do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-08-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019262EN.01000201.xml










5.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

2 August 2019
(2019/C 262/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1106 




JPY


Japanese yen


118,57 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4660 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,91505 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7223 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0931 




ISK


Iceland króna


136,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9105 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,763 




HUF


Hungarian forint


326,96 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3014 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7345 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,2221 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6365 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4698 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,6924 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7026 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5290 




KRW


South Korean won


1 333,44 




ZAR


South African rand


16,3271 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7058 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3815 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 772,45 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6173 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,307 




RUB


Russian rouble


72,5055 




THB


Thai baht


34,157 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2958 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,4542 




INR


Indian rupee


77,3400 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-545/19: Action brought on 5 August 2019 — Global Steel Wire and Others v Commission
Date: 2019-08-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: financial situation, financial solvency, payment, principle of proportionality, sanction (EU), steel








C_2019319EN.01003001.xml










23.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/30






Action brought on 5 August 2019 — Global Steel Wire and Others v Commission
(Case T-545/19)
(2019/C 319/31)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Global Steel Wire, SA (Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain), Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (Gijón, Spain), Global Special Steel Products, SA (Corrales de Buelna, Spain) (represented by: F. González Díaz, J. Blanco Carol and B. Martos Stevenson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


declare the present action admissible;










—


annul the European Commission’s decision of 24 May 2019; and










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action, which dates back to a request for inability to pay submitted in February 2000 in the context of proceedings in Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing steel, is brought against the European Commission’s decision rejecting the request of 20 December 2018 to defer payment in the light of the applicants’ financial situation.
In support of their action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence, in that the contested decision was adopted without the applicants being given the opportunity to set out their point of view in that regard.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging failure to state reasons for the rejection of the request submitted by the applicants.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the Commission erred in fact and in law when assessing the applicants’ financial situation and their ability to pay the fine.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission adopted the contested decision in breach of the general principle of collegiality, thereby vitiating that decision by a lack of competence.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality.
Designation of a Judge to replace a Judge who is prevented from acting
Date: 2019-08-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: General Court (EU), appointment of members, judge, president of an institution, rules of procedure, vice-president of an institution








C_2019263EN.01000201.xml










5.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/2






Designation of a Judge to replace a Judge who is prevented from acting
(2019/C 263/02)






1.


On 10 July 2019, the General Court decided that, as of 27 September 2019, in those cases in which a Judge is prevented from acting, referred to in the second sentence of Article 17(2) and the second sentence of Article 24(2), respectively, of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the President of the General Court shall replace the Judge prevented from acting.










2.


If the President of the General Court is prevented from acting, he shall designate the Vice-President of the General Court to replace him, in accordance with Article 11(1) of the Rules of Procedure.










3.


If the Vice-President of the General Court is prevented from acting, the President of the General Court shall designate the Judge to replace him according to the order of precedence laid down in Article 8 of the Rules of Procedure, with the exception of the Presidents of Chambers.










4.


If the Judge designated in accordance with paragraph 3 is prevented from acting, and the case in which the Judge is prevented from acting is a civil service case, as defined in the decision of the General Court of 3 July 2019 on the criteria for the assignment of cases to Chambers (OJ 2019 C 246, p. 2), or a case concerning intellectual property rights referred to in Title IV of the Rules of Procedure, the President of the General Court shall designate, following the order of precedence laid down in Article 8 of the Rules of Procedure, a Judge assigned to a Chamber examining the same type of cases as the Chamber to which the Judge prevented from acting belongs in order to replace him.










5.


In order to ensure a balanced distribution of the caseload, the President of the General Court shall be able to deviate from the order of precedence laid down in Article 8 of the Rules of Procedure, as referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the present decision.
Case C-593/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Außenstelle Graz) (Austria) lodged on 5 August 2019 — SK Telecom Co. Ltd.
Date: 2019-08-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, provision of services, roaming








C_2020027EN.01001101.xml










27.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/11






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Außenstelle Graz) (Austria) lodged on 5 August 2019 — SK Telecom Co. Ltd.
(Case C-593/19)
(2020/C 27/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht (Außenstelle Graz)

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: SK Telecom Co. Ltd.

Respondent: Finanzamt Graz-Stadt

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 59a(b) of Directive 2006/112/EC, (1) as amended by Article 2 of Directive 2008/8/EC, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the use of roaming services in a Member State in the form of access to the national mobile telephone network for the purpose of establishing incoming and outgoing connections by a ‘non-taxable end customer’ temporarily resident in that Member State constitutes ‘use and enjoyment’ in that Member State which justifies the transfer of the place of supply from the third country to that Member State, even though neither the mobile telephone operator providing the services nor the end customer are established in Community territory and the end customer does not have his permanent address and does not usually reside in the Community?










2.


Is Article 59a(b) of Directive 2006/112, as amended by Article 2 of Directive 2008/8, to be interpreted as meaning that the place of supply of telecommunications services as described in Question 1, which are outside the Community according to Article 59 of Directive 2006/112, as amended by Article 2 of Directive 2008/8, may be transferred to the territory of a Member State even though neither the mobile telephone operator providing the services nor the end customer are established in Community territory and the end customer does not have his permanent address and does not usually reside in the Community, simply because the telecommunications services in the third country are not subject to a tax comparable to VAT under EU law?






(1)  Council Directive of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

(2)  Council Directive of 12 February 2008 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the place of supply of services (OJ 2008 L 44, p. 11).
European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1330 of 5 August 2019 appointing the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
Date: 2019-08-05
Institutions: European Council
Subjects: High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, appointment of members








L_2019207EN.01003601.xml










7.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 207/36








            EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/1330
of 5 August 2019
         
appointing the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy


THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 18(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


European Council Decision 2014/639/EU (1) appointed the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy until 31 October 2019.












(2)


The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy should be appointed for the period from the end of the current term of office of the Commission until 31 October 2024.












(3)


By letter of 26 July 2019, the President-elect has agreed to the appointment of Mr Josep BORRELL FONTELLES as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.












(4)


In accordance with the third subparagraph of Article 17(7) of the Treaty on European Union, the President, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the other members of the Commission are subject as a body to a vote of consent by the European Parliament,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Josep BORRELL FONTELLES is hereby appointed High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the period from the end of the current term of office of the Commission until 31 October 2024.


Article 2
This Decision shall be notified to Mr Josep BORRELL FONTELLES by the President of the European Council.
It shall take effect on the day of its notification.


Article 3
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 5 August 2019.


For the European Council


The President

D. TUSK
            





(1)  European Council Decision 2014/639/EU of 30 August 2014 appointing the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (OJ L 262, 2.9.2014, p. 6).