Case C-612/16: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — C & J Clark International Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Anti-dumping — Interpretation and validity of regulations re-imposing anti-dumping duties following the delivery by the Court of a judgment declaring invalidity — Legal basis — Non-retroactivity — Limitation)
Date: 2019-06-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, footwear industry, import (EU), legal basis, limitation of legal proceedings, originating product, retroactivity of a law








C_2019270EN.01000301.xml










12.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/3






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — C & J Clark International Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
(Case C-612/16) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Anti-dumping - Interpretation and validity of regulations re-imposing anti-dumping duties following the delivery by the Court of a judgment declaring invalidity - Legal basis - Non-retroactivity - Limitation)
(2019/C 270/03)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: C & J Clark International Ltd

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Operative part of the judgment







1.


An examination of the questions of validity referred to the Court has revealed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395 of 18 August 2016 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and produced by Buckinghan Shoe Mfg Co. Ltd, Buildyet Shoes Mfg., DongGuan Elegant Top Shoes Co. Ltd, Dongguan Stella Footwear Co. Ltd, Dongguan Taiway Sports Goods Limited, Foshan City Nanhai Qun Rui Footwear Co., Jianle Footwear Industrial, Sihui Kingo Rubber Shoes Factory, Synfort Shoes Co. Ltd, Taicang Kotoni Shoes Co. Ltd, Wei Hao Shoe Co. Ltd, Wei Hua Shoe Co. Ltd, Win Profile Industries Ltd, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14, or the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647 of 13 September 2016 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and produced by Best Royal Co. Ltd, Lac Cuong Footwear Co., Ltd, Lac Ty Co., Ltd, Saoviet Joint Stock Company (Megastar Joint Stock Company), VMC Royal Co Ltd, Freetrend Industrial Ltd and its related company Freetrend Industrial A (Vietnam) Co, Ltd, Fulgent Sun Footwear Co., Ltd, General Shoes Ltd, Golden Star Co, Ltd, Golden Top Company Co., Ltd, Kingmaker Footwear Co. Ltd, Tripos Enterprise Inc., Vietnam Shoe Majesty Co., Ltd, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14;










2.


The rules on limitation laid down in Article 221(3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, are applicable to the collection of the anti-dumping duties established by the implementing regulations referred to in point 1 of the operative part of the present judgment.






(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.