do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-333/19: Action brought on 30 May 2019 — Ntolas v EUIPO — General Nutrition Investment (GN GENETIC NUTRITION LABORATORIES)
Date: 2019-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vitamin








C_2019246EN.01004401.xml










22.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 246/44






Action brought on 30 May 2019 — Ntolas v EUIPO — General Nutrition Investment (GN GENETIC NUTRITION LABORATORIES)
(Case T-333/19)
(2019/C 246/46)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Christos Ntolas (Wuppertal, Germany) (represented by: C. Renger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: General Nutrition Investment Co. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark GN GENETIC NUTRITION LABORATORIES — Application for registration No 13 116 678

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 March 2019 in Case R 1343/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the opposition;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-327/19: Action brought on 30 May 2019 — Mubarak v Council
Date: 2019-05-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Egypt, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, natural person, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2019255EN.01004601.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/46






Action brought on 30 May 2019 — Mubarak v Council
(Case T-327/19)
(2019/C 255/59)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak (Cairo, Egypt) (represented by: B. Kennelly QC, J. Pobjoy, Barrister, G. Martin, C. Enderby Smith and F. Holmey, Solicitors)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/468 of 21 March 2019 (1) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/459 of 21 March 2019 (2), insofar as they apply to the applicant; and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the defendant had failed to verify that the Egyptian authorities would have respected the applicant’s fundamental European Union rights, including Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in the context of the proceedings and investigations relied upon by the defendant.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant made errors of assessment in considering that the criterion for listing the applicant in Article 1 of Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (3) and Article 2 of Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 of 21 March 2011 (4) would have been satisfied.






(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/468 of 21 March 2019 amending Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ L 80, 22.3.2019, p. 40).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/459 of 21 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ L 80, 22.3.2019, p. 1).

(3)  Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63).

(4)  Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4).