do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019287EN.01000101.xml










26.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

23 August 2019
(2019/C 287/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1065 




JPY


Japanese yen


117,79 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4559 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90453 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7165 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0893 




ISK


Iceland króna


138,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9593 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,769 




HUF


Hungarian forint


328,58 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3550 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7212 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,3815 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6396 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4741 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6776 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7360 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5360 




KRW


South Korean won


1 341,19 




ZAR


South African rand


16,8439 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8439 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3940 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 726,13 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6362 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,008 




RUB


Russian rouble


72,9469 




THB


Thai baht


33,997 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,5224 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,0041 




INR


Indian rupee


79,3040 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-345/19: Order of the President of the Court of 26 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EUflight.de GmbH v Eurowings GmbH
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, indemnification, traveller








C_2020019EN.01004003.xml










20.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 19/40






Order of the President of the Court of 26 August 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EUflight.de GmbH v Eurowings GmbH
(Case C-345/19) (1)

(2020/C 19/47)
Language of the case: Germany
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.
Case T-586/19: Action brought on 26 August 2019 — PL v Commission
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, promotion, rights of the defence, staff assessment








C_2019363EN.01002301.xml










28.10.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 363/23






Action brought on 26 August 2019 — PL v Commission
(Case T-586/19)
(2019/C 363/31)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: PL (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Commission’s decision of 12 December 2018 establishing the applicant’s 2017 CDR;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action against the Commission’s decision establishing the applicant’s career development report in respect of 2017 (2017 CDR), the latter relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 22a and 22b of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (the Staff Regulations) and infringement by the DG of DG HR of his duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union which confers on the applicant the right to good administration and, in particular, the right to have his affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the general implementing provisions for Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, breach of the duty to state reasons and failure to observe the rights of the defence.
Case T-587/19: Action brought on 26 August 2019 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién)
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, agricultural product, distributor, export, horticulture, import, packaging, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law








C_2019363EN.01002401.xml










28.10.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 363/24






Action brought on 26 August 2019 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién)
(Case T-587/19)
(2019/C 363/32)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Frutas Tono, SL (Benifairo de la Valldigna, Spain) (represented by: A. Cañizares Doménech, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Agrocazalla, SL (Lorca, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for the European Union figurative mark Marién — Application for registration No 15 146 021

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 June 2019 in Case R 171/2018-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and, accordingly, set aside the costs order made against the applicant before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal and, instead, make a further order granting suspension of the appeal proceedings before EUIPO until such time as that Office gives a decision on the declaration of invalidity sought in respect of the opposing mark; or, in the alternative,










—


if, when judgment is given by the Court, the opposing mark has already been declared invalid by EUIPO, annul, in addition, the decision of the Board of Appeal, on the ground that it failed duly to analyse the effect on the compatibility of registration of the signs at issue, when it ought to have stayed the proceedings of its own motion; or, in the alternative,










—


in the event that the Court does not find as above, declare that there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue, for all of the reasons argued previously; and










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Priority right of the proprietor of the contested mark over the Spanish national marks 1798380 MARIEN, applied for on 12 January 1994 for Class 39; 1800302 MARIEN, applied for on 25 January 1994 for Class 35; and 2222325 MARIEN, applied for on 23 March 1999 for Class 31;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9367 — Mirova/Predica/Indigo) (Text with EEA relevance) 2019/C 389/06
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, insurance, investment company, merger control, parking area








C_2019389EN.01001101.xml










18.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 389/11






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9367 — Mirova/Predica/Indigo)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 389/06)
On 26 August 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9367. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-635/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (Spain) lodged on 26 August 2019 — Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi v Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: collective agreement, pay, pay policy, public procurement, tendering








C_2019406EN.01001001.xml










2.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 406/10






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (Spain) lodged on 26 August 2019 — Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi v Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga
(Case C-635/19)
(2019/C 406/15)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi

Defendant: Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga

Question referred

Does Directive 2014/24/EU (1) preclude national legislation, such as Article 122(2) of the LCSP, (2) which compels contracting authorities to include in the procurement documents governing a public contract a special condition of performance imposing on the successful tenderer an obligation to guarantee that the pay conditions applicable to workers under the relevant sectoral collective agreement will at least be honoured, even if that sectoral collective agreement is not binding on the undertaking to which the contract is awarded under the rules governing collective bargaining and collective agreements, which establish the primacy of the company agreement on pay and provide for the possibility of not applying a collective agreement in force for economic, technical, organisational or production reasons?


