do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-383/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Ostrowie Wielkopolskim (Poland) lodged on 15 May 2019 — Powiat Ostrowski v Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny z siedzibą w Warszawie
Date: 2019-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative unit, civil liability, compulsory insurance, local authority, motor vehicle insurance, third-party insurance








C_2019280EN.01002302.xml










19.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 280/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Ostrowie Wielkopolskim (Poland) lodged on 15 May 2019 — Powiat Ostrowski v Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny z siedzibą w Warszawie
(Case C-383/19)
(2019/C 280/31)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Ostrowie Wielkopolskim

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Powiat Ostrowski

Defendant: Ubezpieczeniowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny z siedzibą w Warszawie

Questions referred







1)


Must Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, (1) be interpreted as meaning that the obligation to take out civil liability motor insurance extends even to situations in which a local government authority — a district — has acquired, on the basis of a court decision, title to a vehicle which is not capable of being driven, is on private property in the form of a guarded car park not on the public highway, and is to be destroyed in accordance with the wishes of its owner?










2)


Or must it be interpreted as meaning that, in such circumstances, the local government authority, as the owner of the vehicle, is not obliged to take out insurance, without prejudice to the liability of the fund towards injured third parties?






(1)  OJ 2009 L 263, p. 11.
Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 (OJ C 19, 15.1.2019)
Date: 2019-05-15
Institutions: European Securities and Markets Authority
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts








C_2019166EN.01001301.xml










15.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 166/13






Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 19 of 15 January 2019
)
(2019/C 166/07)
On page 3, in column ‘Appropriations 2018’:






—


row ‘Chapter 4 0’:





for:


‘490 452’,


read:


‘558 074’,







—


row ‘Title 4 — Total’:





for:


‘2 280 452’,


read:


‘2 348 074’,







—


row ‘GRAND TOTAL’:





for:


‘44 413 567’,


read:


‘44 481 189’.

On page 3, in column ‘New amount’:






—


row ‘Chapter 4 0’:





for:


‘490 452’,


read:


‘558 074’,







—


row ‘Title 4 — Total’:





for:


‘2 280 452’,


read:


‘2 348 074’,







—


row ‘GRAND TOTAL’:





for:


‘44 191 067’,


read:


‘44 258 689’.
Case C-306/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — pobočka v Olomouci — Czech Republic) — KORADO a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Welded steel parts — Radiators for central heating, not electrically heated — Headings 7307 and 7322 — Concepts of radiator ‘parts’ and ‘tube or pipe fittings’ — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/23 — Validity)
Date: 2019-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, heating, piping, specification of tariff heading








C_2019255EN.01001402.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/14






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — pobočka v Olomouci — Czech Republic) — KORADO a.s. v Generální ředitelství cel
(Case C-306/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Welded steel parts - Radiators for central heating, not electrically heated - Headings 7307 and 7322 - Concepts of radiator ‘parts’ and ‘tube or pipe fittings’ - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/23 - Validity)
(2019/C 255/18)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Krajský soud v Ostravě — pobočka v Olomouci

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: KORADO a.s.

Defendant: Generální ředitelství cel

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1101/2014 of 16 October 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that welded steel parts such as those at issue in the main proceedings must, subject to the referring court’s assessment of all the factual information available to it, be classified under CN heading 7307, as ‘tube or pipe fittings’.


(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Case C-653/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 May 2019 — VM Vermögens-Management GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), DAT Vermögensmanagement GmbH (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark Vermögensmanufaktur — Declaration of invalidity — Right to a fair hearing — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Retrospectivity — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Statement of reasons for judgments)
Date: 2019-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, financial services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019255EN.01000501.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/5






