do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-353/19: Action brought on 10 June 2019 — Gamma-A v EUIPO — Piejūra (Packing for foodstuffs)
Date: 2019-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, foodstuff, packaging product








C_2019255EN.01005401.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/54






Action brought on 10 June 2019 — Gamma-A v EUIPO — Piejūra (Packing for foodstuffs)
(Case T-353/19)
(2019/C 255/67)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Gamma-A SIA (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: M. Liguts, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Piejūra SIA (Nīcas novads, Latvia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: European Union design No 1819 558-0002 (Packing for foodstuffs)

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 March 2019 in Case R 2543/2017-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and declare the design valid;










—


order EUIPO and the invalidity applicant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
Case T-348/19: Action brought on 10 June 2019 — Poggiolini v Parliament
Date: 2019-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Member of the European Parliament, allowances and expenses, pension scheme, primacy of EU law, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2019263EN.01005601.xml










5.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/56






Action brought on 10 June 2019 — Poggiolini v Parliament
(Case T-348/19)
(2019/C 263/62)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Danilo Poggiolini (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sorrentino and A. Sandulli, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the contested note and order the European Parliament to pay him the sums unduly withheld while the proceedings are pending.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action has been brought against Note D (2019) 14435 of 11 April 2019 of the European Parliament Directorate-General for Finance, concerning the redetermination of the pension which the applicant receives as a former Member of the European Parliament.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-347/19, Falqui v European Parliament.
Case T-346/19: Action brought on 10 June 2019 — Ceravolo v Parliament
Date: 2019-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Member of the European Parliament, damages, legality, pension scheme, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retroactivity of a law








C_2019263EN.01005301.xml










5.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/53






Action brought on 10 June 2019 — Ceravolo v Parliament
(Case T-346/19)
(2019/C 263/60)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Domenico Ceravolo (Noventa Padovana, Italy) (represented by: M. Paniz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the communiqué of the European Parliament Directorate-General for Finance implementing Resolution No 14/2018 of 12 July 2018 of the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies and/or Resolution No 6/2018 of the Presidential Council of the Senate of the Italian Republic, having established that it is unlawful on the grounds of failure to observe the principles of legitimate expectations, the protection of acquired rights, reasonableness, proportionality and legality, and infringement of Articles 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol thereto, as well as Articles 27 and 28 of the Statute for Members of the European Parliament and Articles 75 and 76 of the Implementing Measures for that statute, and, in any event, annul the redetermination and recalculation of the life annuity disbursed by the European Parliament;










—


accordingly, declare that the applicant is entitled to the maintenance of the life annuity disbursed by the European Parliament in so far as it was accrued and is being accrued on the basis of the legislation in force prior to Resolution No 14/2018 of the Office of the President of the Italian Chamber [of Deputies] and/or Resolution No 6/2018 of the Presidential Council of the Senate of the Italian Republic, and order the European Parliament to pay him all the sums unduly withheld, adjusted for inflation, together with statutory interest from the date of withholding until the date of payment, and order the European Parliament to implement the judgment and immediately to restore in full the original amount of the life annuity, and to pay compensation for all damages if and to the extent that damages are payable; and










—


in any event, order the Parliament to pay all costs, lawyers’ fees, plus VAT, taxes, duties and flat-rate charges.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-345/19, Santini v Parliament.
Case T-352/19: Action brought on 10 June 2019 — Gamma-A v EUIPO — Piejūra (Packing for foodstuffs)
Date: 2019-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, foodstuff, packaging product








C_2019255EN.01005301.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/53






Action brought on 10 June 2019 — Gamma-A v EUIPO — Piejūra (Packing for foodstuffs)
(Case T-352/19)
(2019/C 255/66)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Gamma-A SIA (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: M. Liguts, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Piejūra SIA (Nīcas novads, Latvia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Design at issue: European Union design No 2022 772-0001 (Packing for foodstuffs)

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2019 in Case R 2516/2017-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and declare the design valid;










—


order EUIPO and the invalidity applicant to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.