do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-743/15: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Vinnolit v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources — Annulment of the act criticised by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, financial aid, reimbursement of aid, renewable energy








C_2019295EN.01003701.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/37






Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Vinnolit v Commission
(Case T-743/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/47)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Vinnolit GmbH & Co. KG (Ismaning, Germany) (represented by: M. Geipel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.











2.



The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Vinnolit GmbH & Co. KG.







(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1108 of 27 June 2019 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Russia, Russo-Ukrainian issue, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, territorial dispute




L_2019175EN.01003801.xml










28.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 175/38








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2019/1108
of 27 June 2019
         
amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 31 July 2014 the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1).












(2)


On 19 March 2015 the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 December 2015.












(3)


On 21 December 2018 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/2078 (2), renewing Decision 2014/512/CFSP until 31 July 2019 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements.












(4)


Having assessed the implementation of the Minsk agreements, the Council considers that Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further six months in order to enable the Council to further assess their implementation.












(5)


Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP is replaced by the following:


‘1.   This Decision shall apply until 31 January 2020.’.




Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 27 June 2019.


For the Council


The President

G. CIAMBA
            





(1)  Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 13).

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/2078 of 21 December 2018 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 331, 28.12.2018, p. 224).
Information on the date of signature of the Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Guinea-Bissau, agreement (EU), fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing rights, protocol to an agreement, sea fishing, sustainable fisheries








L_2019173EN.01003501.xml










27.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 173/35







Information on the date of signature of the Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau

The Protocol (1) on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau was signed on 15 June 2019.
The Protocol applies provisionally from 15 June 2019, date of signature, in accordance with its Article 16.


(1)  See page 3 of this Official Journal.
Case T-576/15: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — VIK v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources — Annulment of the act criticised by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, financial aid, reimbursement of aid, renewable energy








C_2019295EN.01003401.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/34






Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — VIK v Commission
(Case T-576/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/43)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: VIK Verband der Industriellen Energie- und Kraftwirtschaft eV (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Kahle, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.











2.



The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by VIK Verband der Industriellen Energie- und Kraftwirtschaft eV.







(1)  OJ C 7, 11.1.2016
Case T-738/15: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Aurubis and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources — Annulment of the act criticised by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, financial aid, reimbursement of aid, renewable energy








C_2019295EN.01003601.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/36






Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Aurubis and Others v Commission
(Case T-738/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/46)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Aurubis AG (Hamburg, Germany) and the other 7 applicants whose names are annexed to the order (represented by: C. Arhold and N. Wimmer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.











2.



The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Aurubis AG and those of the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex.







(1)  OJ C 59, 15.2.2016
Case T-391/19: Action brought on 27 June 2019 — Vinci v Parliament
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Italy, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, national law, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty








C_2019270EN.01005002.xml










12.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/50






Action brought on 27 June 2019 — Vinci v Parliament
(Case T-391/19)
(2019/C 270/52)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Vinci (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Merola, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare non existent or annul in its entirety the measure of which the applicant was informed by means of the contested communication, in which the European Parliament redetermined retirement pension rights and ordered recovery of the amount paid on the basis of the earlier pension calculation;










—


order the European Parliament to refund all the sums unduly withheld, and to pay statutory interest from the date of withholding to the date of payment and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and undertake all the necessary initiatives, acts or measures to ensure the immediate, full re-establishment of the original pension amount;










—


order the European Parliament to pay the costs of the legal proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Case T-389/19 Coppo Gavazzi v Parliament.
Case T-1/19: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — CJ v Court of Justice of the European Union (Law governing the institutions — Documents available to the public on the internet relating to closed General Court and Civil Service Tribunal cases — Request for anonymity ex post — Failure of the Court of Justice of the European Union to respond to the request — Action for failure to act — Position adopted in the course of the proceedings — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: General Court (EU), Internet, access to information, data protection, equal treatment, personal data, protection of privacy








C_2019295EN.01003801.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/38






Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — CJ v Court of Justice of the European Union
(Case T-1/19) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Documents available to the public on the internet relating to closed General Court and Civil Service Tribunal cases - Request for anonymity ex post - Failure of the Court of Justice of the European Union to respond to the request - Action for failure to act - Position adopted in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/49)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CJ (represented by V. Kolias, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by J. Inghelram, Á. Almendros Manzano and V. Hanley-Emilsson, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Court of Justice of the European Union unlawfully failed to grant the applicant anonymity, ex post, as regards publicly available documents relating to closed General Court and Civil Service Tribunal cases or, in the alternative, to ensure that versions bearing his name (‘nominal versions’) are not accessible to internet search engine providers.

