do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-402/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 24 May 2019 — LM v Centre public d’action sociale de Seraing
Date: 2019-05-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: blood disease, child, equal treatment, family migration, foreign national, illegal migration, protection of privacy, removal, return migration, right to justice








C_2019255EN.01002601.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/26






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 24 May 2019 — LM v Centre public d’action sociale de Seraing
(Case C-402/19)
(2019/C 255/35)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour du travail de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: LM

Respondent: Centre public d’action sociale de Seraing

Questions referred

Does point 1 of the first subparagraph of Article 57(2) of the Organic Law of 8 July 1976 on public social welfare centres infringe Articles 5 and 13 of Directive 2008/115/EC, (1) read in the light of Articles 19(2) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and Article 14(1)(b) of that directive and Articles 7 and [21] of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Abdida judgment of 18 December 2014 (Case C-562/13):






—


first, in so far as it results in depriving a third-country national, staying illegally on the territory of a Member State, of provision, in so far as possible, for his basic needs pending resolution of the action for suspension and annulment that he has brought in his own name as the representative of his child, who was at that time a minor, against a decision ordering them to leave the territory of a Member State;










—


where, second, on the one hand, that child who has now come of age suffers from a serious illness and the enforcement of that decision may expose that child to a serious risk of grave and irreversible deterioration in her state of health and, on the other, the presence of that parent alongside his daughter who has now come of age is considered to be imperative by the medical professional given that she is particularly vulnerable as a result of her state of health (recurrent sickle cell crises and the need for surgery in order to prevent paralysis)?






(1)  Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).
Case C-403/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 24 May 2019 — Société Générale SA v Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics
Date: 2019-05-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: corporation tax, discrimination on the basis of nationality, double taxation, free movement of capital, nationality of legal persons








C_2019270EN.01002201.xml










12.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/22






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 24 May 2019 — Société Générale SA v Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics
(Case C-403/19)
(2019/C 270/25)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Société Générale SA

Defendant: Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics

Question referred

In the light of Article 56 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, now Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, does the fact that the application of the rules set out in paragraph 5 of this decision, in order to compensate for the double taxation of dividends paid to a company liable for corporation tax in the Member State of residence by a company resident in another Member State and subject, by virtue of the exercise by that Member States of the power of taxation, to withholding tax, is liable to create a disadvantage to the detriment of transactions involving the securities of foreign companies carried out by companies liable for corporation tax in the first Member State, mean that that State, where it has been decided to grant a concession in response to the double taxation, goes beyond waiving its right to receive the tax revenue that it would derive from the imposition of corporation tax on the dividends in question?
Case C-409/19 P: Appeal brought on 24 May 2019 by Hochmann Marketing GmbH against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 22 March 2019 in Case T-673/18, Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Commission
Date: 2019-05-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, amendment of a law, appeal to the Court (EU), competence of the institution, injunction, rules of procedure








C_2020010EN.01002201.xml










13.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/22






Appeal brought on 24 May 2019 by Hochmann Marketing GmbH against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 22 March 2019 in Case T-673/18, Hochmann Marketing GmbH v European Commission
(Case C-409/19 P)
(2020/C 10/28)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Hochmann Marketing GmbH (represented by: J. Jennings, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 31 October 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Case C-408/19 P: Appeal brought on 24 May 2019 by Hochmann Marketing GmbH against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 22 March 2019 in Case T-657/18, Hochmann Marketing GmbH v Council of the European Union
Date: 2019-05-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: admissibility, amendment of a law, appeal to the Court (EU), competence of the institution, injunction, rules of procedure








C_2020010EN.01002102.xml










13.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/21






Appeal brought on 24 May 2019 by Hochmann Marketing GmbH against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 22 March 2019 in Case T-657/18, Hochmann Marketing GmbH v Council of the European Union
(Case C-408/19 P)
(2020/C 10/27)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Hochmann Marketing GmbH (represented by: J. Jennings, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
By order of 31 October 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.
Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2019-05-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, telecommunications equipment








C_2019179EN.01000401.xml










24.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/4






Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(2019/C 179/05)
Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 370, the explanatory note to CN subheading ‘8544 70 00 Optical-fibre cables’ is replaced by the following:








‘8544 70 00




Optical fibre cables

This subheading also includes optical-fibre cables, designed for example for telecommunication use, made up of one or more optical fibres of heading 9001 which are individually coated with a dual layer of acrylate polymer. The coating consists of an inner layer of soft acrylate and an outer layer of hard acrylate, the latter may be coloured or coated by a layer of different colours to permit the identification of the fibres. The optical fibres are individually sheathed by the dual layer coating; they do not form an optical fibre cable of heading 8544 by themselves until placed in a protective casing.
The dual layer coating of the individual optical fibres provides protection and structural integrity, for example by protecting the individual fibres against fracture and abrasion.
Example of the structure of an individually sheathed optical fibre of heading 9001:







1.


Optical fibre core (Glass fibre core);










2.


Optical fibre cladding (Glass);










3.


Inner layer of soft acrylate coating;










4.


Outer layer of hard acrylate coating;










5.


Colour coding identification.




Examples of optical fibre cables of heading 8544 made up of individually sheathed fibres placed in a protective casing:


 ’.







(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.