do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-08-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019283EN.01000201.xml










21.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 283/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

20 August 2019
(2019/C 283/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1076 




JPY


Japanese yen


117,79 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4560 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,91623 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7653 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0860 




ISK


Iceland króna


138,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9638 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,796 




HUF


Hungarian forint


327,23 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3552 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7305 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,3328 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6347 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4762 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6868 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7286 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5351 




KRW


South Korean won


1 337,78 




ZAR


South African rand


17,0117 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8180 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3838 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 794,38 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6263 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,964 




RUB


Russian rouble


73,8360 




THB


Thai baht


34,086 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,4959 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,9445 




INR


Indian rupee


79,4410 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9423 – Strategic value Partners/Pfleiderer) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 200/03
Date: 2019-08-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building materials, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, wood industry








C_2020200EN.01000701.xml










15.6.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/7






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9423 – Strategic value Partners/Pfleiderer)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 200/03)
On 21 August 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9423. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-623/19P: Appeal brought on 21 August 2019 by Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. against the judgment delivered on 28 June 2019 in Case T-64/18 Alfamicro v Commission
Date: 2019-08-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU aid, Framework Programme for Research and Development, abuse of power, debt, financial aid, financial audit








C_2019348EN.01001301.xml










14.10.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 348/13






Appeal brought on 21 August 2019 by Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. against the judgment delivered on 28 June 2019 in Case T-64/18 Alfamicro v Commission
(Case C-623/19P)
(2019/C 348/14)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Appellant: Alfamicro — Sistemas de computadores, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. (represented by: G. Gentil Anastácio and D. Pirra Xarepe, advogados, and M. Stock da Cunha, advogada estagiária)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Set aside the judgment of the General Court in Case T-64/18, (1)











—


Annul Commission Decision C (2017) 8839 final, of 13 December 2017,










—


Order the European Commission to pay all of the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submits that the event giving rise to a contractual debt is the contract itself. Consequently, if the Commission, in the declarative action, can make its claims, but does not do so, it cannot, following the judgment, issue enforcement instruments for the amount of the overdraft.
The Commission misused its powers.
In the declarative judgment (T-831/14), (2) the General Court ruled on the Commission’s claim arising out of the grant agreement, and not on the ineligible costs relating to the period covered by the audit, as it erroneously does now.
The operative part of the judgment handed down in the declarative action (T-831/14) does not lay down any limitation, either in relation to the debt, the period or the costs.
A single enforcement instrument corresponds to a single obligation, being the debt under the grant agreement.
It does not make any sense for the General Court to determine definitively a debt and then for the creditor ultimately to claim that not all of the amounts were calculated.
The applicant submits that, from the moment there is a declarative action to determine a contractual debt owed to the European Union, it is forbidden for the Commission to issue enforcement instruments without taking the General Court’s judgment as its reference.
If the declarative action concerns the contractual debt owed by the debtor to the Commission, the jurisdiction of the General Court to determine the debt precludes the Commission’s power to issue enforcement instruments which override the judgment.


(1)  EU:T:2019:453

(2)  See Case C-14/18 P
Case C-622/19 P: Appeal brought on 21 August 2019 by Luz Saúde, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 June 2019 in Case T-357/18 Luz Saúde v EUIPO – Clínica La Luz
Date: 2019-08-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, furniture industry, hairdressing and beauty care, health care, medical centre, medical institution, public hygiene, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019432EN.01002001.xml










23.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/20






Appeal brought on 21 August 2019 by Luz Saúde, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 June 2019 in Case T-357/18 Luz Saúde v EUIPO – Clínica La Luz
(Case C-622/19 P)
(2019/C 432/25)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Appellant: Luz Saúde, SA (represented by: G. Gentil Anastácio, P. Guerra e Andrade, G. Moreira Rato and M. Stock da Cunha, advogados)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office and Clínica La Luz
By order of 5 November 2019, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) ruled that the appeal should not be allowed to proceed and ordered Luz Saúde, SA, to bear its own costs.