(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

(2)  Law 9/2017 of 8 November 2017 on Public Sector Contracts.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9436 — ICG/Predica/OCEA Group) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, building services, economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, merger control, subsidised housing








C_2019311EN.01000102.xml










16.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9436 — ICG/Predica/OCEA Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 311/02)
On 26 August 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9436. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-636/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 26 August 2019 — Y v CAK
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: direct applicability, freedom to provide services, health care, health expenditure, health insurance, residence, social-security harmonisation








C_2019383EN.01004602.xml










11.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 383/46






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands) lodged on 26 August 2019 — Y v CAK
(Case C-636/19)
(2019/C 383/56)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Y

Defendant: CAK

Questions referred







1.


Must Directive 2011/24/EU (1) be interpreted as meaning that persons referred to in Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, (2) who receive benefits in their country of residence at the expense of the Netherlands but who are not insured in the Netherlands under the statutory health insurance scheme can rely directly on that directive for the reimbursement of costs of care provided?
If not,










2.


Does it follow from Article 56 TFEU that, in a case such as the present one, not granting reimbursement for care provided in a Member State other than the country of residence or the country providing the pension is an unjustified obstacle to the free movement of services?






(1)  Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (OJ 2011 L 88, p. 45).

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).
Decision No 2/2019 of the Joint Committee under the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership of 26 August 2019 on the establishment of the list of individuals who are willing and able to serve as arbitrators [2019/1600]
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: European Union, Japan, Joint Committee
Subjects: Japan, arbitration, cooperation agreement (EU), economic cooperation, international arbitration








L_2019248EN.01009901.xml










27.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 248/99








            DECISION No 2/2019 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE UNDER THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND JAPAN FOR AN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP
         
of 26 August 2019
         
on the establishment of the list of individuals who are willing and able to serve as arbitrators [2019/1600]


THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership (the EU-Japan EPA), signed in Tokyo on 17 July 2018, and in particular paragraph 1 of Article 21.9 and Article 22.2 thereof,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The list of individuals who are willing and able to serve as arbitrators is established as set out in the Annex.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.





Cecilia MALMSTRÖM
            

European Commissioner for Trade



Taro KONO
            

Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan








ANNEX

LIST OF ARBITRATORS REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE 21.9 OF THE EU-JAPAN EPA


Sub-list for the European Union









1.


Laurence BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES












2.


Pieter Jan KUIJPER












3.


Hélène RUIZ FABRI












4.


Giorgio SACERDOTI





Sub-list for Japan









1.


Ichiro ARAKI












2.


Kozo KAWAI












3.


Shotaro OSHIMA












4.


Hironobu SAKAI












5.


Akio SHIMIZU





Sub-list of individuals who are not nationals of either Party and who shall act as chairperson of the panel









1.


William DAVEY (United States)












2.


Armand DE MESTRAL (Canada)












3.


Christian HÄBERLI (Switzerland)












4.


Jennifer A. HILLMAN (United States)












5.


Merit JANOW (United States)












6.


David UNTERHALTER (South Africa)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1375 of 26 August 2019 amending for the 305th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: European Commission, Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, terrorism








L_2019223EN.01000701.xml










27.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 223/7








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/1375
of 26 August 2019
         
amending for the 305th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations (1), and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and Article 7a(5) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.












(2)


On 20 August 2019, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend one entry in the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.












(3)


Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 26 August 2019.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,


Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments






(1)  
            OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.




ANNEX
Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:
The identifying data for the following entry under the heading ‘Natural persons’ are amended as follows:

         ‘BAH AG MOUSSA (Good quality alias: a) Ag Mossa b) Ammi Salim). Nationality: Malian. Date of designation referred to in Article 7d(2)(i): 14.8.2019.’ is replaced by the following:


            ‘BAH AG MOUSSA (Good quality alias: a) Ag Mossa b) Ammi Salim). Date of birth: a) 1.1.1958, b) 31.12.1952, c) 28.10.1956. Nationality: Malian. Date of designation referred to in Article 7d(2)(i): 14.8.2019.’
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9518 — CPPIB/EQT/BNVC Group Holdings) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-08-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, health care system, holding company, investment company, merger control








C_2019287EN.01001201.xml










26.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/12






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9518 — CPPIB/EQT/BNVC Group Holdings)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 287/06)

1.   
On 20 August 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


EQT Fund Management S.à r.l. (‘EQT’, Luxembourg),










—


Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (‘CPPIB’, Canada),










—


BNVC Group Holdings, Inc. (‘BNVC Group Holdings’, United States).




EQT and CPPIB acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of BNVC Group Holdings.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for undertaking EQT: investment fund,
—   for undertaking CPPIB: investment management,
—   for undertaking BNVC Group Holdings: holding company of Waystar, a provider of revenue cycle management solutions for healthcare systems and providers in the United States.


3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9518 — CPPIB/EQT/BNVC Group Holdings
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.