Case C-723/17: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2008/50/EC — Articles 6, 7, 13 and 23 — Annex III — Assessment of air quality — Criteria for determining whether the nitrogen dioxide limit values have been exceeded — Measurements using fixed sampling points — Choice of appropriate sites — Interpretation of the values measured at the sampling points — Obligations of the Member States — Judicial review — Intensity of the review — Power to issue directions)
Date: 2019-06-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air quality, judicial review, oxide, pollution control, sampling








C_2019280EN.01000401.xml










19.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 280/4






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer
(Case C-723/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2008/50/EC - Articles 6, 7, 13 and 23 - Annex III - Assessment of air quality - Criteria for determining whether the nitrogen dioxide limit values have been exceeded - Measurements using fixed sampling points - Choice of appropriate sites - Interpretation of the values measured at the sampling points - Obligations of the Member States - Judicial review - Intensity of the review - Power to issue directions)
(2019/C 280/04)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Lies Craeynest, Cristina Lopez Devaux, Frédéric Mertens, Stefan Vandereulen, Karin De Schepper, ClientEarth VZW

Defendants: Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer

Other party: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 4(3) TEU and the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with the third paragraph of Article 288 TFEU, and Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe must be interpreted as meaning that it is for a national court, hearing an application submitted for that purpose by individuals directly affected by the exceedance of the limit values referred to in Article 13(1) of that directive, to verify whether the sampling points located in a particular zone have been established in accordance with the criteria laid down in paragraph 1(a) of Section B of Annex III to the directive and, if they were not, to take all necessary measures in respect of the competent national authority, such as, if provided for by national law, an order, with a view to ensuring that those sampling points are sited in accordance with those criteria.










2.


Article 13(1) and Article 23(1) of Directive 2008/50 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to establish whether a limit value with an averaging period of one calendar year, as laid down in Annex XI to that directive, has been exceeded, it is sufficient that a pollution level higher than that value be measured at a single sampling point.






(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.