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 May 2019 — VM Vermögens-Management GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), DAT Vermögensmanagement GmbH
(Case C-653/17 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 - Invalidity proceedings - Word mark Vermögensmanufaktur - Declaration of invalidity - Right to a fair hearing - Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion - Retrospectivity - Jurisdiction of the General Court - Statement of reasons for judgments)
(2019/C 255/06)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: VM Vermögens-Management GmbH (represented by: T. Dolde and P. Homann, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent), DAT Vermögensmanagement GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders VM Vermögens-Management GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.
Case C-677/17: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — M. Çoban v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Additional Protocol — Article 59 — Decision No 3/80 — Social security for migrant workers — Waiver of residence clauses — Article 6 — Invalidity benefit — Withdrawal — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Special non-contributory cash benefits — Residence condition — Directive 2003/109/EC — Long-term resident status)
Date: 2019-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Türkiye, additional benefit, association agreement, disability insurance, migrant worker, protocol to an agreement, residence








C_2019255EN.01000601.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/6






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — M. Çoban v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen
(Case C-677/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Additional Protocol - Article 59 - Decision No 3/80 - Social security for migrant workers - Waiver of residence clauses - Article 6 - Invalidity benefit - Withdrawal - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Special non-contributory cash benefits - Residence condition - Directive 2003/109/EC - Long-term resident status)
(2019/C 255/07)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: M. Çoban

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen

Operative part of the judgment

The first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Decision No 3/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the application of the social security schemes of the Member States of the European Communities to Turkish workers and members of their families, in conjunction with Article 59 of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 in Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 of 19 December 1972, must be interpreted as not precluding a national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which withdraws a supplementary benefit from a Turkish national who returns to his country of origin and who holds, at the date of his departure from the host Member State, long-term resident status, within the meaning of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents.


(1)  OJ C 94, 12.3.2018.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2019-05-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: Belarus, China, Russia, Ukraine, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), iron, originating product, piping, steel, tube








C_2019166EN.01000701.xml










15.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 166/7






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2019/C 166/04)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Welded tubes and pipes of iron or non-alloy steel


Belarus, Russia and the People’s Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/110 of 26 January 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain welded tubes and pipes of iron or non-alloy steel originating in Belarus, the People’s Republic of China and Russia and terminating the proceeding for imports of certain welded tubes and pipes of iron or non-alloy steel originating in Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
(OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 6)


28.1.2020






(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column
Case C-170/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2019 — CJ v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control — Fixed-term contract — Termination of the contract — Compliance with a judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal — Res judicata by means of a judgment annulling a decision — Limits)
Date: 2019-05-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: contract staff, servant (EU), temporary employment, termination of employment








C_2019255EN.01001102.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/11






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2019 — CJ v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
(Case C-170/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Contract staff - European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - Fixed-term contract - Termination of the contract - Compliance with a judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal - Res judicata by means of a judgment annulling a decision - Limits)
(2019/C 255/14)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: CJ (represented by: V. Kolias, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by: J. Mannheim and A. Daume, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal.










2.


Orders CJ to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.
Corrigendum to the vacancy notice Ref. No: eu-LISA/19/TA/AD13/4.1 (OJ C 136 A, 12.4.2019)
Date: 2019-05-15
Institutions: European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, managing director, recruitment, servant (EU)








CI2019166EN.01000101.xml










15.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 166/1






Corrigendum to the vacancy notice Ref. No: eu-LISA/19/TA/AD13/4.1
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 136 A of 12 April 2019
)
(2019/C 166 I/01)
On page 1, in the table, ‘Level of Security Clearance’:

for:


‘TRES SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET’,


read:


‘SECRET UE/EU SECRET’;

on page 1, in the table, ‘Closing date for applications’:

for:


‘21 May 2019 (2) 23:59 EET and 22:59 CET’,


read:


‘17 June 2019 (2) 23:59 EET and 22:59 CET’;

on page 9, point 10, ‘APPLICATION PROCEDURE’, third paragraph:

for:


‘The closing date for submission of applications is: 21 May 2019 at 23:59 EET (Eastern European Time) and 22:59 CET (Central European Time).’,


read:


‘The closing date for submission of applications is: 17 June 2019 at 23:59 EET (Eastern European Time) and 22:59 CET (Central European Time).’