do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision of 14 May 2019 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Hungary
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Hungary, advisory committee (EU), appointment of members, occupational safety




C_2019167EN.01000201.xml










16.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 167/2






COUNCIL DECISION
of 14 May 2019
appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Hungary
(2019/C 167/02)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to the Council Decision of 22 July 2003 setting up an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,
Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,
Whereas:






(1)


By its Decisions of 12 March 2019 (2) and 15 April 2019 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 1 March 2019 to 28 February 2022.










(2)


The employees and employers organisations of Hungary have submitted further nominations for several posts to be filled,




HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 28 February 2022:
II.   TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Hungary


Mr Károly GYÖRGY


Mr László MISKÉRI







III.   EMPLOYERS' REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Hungary


Mr István KOMORÓCZKI


Ms Melinda PARRAGHNÉ GÁL
Ms Judit H. NAGY






Article 2
The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.


Article 3
This Decision shall be published for information in the Official Journal of the European Union.


Done at Brussels, 14 May 2019.


For the Council


The President

P. DAEA




(1)  OJ C 218, 13.9.2003, p. 1.

(2)  OJ C 100, 15.3.2019, p. 1.

(3)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2019, p. 20.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), organic acid, originating product








C_2019165EN.01000301.xml










14.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/3






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2019/C 165/03)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Citric acid


The People’s Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 of 21 January 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and of partial interim reviews pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
(OJ L 15, 22.1.2015, p. 8).


23.1.2020






(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Case T-751/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Commune de Fessenheim and Others v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Letter sent by the Commission to the French authorities regarding the protocol for the compensation of the EDF Group in respect of the repeal of the permit to operate the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Overriding public interest)
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Alsace, France, access to EU information, disclosure of information, indemnification, nuclear power station, nuclear safety, right to information, right to justice








C_2019230EN.01003201.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/32






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Commune de Fessenheim and Others v Commission
(Case T-751/17) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Letter sent by the Commission to the French authorities regarding the protocol for the compensation of the EDF Group in respect of the repeal of the permit to operate the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits - General presumption of confidentiality - Overriding public interest)
(2019/C 230/39)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Commune de Fessenheim (France), Communauté de communes Pays Rhin-Brisach (Volgelsheim, France), Conseil départemental du Haut-Rhin (Colmar, France), Conseil régional Grand Est Alsace Champagne-Ardenne Lorraine (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: G. de Rubercy, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: E. de Moustier, B. Fodda and J.-L. Carré, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission Decision of 18 October 2017 refusing access to the letter which it sent to the French authorities on 22 March 2017 regarding the draft protocol for the compensation of the Électricité de France (EDF) Group in respect of the closure of the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders the Commune de Fessenheim, the communauté de communes Pays Rhin-Brisach, the conseil départemental du Haut-Rhin and the conseil régional Grand Est Alsace Champagne-Ardenne Lorraine to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission;











3.



Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.







(1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.
Case T-422/18: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — RATP v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure initiated by the Commission against a Member State — Documents originating from the applicant — Third party access request — Initial decision to grant partial access — Lack of purpose — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, confidentiality, data protection, disclosure of information, personal data








C_2019230EN.01005002.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/50






Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — RATP v Commission
(Case T-422/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a procedure initiated by the Commission against a Member State - Documents originating from the applicant - Third party access request - Initial decision to grant partial access - Lack of purpose - Inadmissibility)
(2019/C 230/63)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) (Paris, France) (represented initially by: E. Morgan de Rivery, P. Delelis and C. Lavin, and subsequently by P. Delelis and C. Lavin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, W. Mölls and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport of 5 March 2018 on a request for access to documents originating from the RATP in so far as it grants partial access to those documents.

Operative part of the order







1.



The action is dismissed as inadmissible.











2.



Régie autonome des transports parisiens (RATP) is ordered to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 364, 8.10.2018.
Case T-728/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Marinvest and Porting v Commission (State aid — Pleasure port infrastructure — Concession for the management of a port and the provision of infrastructures and services without economic consideration — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Effect on trade between Member States)
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Slovenia, State aid, control of State aid, harbour installation, provision of services, trade licence








C_2019230EN.01003002.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/30






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Marinvest and Porting v Commission
(Case T-728/17) (1)

(State aid - Pleasure port infrastructure - Concession for the management of a port and the provision of infrastructures and services without economic consideration - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Effect on trade between Member States)
(2019/C 230/37)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicants: Marinvest d.o.o. (Izola, Slovenia) and Porting d.o.o. (Izola) (represented by: G. Cecovini Amigoni and L. Daniele, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Stancanelli, S. Noë and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze and R. Kanitz, and subsequently R. Kanitz, acting as Agents), Javno podjetje komunala Izola d.o.o. (Izola, Slovenia) (represented by: A. Mužina, lawyer)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission decision C(2017) 5049 final of 20 July 2017 on State aid SA.45220 (2016/FC) — Slovenia — Alleged aid in favour of Komunala Izola d.o.o.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Marinvest d.o.o. and Porting d.o.o. to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;











3.



Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and Javno podjetje komunala Izola d.o.o. to bear their own costs.







