do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1135 of 2 July 2019 electing the President of the European Council
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: European Council
Subjects: President of the European Council, appointment of members








LI2019179EN.01000101.xml










3.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


LI 179/1








            EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/1135
of 2 July 2019
         
electing the President of the European Council


THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15(5) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 30 November 2019, the term of office of the current President of the European Council, Mr Donald TUSK, will come to an end.












(2)


A new President of the European Council should therefore be elected,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Charles MICHEL is hereby elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 December 2019 until 31 May 2022.


Article 2
This Decision shall be notified to Mr Charles MICHEL by the Secretary-General of the Council.


Article 3
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 2 July 2019.


For the European Council


The President

D. TUSK
Case T-433/19: Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Speciale v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01005502.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/55






Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Speciale v Parliament
(Case T-433/19)
(2019/C 295/72)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Roberto Speciale (Bogliasco, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1173 of 2 July 2019 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Ayrshire New Potatoes’/‘Ayrshire Earlies’ (PGI))
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Scotland, United Kingdom, designation of origin, labelling, potato, product designation








L_2019184EN.01001101.xml










10.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 184/11








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2019/1173
of 2 July 2019
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Ayrshire New Potatoes’/‘Ayrshire Earlies’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Ayrshire New Potatoes’/‘Ayrshire Earlies’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Ayrshire New Potatoes’/‘Ayrshire Earlies’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Ayrshire New Potatoes’/‘Ayrshire Earlies’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 2 July 2019.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 94, 12.3.2019, p. 5.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case T-427/19: Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Frantova v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01005101.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/51






Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Frantova v Parliament
(Case T-427/19)
(2019/C 295/66)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Jitka Frantova (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-429/19: Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Iacono v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01005202.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/52






Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Iacono v Parliament
(Case T-429/19)
(2019/C 295/68)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Francesco Iacono (Forio, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-430/19: Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Bonsignore v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01005301.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/53






Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Bonsignore v Parliament
(Case T-430/19)
(2019/C 295/69)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Vito Bonsignore (Turin, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Brittany, France, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2019221EN.01001201.xml










2.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/12






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 221/05)






Member State


France




Route concerned


Brest (Guipavas) - l’île d’Ouessant




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligation


1 April 2012




Date of entry into force of the changes


1 April 2020




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Deliberation of the standing committee of the Regional Council of Brittany No 19-0401-05 of 6 May 2019 containing information on the public service obligation: compendium of administrative acts of the regional authorities No 513 (volume 1/2, p. 565 et seq.):
https://transfert.region-bretagne.fr/wwbxp2i4
Tender documents fully accessible from end of June 2019 at: https://megalisbretagne.org
For further information please contact:





Région Bretagne




Direction des infrastructures et de la mobilité




283 avenue du Général Patton




CS 21101




35711 Rennes Cedex




FRANCE




Tel. +33 299279785




Website: http://www.bretagne.bzh











Email


:


secretariat.transports@bretagne.bzh
fabrice.girard@bretagne.bzh
stephane.marsille@bretagne.bzh
Case T-421/19: Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Segre v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01004602.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/46






Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Segre v Parliament
(Case T-421/19)
(2019/C 295/60)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Sergio Camillo Segre (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-425/19: Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Ventre v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01004902.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/49






Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Ventre v Parliament
(Case T-425/19)
(2019/C 295/64)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Riccardo Ventre (Formicola, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-431/19: Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Azzolini v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01005401.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/54






Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Azzolini v Parliament
(Case T-431/19)
(2019/C 295/70)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Claudio Azzolini (Naples, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-426/19: Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Musoni v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01005001.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/50






Action brought on 2 July 2019 — Musoni v Parliament
(Case T-426/19)
(2019/C 295/65)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Mirella Musoni (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
European Council Decision (EU) 2019/1136 of 2 July 2019 proposing to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the European Commission
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: European Council
Subjects: European election, President of the Commission, announcement of candidacy








LI2019179EN.01000201.xml










3.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


LI 179/2








            EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2019/1136
of 2 July 2019
         
proposing to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the European Commission


THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 17(7) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Article 17(7) of the Treaty on European Union provides that, taking into account the elections to the European Parliament and after having held the appropriate consultations, the European Council proposes to the European Parliament a candidate for President of the European Commission.












(2)


The elections to the European Parliament were held between 23 and 26 May 2019, in accordance with Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2018/767 (1).












(3)


In accordance with Declaration No 11 annexed to the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference which adopted the Treaty of Lisbon, representatives of the European Parliament and of the European Council conducted the necessary consultations.












(4)


Therefore a candidate should be proposed to the European Parliament for President of the European Commission,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Ms Ursula VON DER LEYEN is hereby proposed to the European Parliament as candidate for President of the European Commission.


Article 2
This Decision shall be forwarded to the European Parliament.


Article 3
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 2 July 2019.


For the European Council


The President

D. TUSK
            





(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2018/767 of 22 May 2018 fixing the period for the ninth election of representatives to the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage (OJ L 129, 25.5.2018, p. 76).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9353 — Advent International Corporation/Evonik Methacrylates Business Division) (Text with EEA relevance) 2019/C 347/06
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_2019347EN.01000601.xml










14.10.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/6






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9353 — Advent International Corporation/Evonik Methacrylates Business Division)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 347/06)
On 2 July 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9353. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Special Report No 11/2019 — ‘The EU’s regulation for the modernisation of air traffic management has added value — but the funding was largely unnecessary’
Date: 2019-07-02
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: Eurocontrol, Single European Sky, air safety, air space, air traffic control, fund (EU), management








C_2019221EN.01001101.xml










2.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/11






Special Report No 11/2019
‘The EU’s regulation for the modernisation of air traffic management has added value — but the funding was largely unnecessary’
(2019/C 221/04)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 11/2019 ‘The EU’s regulation for the modernisation of air traffic management has added value — but the funding was largely unnecessary’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu