Case C-40/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data — Directive 95/46/EC — Article 2(d) — Notion of ‘controller’ — Operator of a website who has embedded on that website a social plugin that allows the personal data of a visitor to that website to be transferred to the provider of that plugin — Article 7(f) — Lawfulness of data processing — Taking into account of the interest of the operator of the website or of that of the provider of the social plugin — Articles 2(h) and 7(a) — Consent of the data subject — Article 10 — Informing the data subject — National legislation allowing consumer-protection associations to bring or defend legal proceedings)
Date: 2019-07-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, data protection, natural person, non-profit organisation, personal data, protection of privacy








C_2019319EN.01000201.xml










23.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/2






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV
(Case C-40/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data - Directive 95/46/EC - Article 2(d) - Notion of ‘controller’ - Operator of a website who has embedded on that website a social plugin that allows the personal data of a visitor to that website to be transferred to the provider of that plugin - Article 7(f) - Lawfulness of data processing - Taking into account of the interest of the operator of the website or of that of the provider of the social plugin - Articles 2(h) and 7(a) - Consent of the data subject - Article 10 - Informing the data subject - National legislation allowing consumer-protection associations to bring or defend legal proceedings)
(2019/C 319/02)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV

Interveners: Facebook Ireland Ltd, Landesbeauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit Nordrhein-Westfalen

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Articles 22 to 24 of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which allows consumer-protection associations to bring or defend legal proceedings against a person allegedly responsible for an infringement of the protection of personal data.










2.


The operator of a website, such as Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG, that embeds on that website a social plugin causing the browser of a visitor to that website to request content from the provider of that plugin and, to that end, to transmit to that provider personal data of the visitor can be considered to be a controller, within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Directive 95/46. That liability is, however, limited to the operation or set of operations involving the processing of personal data in respect of which it actually determines the purposes and means, that is to say, the collection and disclosure by transmission of the data at issue.










3.


In a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which the operator of a website embeds on that website a social plugin causing the browser of a visitor to that website to request content from the provider of that plugin and, to that end, to transmit to that provider personal data of the visitor, it is necessary that that operator and that provider each pursue a legitimate interest, within the meaning of Article 7(f) of Directive 95/46, through those processing operations in order for those operations to be justified in respect of each of them.










4.


Articles 2(h) and 7(a) of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which the operator of a website embeds on that website a social plugin causing the browser of a visitor to that website to request content from the provider of that plugin and, to that end, to transmit to that provider personal data of the visitor, the consent referred to in those provisions must be obtained by that operator only with regard to the operation or set of operations involving the processing of personal data in respect of which that operator determines the purposes and means. In addition, Article 10 of that directive must be interpreted as meaning that, in such a situation, the duty to inform laid down in that provision is incumbent also on that operator, but the information that the latter must provide to the data subject need relate only to the operation or set of operations involving the processing of personal data in respect of which that operator actually determines the purposes and means.






(1)  OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.