do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1321 of 23 July 2019 approving an amendment to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication ‘Contea di Sclafani’ (PDO)
Date: 2019-07-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Sicily, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, white wine








L_2019206EN.01000901.xml










6.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 206/9








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/1321
of 23 July 2019
         
approving an amendment to the specification for a Protected Designation of Origin or a Protected Geographical Indication ‘Contea di Sclafani’ (PDO)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Commission has examined the application for the approval of an amendment to the specification for the Protected Designation of Origin ‘Contea di Sclafani’, sent by Italy in accordance with Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. The changes include a change of name from ‘Contea di Sclafani’ to ‘Contea di Sclafani’/‘Valledolmo — Contea di Sclafani’.












(2)


The Commission has published the application for the approval of an amendment to the specification in the Official Journal of the European Union, as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 (2).












(3)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(4)


The amendment to the specification should therefore be approved in accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendment to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Contea di Sclafani’ (PDO) is hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 23 July 2019.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 76, 1.3.2019, p. 3.
Case C-558/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Cluj (Romania) lodged on 23 July 2019 — Impresa Pizzarotti & C SPA Italia Sucursala Cluj v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili
Date: 2019-07-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: branch, electronic money, financial transaction, nationality of legal persons, parent company, revenue, right of establishment, transfer pricing








C_2019372EN.01001402.xml










4.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 372/14






Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Cluj (Romania) lodged on 23 July 2019 — Impresa Pizzarotti & C SPA Italia Sucursala Cluj v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili
(Case C-558/19)
(2019/C 372/15)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Impresa Pizzarotti & C SPA Italia Sucursala Cluj

Defendant: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Question referred

Do Articles 49 and 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union preclude national legislation such as that at issue in the present case (Articles 11(2) and 29(3) of Legea nr. 571/2003 privind Codul fiscal (Law No 571/2003 establishing the Romanian Tax Code)), which provides that a bank transfer of money from a company branch resident in one Member State to the parent company resident in another Member State may be reclassified as a revenue-generating transaction, with the consequent obligation to apply the rules on transfer pricing, whereas, if the same transaction had been effected between a company branch and a parent company, both of which were resident in the same Member State, that transaction could not have been reclassified in the same way and the rules on transfer pricing would not have been applied?
Case C-560/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 3 de Valencia (Spain) lodged on 23 July 2019 — GT v Air Nostrum Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, S.A.
Date: 2019-07-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, ticket, traveller








C_2019372EN.01001501.xml










4.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 372/15






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 3 de Valencia (Spain) lodged on 23 July 2019 — GT v Air Nostrum Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, S.A.
(Case C-560/19)
(2019/C 372/16)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil n.o 3 de Valencia

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: GT

Defendant: Air Nostrum Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo, S.A.

Questions referred







1.


Can a company which provides air passenger transport and which sells the ticket but which does not actually operate the flight be considered to come within the concept of ‘operating air carrier’?










2.


If the answer to the previous question is in the negative, does the right to compensation for passengers under Article 7 of Regulation [(EC) No] 261/2004 (1) exist where the flight is composed of more than one leg and, as a result of a short delay (less than three hours) on one leg, there is a long delay (more than three hours) on arrival at the final destination because of a missed connection? If the answer is in the affirmative, where the different legs are operated by different carriers, is the obligation to pay compensation under Article 7 of Regulation [(EC) No] 261/2004 incumbent on the operating carrier on whose leg there was a short delay (less than three hours) which, however, caused the missed connection and, therefore, a long delay (more than three hours) on arrival at the final destination?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9431 — KKR/Grupo Gallardo Balboa) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-07-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, iron and steel industry, merger control








C_2019247EN.01003201.xml










23.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 247/32






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9431 — KKR/Grupo Gallardo Balboa)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 247/11)

1.   
On 12 July 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


KKR & Co. Inc. (‘KKR’, USA), and










—


Grupo Gallardo Balboa S.L.U. (‘Grupo Gallardo Balboa’, Spain).




KKR acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Grupo Gallardo Balboa.
The concentration is accomplished by way of acquisition of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


KKR is a global investment firm, which offers a broad range of alternative asset management services to public and private market investors and provides capital markets solutions for the firm, its portfolio companies and other clients,










—


Grupo Gallardo Balboa is a holding company, headquartered in Spain, for various steelmaking corporations that manufacture corrugated steel. Through its operating companies, it has factories throughout Spanish communities including Extremadura, Madrid, Asturias and País Vasco.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9431 — KKR/Grupo Gallardo Balboa
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9389 — Porsche Holding Salzburg/SIVA/Soauto) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-07-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: distributor, economic concentration, maintenance, merger control, motor vehicle industry, retail trade, vehicle parts, wholesale trade








C_2019314EN.01000101.xml










18.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9389 — Porsche Holding Salzburg/SIVA/Soauto)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 314/01)
On 23 July 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9389. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-595/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 23 July 2019 — Fototre Srl v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Others
Date: 2019-07-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: electrical energy, energy law, energy production, national law, ownership, principle of legal certainty, public sector, renewable energy, solar energy








C_2019357EN.01002301.xml










21.10.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 23 July 2019 — Fototre Srl v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Others
(Case C-595/19)
(2019/C 357/28)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Fototre Srl

Defendants: Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA

Questions referred

Does EU law preclude the application of a provision of national law, such as that in Article 26(2) and (3) of Decree-Law No 91/2014, as converted by Law No 116/2014, which significantly reduces or delays the payment of incentives already granted by law and defined on the basis of corresponding agreements concluded by undertakings generating electrical energy by means of photovoltaic conversion with Gestore dei servizi energetici s.p.a, a public company responsible for that process?
In particular, is that provision of national law compatible with the general principles of EU law relating to legitimate expectation, legal certainty, sincere cooperation and effectiveness, with Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, with Directive 2009/28/EC (1) and with the rules governing support schemes laid down in that directive, and with Article 216(2) TFEU, in particular in relation to the European Energy Charter Treaty?


(1)  Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ 2009 L 140, p. 16).