment)
Date: 2019-11-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European party, distribution of EU funding, equal treatment, party financing, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence








C_2019432EN.01003401.xml










23.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/34






Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2019 –ADDE v Parliament
(Case T-48/17) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - European Parliament - Decision declaring certain expenditure of a political party ineligible for the purposes of a grant for 2015 - Decision awarding a grant for 2017 and making provision for pre-financing at the rate of 33 % of the maximum grant amount and an obligation to provide a bank guarantee - Obligation of impartiality - Rights of the defence - Financial Regulation - Rules of application of the Financial Regulation - Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 - Proportionality - Equal treatment)
(2019/C 432/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe ASBL (ADDE) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially by L. Defalque and L. Ruessmann, subsequently by M. Modrikanen and finally by Y. Rimokh, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decision of the Parliament of 21 November 2016 declaring certain expenditure ineligible for the purposes of a grant for 2015 and, second, of Parliament Decision FINS-2017-13 of 12 December 2016 concerning the award of a grant to the applicant for 2017, in so far as that decision limits the pre-financing to 33 % of the maximum grant amount, subject to the provision of a bank guarantee.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Annuls the decision of the Parliament of 21 November 2016 declaring certain expenditure ineligible for a grant in respect of financial year 2015;











2.



Dismisses the application for annulment of Parliament Decision FINS-2017-13 of 12 December 2016 concerning the award of a grant to the applicant for the financial year 2017;











3.



Orders Alliance for Direct Democracy in Europe ASBL and the European Parliament to bear their own costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.







(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.