do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-443/19: Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Arroni v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01006301.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/63






Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Arroni v Parliament
(Case T-443/19)
(2019/C 295/82)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Aldo Arroni (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola and L. Florio, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019219EN.01000201.xml










1.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 219/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

28 June 2019
(2019/C 219/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1380 




JPY


Japanese yen


122,60 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4636 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89655 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5633 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1105 




ISK


Iceland króna


141,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6938 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,447 




HUF


Hungarian forint


323,39 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2496 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7343 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,5655 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6244 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4893 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8866 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6960 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5395 




KRW


South Korean won


1 315,35 




ZAR


South African rand


16,1218 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8185 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3973 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 083,35 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7082 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,335 




RUB


Russian rouble


71,5975 




THB


Thai baht


34,897 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,3511 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8201 




INR


Indian rupee


78,5240 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9384 — Sumitomo Corporation/Nippon Steel Corporation/Standard Steel Holdings) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, international trade, investment company, iron and steel industry, merger control, vehicle on rails








C_2019231EN.01000102.xml










9.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 231/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9384 — Sumitomo Corporation/Nippon Steel Corporation/Standard Steel Holdings)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 231/02)
On 1 July 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9384. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, alcoholic beverage, common customs tariff




C_2019219EN.01000401.xml










1.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 219/4






Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(2019/C 219/04)
Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 101, the Explanatory note to CN heading ‘2206 00 Other fermented beverages (for example, cider, perry, mead, saké); mixtures of fermented beverages and mixtures of fermented beverages and non-alcoholic beverages, not elsewhere specified or included’ is replaced by the following text:


‘Products obtained through fermentation remain classified under heading 2206 provided that they retain the character of products classified under that heading, namely that of fermented beverages. Products to which, for instance, distilled alcohol, water and other substances (such as syrup, various aromas and colourings, and, in some cases, a cream base) have been added, might have changed their characteristics. When those additions result in losing the taste, smell and/or appearance of a beverage produced from a particular fruit or natural product, that is to say a fermented beverage of heading 2206, those products are to be classified under heading 2208 (see, to that effect, for example the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-150/08 (*1) and in Joined Cases C-532/14 and C-533/14 (*2)).


On page 104, the Explanatory note to CN subheadings ‘2208 90 91 and 2208 90 99 Undenatured ethyl alcohol of an alcoholic strength by volume of less than 80 % vol, in containers holding’ is replaced by the following text:


‘Products which are obtained not exclusively through fermentation but also through a process of purification, which leads to those products losing the properties and characteristics of fermented beverages and acquiring those of ethyl alcohol, are classified under heading 2208 (see, to that effect, for example the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-196/10 (*3) as regards a liquid described as a “malt beer base” with an alcoholic strength by volume of 14 % and obtained from brewed beer which has been clarified and then subjected to ultrafiltration, by which the concentration of ingredients such as bitter substances and proteins has been reduced).
See also the explanatory note to heading 2206 00.



(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.
Case T-439/19: Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Mantovani v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01006001.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/60






Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Mantovani v Parliament
(Case T-439/19)
(2019/C 295/78)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Mario Mantovani (Arconate, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-446/19: Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Castellina v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01006501.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/65






Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Castellina v Parliament
(Case T-446/19)
(2019/C 295/85)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luciana Castellina (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-440/19: Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Mattina v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01006101.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/61






Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Mattina v Parliament
(Case T-440/19)
(2019/C 295/79)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Vincenzo Mattina (Buonabitacolo, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-444/19: Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Locatelli v Parliament
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019295EN.01006401.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/64






Action brought on 1 July 2019 — Locatelli v Parliament
(Case T-444/19)
(2019/C 295/83)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Pia Elda Locatelli (Chiuduno, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non-existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament re-determined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-389/19, Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Information on the date of entry into force of the Treaty establishing the Transport Community
Date: 2019-07-01
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Western Balkans, agreement (EU), common transport policy, inland waterway transport, land transport, maritime transport, trans-European network, transport network








L_2019176EN.01000101.xml










1.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 176/1







Information on the date of entry into force of the Treaty establishing the Transport Community

The Treaty establishing the Transport Community (1), signed by the European Union and six South East European partners between 12 July (Trieste) and 9 October 2017 (Brussels), has entered into force on 1 May 2019 in accordance with its Article 41(2). All parties have ratified or approved it.


(1)  The treaty was published in OJ L 278, 27.10.2017, p. 3.