do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-138/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet v Estron A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Hearing aid connectors — Parts and accessories — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 85444290, 90214000 and 90219010)
Date: 2019-05-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, electrical equipment, specification of tariff heading








C_2019255EN.01001101.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/11






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet v Estron A/S
(Case C-138/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Hearing aid connectors - Parts and accessories - Combined Nomenclature - Subheadings 85444290, 90214000 and 90219010)
(2019/C 255/13)
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Skatteministeriet

Defendant: Estron A/S

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Note 2(a) to Chapter 90 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1031/2008 of 19 September 2008, read in conjunction with General Rules Nos 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, must be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘Parts and accessories which are goods included in any of the headings of this chapter or of Chapter 84, 85 or 91’ in that note refers only to the four-digit headings of those chapters.










2.


It is for the referring court to classify the hearing aid connectors at issue in the main proceedings for customs purposes in the light of the indications provided by the Court in answer to the questions that the referring court referred to it for a preliminary ruling.










3.


Note 1(m) to Section XVI of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Regulation No 2658/87, as amended by Regulation No 1031/2008, must be interpreted as meaning that, where goods are included in Chapter 90, they cannot also be included in Chapters 84 and 85 thereof.






(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Case T-396/18: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — ITSA v Commission (Action for annulment — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related product — Establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products — Delegated Regulation and implementing acts — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2019-05-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer information, labelling, marketing standard, packaging, technical standard, tobacco, tobacco industry, traceability








C_2019230EN.01005001.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/50






Order of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — ITSA v Commission
(Case T-396/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Approximation of laws - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related product - Establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products - Delegated Regulation and implementing acts - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(2019/C 230/62)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) (Sunbury-on-Thames, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Scanvic, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and C. Valero, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/573 of 15 December 2017 on key elements of data storage contracts to be concluded as part of a traceability system for tobacco products (OJ 2018 L 96, p.1), Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/574 of 15 December 2017 on technical standards for the establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products (OJ 2018 L 96, p.7), and Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/576 of 15 December 2017 on technical standards for security features applied to tobacco products (OJ 2018 L 96, p 57).

Operative part of the order







1.



The action is dismissed as inadmissible.











2.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of the Council of the European Union.











3.



International Tax Stamp Association Ltd (ITSA) shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.











4.



The Council shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.







(1)  OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Case C-385/19: Reference for a preliminary ruling from International Protection Appeals Tribunal (Ireland) made on 16 May 2019 — Ms R.A.T., Mr D.S. v Minister for Justice and Equality
Date: 2019-05-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, job access, migrant worker, right of asylum








C_2019255EN.01002501.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/25






Reference for a preliminary ruling from International Protection Appeals Tribunal (Ireland) made on 16 May 2019 — Ms R.A.T., Mr D.S. v Minister for Justice and Equality
(Case C-385/19)
(2019/C 255/33)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

International Protection Appeals Tribunal

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Ms R.A.T. and Mr D.S.

Respondent: Minister for Justice and Equality

Questions referred







1)


Are there separate categories of ‘Applicant’ envisaged in Article 15 of Directive 2013/33/EU (1)?










2)


What type of conduct will amount to delay attributable to the applicant within the meaning of Article 15(1) of Directive 2013/33/EU?






(1)  Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (OJ 2013, L 180, p. 96).
Case T-733/17: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — GMPO v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 — Definition of ‘significant benefit’ — Availability of orphan medicinal products — Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 — Commission decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products — Error of assessment — Error of law — Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2019-05-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: drug surveillance, market approval, orphan drug








C_2019230EN.01003101.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/31






Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — GMPO v Commission
(Case T-733/17) (1)

(Medicinal products for human use - Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Definition of ‘significant benefit’ - Availability of orphan medicinal products - Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 - Commission decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products - Error of assessment - Error of law - Legitimate expectations)
(2019/C 230/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: GMP-Orphan (GMPO) (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Demetriou QC, E. Mackenzie, Barrister, L. Tsang and J. Mulryne, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Petersen and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2017) 6102 final of 5 September 2017 granting marketing authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council for ‘Cuprior-trientine’, a medicinal product for human use, in so far as the Commission decided, in Article 5 of that decision, that that medicinal product no longer satisfied the criteria laid down in Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (OJ 2000 L 18, p. 1) to be registered as an orphan medicinal product and that the European Union Register of Orphan Medicinal Products should be updated accordingly.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders GMP-Orphan (GMPO) to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.







(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/939 of 26 June 2018 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Cidre Contentin’/‘Contentin’ (PDO)) (OJ L 166, 3.7.2018)
Date: 2019-05-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: France, Lower Normandy, cider, designation of origin, labelling, product designation








L_2019127EN.01008001.xml










16.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 127/80







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/939 of 26 June 2018 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Cidre Contentin’/‘Contentin’ (PDO))

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 166 of 3 July 2018
)


On the cover, in the table of contents, and on page 3, in the title, recitals 2 and 3, the first paragraph of Article 1, and in Article 2:
for:

               ‘Contentin’,
read:

               ‘Cotentin’.
Case C-204/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 — Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) v European Commission (Appeal — Environment — Prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species — Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 — Adoption of a list of invasive alien species of Union concern — Inclusion of the species Procambarus clarkii)
Date: 2019-05-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: crustacean, environmental protection, environmental risk prevention, invasive species








C_2019255EN.01001201.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/12






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 May 2019 — Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) v European Commission
(Case C-204/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Environment - Prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species - Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 - Adoption of a list of invasive alien species of Union concern - Inclusion of the species Procambarus clarkii)
(2019/C 255/15)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) (represented by: A. Uceda Sosa, abogado)

Other party: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková and C. Hermes, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.