do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-317/18: Order of the General Court of 17 June 2019 — Fugro v Commission (Action for annulment — Galileo satellite navigation programme — Technical and operational specifications — Lack of individual concern — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2019-06-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: restriction on competition, satellite communications, satellite navigation, service, technical specification








C_2019295EN.01003702.xml










2.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/37






Order of the General Court of 17 June 2019 — Fugro v Commission
(Case T-317/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Galileo satellite navigation programme - Technical and operational specifications - Lack of individual concern - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2019/C 295/48)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Fugro NV (Leidschendam, Netherlands) (represented by: initially, T. Snoep and V. van Weperen and, subsequently, V. van Weperen, H. Gornall and J. de Pree, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Armati and B. Sasinowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/321 of 2 March 2018 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/224 setting out the technical and operational specifications allowing the commercial service offered by the system established under the Galileo programme to fulfil the function referred to in Article 2(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2018 L 62, p. 34), and, in the alternative, for annulment of Article 1(2) of that decision.

Operative part of the order







1.



The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.











2.



Fugro NV is ordered to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9252 — CMOC/IXM) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-06-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: copper, economic concentration, lead, merger control, metallurgical industry, mining industry, molybdenum, precious metal, tungsten, zinc








C_2019203EN.01000501.xml










17.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 203/5






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9252 — CMOC/IXM)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 203/04)

1.   
On 5 June 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


CMOC Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Molybdenum Co. Ltd (‘CMOC’, China), whose main shareholder is Cathay Fortune Corporation Co. Ltd (‘CFC’),










—


IXM BV (‘IXM’, the Netherlands), controlled by New Silk Road Commodities Limited, which is wholly owned by NCCL Natural Resources Investment Fund LP.




CMOC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of IXM. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for CMOC: mining, processing, smelting, deep processing, research and development and trade of molybdenum, tungsten, copper, gold and other precious metals,
—   for IXM (formerly known as Louis Dreyfus Company Metals): global trader in both base metal concentrates (such as copper, zinc and lead concentrates) and refined metals (copper, zinc and lead) and by products (blister, anode, anode slimes, precious metal concentrates, cobalt and secondaries).


3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9252 — CMOC/IXM
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-364/19: Action brought on 17 June 2019 — Moretti v Parliament
Date: 2019-06-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, damages, equal treatment, legality, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retroactivity of a law








C_2019263EN.01006401.xml










5.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/64






Action brought on 17 June 2019 — Moretti v Parliament
(Case T-364/19)
(2019/C 263/69)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Moretti (Nembro, Italy) (represented by: M. Paniz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the communiqué of the European Parliament Directorate-General for Finance implementing Resolution No 14/2018 of 12 July 2018 of the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies and/or Resolution No 6/2018 of the Presidential Council of the Senate of the Italian Republic, and, in any event,










—


annul the redetermination and recalculation of the life annuity disbursed by the European Parliament;










—


accordingly, declare that the applicant is entitled to the maintenance of the life annuity in question in so far as it was accrued and is being accrued on the basis of the legislation in force prior to Resolution No 14/2018 of the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber [of Deputies] and/or Resolution No 6/2018 of the Presidential Council of the Senate of the Italian Republic, and order the European Parliament to pay him all the sums unduly withheld, adjusted for inflation, together with statutory interest from the date of withholding until the date of payment;










—


order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and immediately to restore in full the original amount of the life annuity, and to pay compensation for all damages if and to the extent that damages are payable to the applicant; and










—


in any event, order the Parliament to pay all costs, lawyers’ fees, plus VAT, taxes, duties and flat-rate charges.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-345/19, Santini v Parliament.