Case C-804/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — BU v Markt24 GmbH
Date: 2019-10-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: jurisdiction, labour dispute, posted worker, remuneration of work, residence, termination of employment, work contract








C_2020045EN.01002101.xml










10.2.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/21






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2019 — BU v Markt24 GmbH
(Case C-804/19)
(2020/C 45/18)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesgericht Salzburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: BU

Defendant: Markt24 GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) applicable to an employment relationship in which, although an employment contract was entered into in Austria for the performance of work in Germany, the female employee, who remained in Austria and was prepared for several months to work, did not perform any work?






 



In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative















2.


Is Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that it is possible to apply a national provision which enables an employee to bring an action in the place where she was resident during the employment relationship or at the time when the employment relationship ended (thus facilitating the process of bringing an action), as is the case with Paragraph 4(1)(a) of the Arbeits- und Sozialgerichtsgesetz (Law on the labour and social courts; ‘the ASGG’)?










3.


Is Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that it is possible to apply a national provision which enables an employee to bring an action in the place where the remuneration is to be paid or was to be paid upon termination of his employment relationship (thus facilitating the process of bringing an action), as is the case with Paragraph 4(1)(d) of the ASGG?










4.


In the event that Questions 2 and 3 are answered in the negative:






4.1.


Is Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of an employment relationship in which the female employee has not performed any work, the action must be brought in the Member State in which the employee remained prepared to work?










4.2.


Is Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of an employment relationship in which the female employee has not performed any work, the action must be brought in the Member State in which the employment contract was initiated and entered into, even if the performance of work in another Member State had been agreed or envisaged in that employment contract?






 



In the event that the first question is answered in the negative



















5.


Is Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 applicable to an employment relationship in which, although an employment contract was entered into in Austria for the performance of work in Germany, the female employee, who remained in Austria and was prepared for several months to work, did not perform any work, if it is possible to apply a national provision which enables an employee to bring an action in the place where she was resident during the employment relationship or at the time when the employment relationship ended (thus facilitating the process of bringing an action), as is the case with Paragraph 4(1)(a) of the ASGG, or if it is possible to apply a national provision which enables an employee to bring an action in the place where the remuneration is to be paid or was to be paid upon termination of the employment relationship (thus facilitating the process of bringing an action), as is the case with Paragraph 4(1)(d) of the ASGG?






(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).