do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-434/17: Order of the General Court of 22 July 2019 — Younique v EUIPO — Jafer Enterprises R&D (younique products) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-07-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019357EN.01003401.xml










21.10.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/34






Order of the General Court of 22 July 2019 — Younique v EUIPO — Jafer Enterprises R&D (younique products)
(Case T-434/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 357/42)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Younique LLC (Alpine, Utah, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. García Murillo and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Jafer Enterprises R&D, SLU (Granollers, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2017 (Case R 1564/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Jafer Enterprises R&D and Younique.

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.











2.



Younique LLC shall bear its own costs and the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).











3.



Jafer Enterprises R&D, SLU shall bear its own costs.







(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.
Case T-519/19: Action brought on 22 July 2019 — Forte v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, pension scheme, primacy of EU law, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2019305EN.01006601.xml










9.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/66






Action brought on 22 July 2019 — Forte v Parliament
(Case T-519/19)
(2019/C 305/76)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Mario Forte (Naples, Italy) (represented by: C. Forte and G. Forte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Primarily, annul the contested act;










—


Primarily, annul every previous and subsequent preparatory act connected to the contested act which has legal effects in regard to the applicant;










—


Order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action has been brought against European Parliament Decision D (2019) 20777, signed by Mr Sune Hansen, Head of the Members’ Salaries and Social Entitlements Unit, Directorate for financial and social entitlements, Directorate-General for Finance of the European Parliament, revising retirement pension rights following the entry into force on 1 January 2019 of Resolution No 14/2018 of the Office of the Italian Chamber of Deputies and ordering recovery of the amounts unduly paid out.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Cases T-345/19, Santini v Parliament; T-347/19, Falqui v Parliament and T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
The applicant claims, in particular, that the reasoning for the contested decision is illogical; that there was no evaluation of the lawfulness of Resolution No 14/2018 in relation to the general EU-law principles of reasonableness, proportionality, certainty, predictability, legitimate expectations and the protection of acquired rights; infringement of Article 6 TEU; infringement of the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament; infringement of the Financial Regulation; failure to observe the principles of equality and non-retroactivity of legal rules; and failure to observe the principle of access to protection and justice.
Winding-up proceedings — Decision to start winding-up proceedings in respect of Stronghold Insurance Company Limited
Date: 2019-07-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, insurance company, judicial proceedings, liquidation








C_2019245EN.01000301.xml










22.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/3






Winding-up proceedings
Decision to start winding-up proceedings in respect of Stronghold Insurance Company Limited
(2019/C 245/04)
Publication made in accordance with:






(1)


Article 280 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II); and










(2)


The Insurers (Reorganisation and Winding Up) Regulations 2004 SI No 2004/353, Regulation 11










Insurance undertaking







Stronghold Insurance Company Limited




46 Rose Lane




Norwich




NR1 1PN




UNITED KINGDOM








Date, entry into force and nature of decision


27 June 2019




Competent authorities







Prudential Regulatory Authority




c/o Bank of England




Threadneedle Street




London




EC2R 8AH




UNITED KINGDOM









Financial Conduct Authority




12 Endeavour Square




London




E20 1JN




UNITED KINGDOM








Supervisory authority







Prudential Regulatory Authority




c/o Bank of England




Threadneedle Street




London




EC2R 8AH




UNITED KINGDOM









Financial Conduct Authority




12 Endeavour Square




London




E20 1JN




UNITED KINGDOM








Administrator appointed







Dan Yoram Schwarzmann PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




7 More London Riverside




London




SE1 2RT




UNITED KINGDOM









Douglas Nigel Rackham




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




7 More London Riverside




London




SE1 2RT




UNITED KINGDOM








Applicable law


Insolvency Act 1986
England and Wales