(1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.
Case T-115/19: Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Bacardi v EUIPO — La Fée (ANGEL’S ENVY)
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019230EN.01006602.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/66






Order of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Bacardi v EUIPO — La Fée (ANGEL’S ENVY)
(Case T-115/19) (1)

(2019/C 230/80)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 139, 15.4.2019.
Joined Cases T-89/18 and T-90/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Guiral Broto v EUIPO — Gastro & Soul (Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU word and figurative marks Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL — Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol — Proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark — Translation — Rights of the defence — Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, hotel industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019230EN.01003602.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/36






Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Guiral Broto v EUIPO — Gastro & Soul (Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL)
(Joined Cases T-89/18 and T-90/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Applications for the EU word and figurative marks Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL - Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol - Proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark - Translation - Rights of the defence - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2019/C 230/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ramón Guiral Broto (Marbella, Spain) (represented by: J.L. de Castro Hermida, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Gastro & Soul GmbH (Hildesheim, Germany)

Re:

Actions brought against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2017 (Cases R 1095/2017-4 and R 1096/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Guiral Broto and Gastro & Soul.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Annuls the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 December 2017 (Cases R 1095/2017-4 and R 1096/2017-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Ramón Guiral Broto and Gastro & Soul GmbH;











2.



Dismisses the actions as to the remainder;











3.



Orders EUIPO and Mr Guiral Broto each to bear their own costs.







(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.
Joined Cases C-391/16, C-77/17 and C-78/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud and from the Conseil du contentieux des étrangers — Czech Republic, Belgium) — M v Ministerstvo vnitra (C-391/16), X (C-77/17), X (C-78/17) v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Asylum policy — International protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Refugee status — Article 14(4) to (6) — Refusal to grant or revocation of refugee status in the event of danger to the security or the community of the host Member State — Validity — Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 78(1) TFEU — Article 6(3) TEU — Geneva Convention)
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid to refugees, area of freedom, security and justice, asylum seeker, foreign national, public safety, refugee, right of asylum, stateless person








C_2019255EN.01000201.xml










29.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 255/2






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud and from the Conseil du contentieux des étrangers — Czech Republic, Belgium) — M v Ministerstvo vnitra (C-391/16), X (C-77/17), X (C-78/17) v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides
(Joined Cases C-391/16, C-77/17 and C-78/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Asylum policy - International protection - Directive 2011/95/EU - Refugee status - Article 14(4) to (6) - Refusal to grant or revocation of refugee status in the event of danger to the security or the community of the host Member State - Validity - Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 78(1) TFEU - Article 6(3) TEU - Geneva Convention)
(2019/C 255/02)
Languages of the case: Czech and French

Referring courts

Nejvyšší správní soud and Conseil du contentieux des étrangers

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: M (C-391/16), X (C-77/17), X (C-78/17)

Defendants: Ministerstvo vnitra (C-391/16), Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (C-77/17, C-78/17)

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of Article 14(4) to (6) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of those provisions in the light of Article 78(1) TFEU and Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.


(1)  OJ C 350, 26.9.2016.

OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.
Council Decision of 14 May 2019 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Hungary
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Hungary, advisory committee (EU), appointment of members, free movement of workers




C_2019169EN.01000201.xml










17.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 169/2






COUNCIL DECISION
of 14 May 2019
appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Hungary
(2019/C 169/02)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (1), and in particular Articles 23 and 24 thereof,
Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,
Whereas:






(1)


By its Decisions of 28 September 2018 (2), 15 October 2018 (3), 19 November 2018 (4) and 18 February 2019 (5), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 25 September 2018 to 24 September 2020.










(2)


The Government of Hungary has submitted nominations for several posts to be filled,




HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period ending on 24 September 2020:
II.   TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Hungary


Ms Judit CZUGLERNÉ IVÁNY
Mr László KOZÁK


Ms Annamária KUNERT






Article 2
The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.


Done at Brussels, 14 May 2019.


For the Council


The President

P. DAEA




(1)  OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1.

(2)  Council Decision of 28 September 2018 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers (OJ C 366, 10.10.2018, p. 3).

(3)  Council Decision of 15 October 2018 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Portugal (OJ C 376, 18.10.2018, p. 9).

(4)  Council Decision of 19 November 2018 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Italy (OJ C 421, 21.11.2018, p. 7).

(5)  Council Decision of 18 February 2019 appointing members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Greece (OJ C 67, 20.2.2019, p. 2).
Judgment of the Court of 14 May 2019 in Case E-3/18 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland (Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Regulation (EU) 2015/1051)
Date: 2019-05-14
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, Internet, alternative dispute resolution, consumer protection, electronic commerce, form, information system, infringement procedure (EU), trade dispute








C_2019315EN.01000401.xml










19.9.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 315/4






JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 14 May 2019
in Case E-3/18
EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland

(Failure by an EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to implement — Regulation (EU) 2015/1051)

(2019/C 315/05)
In Case E-3/18, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Iceland — APPLICATION for a declaration that Iceland has failed to adopt the measures necessary to make the Act referred to at point 7ja of Annex XIX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1051 of 1 July 2015 on the modalities for the exercise of the functions of the online dispute resolution platform, on the modalities of the electronic complaint form and on the modalities of the cooperation between contact points provided for in Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes) as adapted by Protocol 1 to the Agreement, part of its internal legal order as required by Article 7 of the Agreement, the Court, composed of Páll Hreinsson, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Bernd Hammermann, Judges, gave judgment on 14 May 2019, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


Declares that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area by failing, within the time prescribed, to make part of its internal legal order the Act referred to at point 7ja of Annex XIX to the Agreement (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1051 of 1 July 2015 on the modalities for the exercise of the functions of the online dispute resolution platform, on the modalities of the electronic complaint form and on the modalities of the cooperation between contact points provided for in Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes), as adapted by Protocol 1 to the Agreement.










2.


Orders Iceland to bear the costs of the proceedings.