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no need to adjudicate on the action.











2.



The Court of Justice of the European Union shall pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 164, 13.5.2019.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019216EN.01000301.xml










27.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 216/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

26 June 2019
(2019/C 216/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1362 




JPY


Japanese yen


122,40 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4651 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89603 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5435 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1113 




ISK


Iceland króna


141,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6733 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,486 




HUF


Hungarian forint


323,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2627 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7220 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,5500 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6277 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4947 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8724 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7004 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5387 




KRW


South Korean won


1 312,86 




ZAR


South African rand


16,2802 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8139 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3956 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 097,68 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7124 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,456 




RUB


Russian rouble


71,6399 




THB


Thai baht


34,955 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,3624 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,7972 




INR


Indian rupee


78,5705 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-605/15: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources — Annulment of the act criticised by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, financial aid, reimbursement of aid, renewable energy








C_2019295EN.01003402.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/34






Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl and Others v Commission
(Case T-605/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/44)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl (Düsseldorf, Germany) and the other 17 applicants whose names are annexed to the order (represented by: H. Janssen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.











2.



The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl and the other 17 applicants whose names are annexed to the order.







(1)  OJ C 27, 26.1.2016
Case T-334/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Bodegas Altún v EUIPO — Codorníu (ANA DE ALTUN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ANA DE ALTUN — Earlier national figurative mark ANNA — Relative ground for refusal — Reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Rioja, Spain, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, white wine








C_2019288EN.01004801.xml










26.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/48






Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Bodegas Altún v EUIPO — Codorníu (ANA DE ALTUN)
(Case T-334/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark ANA DE ALTUN - Earlier national figurative mark ANNA - Relative ground for refusal - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 288/61)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Bodegas Altún, SL (Baños de Ebro, Spain) (represented by: J. Oria Sousa-Montes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Codorníu, SA (Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain) (represented initially by: M. Ceballos Rodríguez and J. Güell Serra, lawyers, and subsequently by M. Ceballos Rodríguez and E. Stoyanov Edissonov, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2018 (Case R 173/2018-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Codorníu and Bodegas Altún.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 14 March 2018 (Case R 173/2018-1);











2.



Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by Bodegas Altún, SL;











3.



Orders Codorníu, SA to bear its own costs and to pay one half of the costs incurred by Bodegas Altún.







(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.
Case T-294/15: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — ArcelorMittal Hochfeld v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources — Annulment of the act criticised by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy consumption, financial aid, reimbursement of aid, renewable energy








C_2019295EN.01003202.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/32






Order of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — ArcelorMittal Hochfeld v Commission
(Case T-294/15) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/41)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicants: ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH, successor in title to ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH (Duisburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Janssen, et G.–R. Engel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: R. Sauer, and subsequently by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.











2.



The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH, successor in title to ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH.







(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.
Case T-385/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Aldi v EUIPO — Crone (CRONE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CRONE — Earlier EU figurative marks crane and earlier word mark CRANE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alloy, animal skin, clock and watch industry, clothing, footwear industry, hides and furskins industry, precious metal, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019305EN.01005002.xml










9.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 305/50






Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2019 — Aldi v EUIPO — Crone (CRONE)
(Case T-385/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark CRONE - Earlier EU figurative marks crane and earlier word mark CRANE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 305/60)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and M. Minkner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Crawcour and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Christoph Michael Crone (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: M. van Maele and H.-Y. Cho, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2018 (Case R 1100/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Aldi and Mr Crone.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Aldi GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9327 — YZJ Group/Mitsui E&amp;S Group/Mitsui &amp; CO Group/JV) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-06-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, logistics, merger control, provision of services, shipbuilding, wholesale trade








C_2019233EN.01000101.xml










11.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 233/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9327 — YZJ Group/Mitsui E&S Group/Mitsui & CO Group/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 233/01)
On 27 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9327. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.